Commons:Deletion requests/File:Louvre at night centered.jpg
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I challenge the De minimis statement concerning the glass pyramide. It is hardly conceivable that such an integral artwort could be de minimis as it is always style-defining for the building. Hence, it never could be "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject" and never could only unintentionally included as long as the whole of the pyramide is shown. Grand-Duc (talk) 23:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- And yes, that would put File:Louvre 2007 02 24 c.jpg in jeopardy, but that could only be helped by european or french legislature I guess. Sad. Grand-Duc (talk) 23:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep: This was already discussed, and the community decided that the pyramid is de minimis long time ago. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:47, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment: Well, Denniss said in the DR from 2012 that it was "a borderline decision". But there's some new legislation in France, with a noncommercial FOP exemption. I think per COM:PRP that it could open the way for a court to tend towards the side of "illicit work reproduction", as there's a clear allowance for commercial usage on Commons. As far as I understood the French court rulings linked in COM:FOP#France, the inclusion of a protected work must be spurious to be legit. That simply won't be possible on any picture depicting this part of the Louvre... Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 19:59, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: de minimis, it's a school case. Ruthven (msg) 11:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
