Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/06/26

< Commons:Deletion requests‎ | 2024/06
25 June 2024
27 June 2024
Deletion requests on 26 June 2024

June 26

edit

File:Sheikh Abdurehman Saquafi.jpg

edit

Hah! This must be Admin Sheikh. So he is an Islamic scholar from India? That explains the good level of English. And he looks like a sympathetic guy. The smiling face of religion. Humm, but this is a copyvio, couldn't be the picture of an admin. By the way I think his name was Admin Qazi, not Sheikh. Delete per CV. 186.175.206.141 00:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •   Comment Anon nominator seems to be making snark and insults. Reverse image searches and name searches did not find other versions; no evidence that this is a copyright violation - if you know it to be so, please provide proof. Seems to be only file by uploader; unused, I'm not sure of scope usefulness; search for "Sheikh Abdurehman Saquafi" suggests a person of some notability, other photos show it to be the same person but I saw no other versions of this photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Türk Bayrağı Altında Bir Çocuk ve Kırmızı Beyaz Çiçek.jpg

edit

Yanlış fotoğraf yüklendi. VAROLPHOTOGRAPHY (talk) 00:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:منتزة السكون التربة تعز.jpg

edit

Risk of copyright violation, may not be the uploader's own work. The watermarked name at the bottom of the image does not appear to be the uploader's username. Small image without camera metadata, but has Facebook metadata. High quality image but it is the uploader's only contribution. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foto de Pablo Vidal Rojas.jpg

edit

Se sospecha de violación a derechos de autor (copyvio). La imagen había sido publicada anteriormente en el Facebook personal de la persona retratada [1]. No queda claro si la persona que subió el archivo es también el autor de la fotografía. Es posible que simplemente haya sacado la imagen de otro sitio y la haya subido utilizando una licencia inadecuada, en cuyo caso sería una violación al derecho de autor. SamuelInzunza (talk) 03:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Statue de Kosa Pan

edit

Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and although it's not clear when or if the artist of this statue died, it was inaugurated in 2020. So more then 70 years clearly hasn't passed since their death.

Adamant1 (talk) 03:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cette statue a été réalisée sur la base des images d'archives et ne remplie pas, a mon avis, les conditions nécessaires pour être classée comme une œuvre originale. C'est une sorte de copie (voir : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KosapanPortrait.jpg?uselang=fr et https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosa_Pan#/media/Fichier:Kosa_Pan,_Charles_Le_Brun,_1686.jpg) - en dehors d'une demande directe de l'auteur Wachara Prayookum je ne suis pas favorable à la suppression de ces photos S. DÉNIEL (talk) 18:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Port des records

edit

Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and although it's not clear when or if the artist of these reliefs died, it clearly hasn't been 70 years since they were created around 2010. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 03:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Naory159 (talk · contribs)

edit

The files are images of various Jewish religious books, in which they appears to be stock illustrative pictures from online retailers (despite being labelled as self work). This is also more apparent when two of the files have their sources stated as "www.mishnetorah.com". The files are therefore less likely to be the uploader's own work, and VRT would be needed.

廣九直通車 (talk) 03:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Auguste Labouret

edit

Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of these stained glass windows and mosaic, Auguste Labouret, died in 1964. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2035.

Adamant1 (talk) 03:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:2020-06-07-Oakland-BlackLivesMatter-Murals 232 (49983214193).jpg

edit

Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Marcello Tommasi (scultore)

edit

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the artist these sculptures, Marcello Tommasi, died in 2008. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2079.

Adamant1 (talk) 04:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--Sailko (talk) 09:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really feel like getting in an argument about it, but there's a difference between something between being "de minimis" and it not being the main subject or element of a photograph. They aren't the same thing. Regardless, in cases like this I usually ask if the photograph would exist or be the same without whatever the element in question is. For instance, if we were to blur out or otherwise remove the kids in the first image would be the same and/or still have been uploaded to Commons? My guess is not. It clearly exists as a display of Marcello Tommasi's statues. His name is in the file name and description. So you can't claim it has nothing to do with him. Same goes for the other images that your saying are "de minimis." The fact is that these images were clearly taken and uploaded to Commons because of Marcello Tommasi's work. Otherwise we could just blur it out, but then the pictures would be kind of worthless. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, in case it's just n. 1, 6 and 7 to discuss, the other ones we can   Speedy keep. For your question "if we were to blur out or otherwise remove the kids in the first image would be the same and/or still have been uploaded to Commons?" my answer is Yes, as my main focus was to portray the courtyard and the collection of gipsum in general, I could have made details for the bronzes if I wanted to focus on them. Btw in Italian "dello scultore" may mean "by the sculptor", yes, but also "belonging to the sculptor, sculptor's property", doesn't necessary mean he made all the statues (in fact he did not). --Sailko (talk) 09:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I never claimed he made all the statues. He doesn't need to for the images to copyrighted. Regardless, be my guest and blur his statues out of the images then. Otherwise I still think they should be deleted. We'll have to agree to disagree though. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I think I understand now what was misleading. Somebody in 2021 created the category "Marcello Tommasi (scultore)" - bad name btw, I moved to English - and added some images of the courtyard of his formed studio I had uploaded in 2014. So I understand now why you claimed they portray works of the artist as main subject. Who added the category selected the images quite randomly (including replicas of Classical art), but since there are no photos where the artist's work is the main subject I removed the category. We just need to decide if the "de minimis" rule can apply to those children bronzes, maybe somebody else's opinion could be useful, and see if it worths to edit the images with selective blurring. --Sailko (talk) 14:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh cool. That makes sense. Thanks for removing the category. I'm not super concered about it if they aren't connected and your telling me the intent of the photographs is mainly the courtyard. I originally thought it was the statues. But I guess it really doesn't matter since most of them aren't by him originally anyway. The important thing is that we know it and its documented somewhere like this DR. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Keep for sure number 4 and 5, in which the kids don't appear at all... But I'd say that I agree with Sailko also on the other images, they seem de minimis to me too. Letting aside cases as number 2 in which they are barely visible, also in the other images they are visibile mainly only as a profile, because they are black and in the shadow and they occupy only a small portion of the overall image.--Friniate (talk) 20:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Mural on Coronado Ave in Santa Teresa, San Jose 1747.jpg

edit

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uncontested by uploader. Best, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 13:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Vitraux de l'église Saint-Pierre de Crozon

edit

Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and although it's clear when or if the artists of these stained glass windows died, they were created in 1940s. So pretty it's unlikely the artist or artists have been dead for more then 70 years yet unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 04:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:NarNarGoon 1.jpg

edit

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Mount Jewett Heritage Mural

edit

No FoP for 2D artworks in USA. The mural was competed in 2007 by Kong Ho.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Job Guével

edit

Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of these stained glass windows, Job Guével, died in 2000. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2071.

Adamant1 (talk) 04:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Hulettia Fossil, from NewMexicoMuseum.png

edit

Image is from here.[2] While it is stated as public domain, as I see terms and conditions to use that is shown here,[3] it seems not showing public domain licence? There is "Fair use", but it is non-commercial only. Note that uploader Tnophelia expanded multiple articles with their own speculative, nothing cited false information, see this article for example.[4][5] Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 04:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Public domain" shown commons page is added by Tnophelia themselves, which makes this licence suspicious actually. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 04:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Stained-glass windows with signature of Pierre Arcencam

edit

Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of these stained glass windows, Pierre Arcencam, died in 1959. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2030, if not longer due to the URAA.

Adamant1 (talk) 04:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No objection against suppression. Thanks for adding the the artist's dates. --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Gabriel Loire

edit

Unfortunately FOP in the United States doesn't cover Artworks or sculptures, which stained glass windows qualify as. It's also not really clear when these windows were installed since that information isn't included with the files and the artist died in 1996. So there's no way to know which copyright status or term they would qualify for anyway. Whereas the rest of the images were created in France, which doesn't have FOP. So they are copyrighted until at least 2067.

Adamant1 (talk) 04:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What "surrounding architecture" is there in the first image? --Adamant1 (talk) 02:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The window is mounted into a building. That is the architecture. It is an allowable style element of the building. It also just occurred to me that these works are doubly allowed because they were installed prior to 1978 without a copyright notice, per {{PD-US-no notice}} and COM:PACUSA. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Stained-glass windows of Notre-Dame-de-Lourdes (Casablanca)

edit

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Morocco and the artist of these stained glass windows, Gabriel Loire, died in 1996. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2067.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Stained glass windows of Église Notre-Dame de Nogent-le-Rotrou by Gabriel Loire

edit

Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of these stained glass windows, Gabriel Loire, died in 1996. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2067.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Paul Bony

edit

Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of these stained glass windows, Paul Bony, died in 1982. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2053.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint-Lô d'Ourville Église Saint-Lô Baie 0 Verrière du Calvair 2022 08 22.jpg is actually a window from 1540 (see description) with restorations done by Paul Bony. This is covered by {{FOP-France}}. All this has been properly documented and described on the description page. Why was this included in this DR? --AFBorchert (talk) 06:58, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The file has a category for the stained glass artist Paul Bony who clearly wasn't around in 1540 because he died in 1982. So either the file description or category is wrong. I don't really care which, but they can't both be right and I couldn't find any indication anywhere about who the original artist was or what exactly he has to do with it. So at least IMO we should defer to COM:PCP unless you know the details and just didn't include them or something. "restored and completed" is also pretty ambigious. "Completed" could mean anything from Paul Bony adding their own elements to recreating an original drawing or something. If it's the former though then the part specifically by Paul Bony would clearly be copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:08, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Adamant1: Please make yourself familiar with COM:DM France and COM:FOP France. Both are referenced to in the image description. Quote:
French case law admits an exception if the copyrighted artwork is "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject" (CA Paris, 27 octobre 1992, Antenne 2 c/ société Spadem, « la représentation d'une œuvre située dans un lieu public n'est licite que lorsqu'elle est accessoire par rapport au sujet principal représenté ou traité »). Thus ruling #567 of March 15, 2005 of the Court of Cassation denied the right of producers of works of arts installed in a public plaza over photographs of the whole plaza.
See, for example, File:Louvre at night centered.jpg. The main subject in my photograph is the window from 1540. I am unable to photograph it without having the work by Paul Bony included. Such cases are permitted in France. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe its because I'm from the United States but ""accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject" doesn't sound like a completed window would qualify for that part of the law since the window is "an accessory to the main subject" of the image or artwork ts the actual subject. Especially since we don't how much of it was complete before it was finished by Paul Bony or what he added. Like if someone draws the rough outline of a person and I then "complete" it by filling the person in and drawing a room around them I haven't an "accessory to the main subject" at that point. Otherwise shared works wouldn't a thing. The copyright would just default to whomever drew the first line of hair or whatever. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is mainly a window from 1540, nearly 500 years ago. Stained glass windows do not stay in prime condition for these extended periods of time. You constantly need careful restorations and when there is a part missing it needs to be replaced. This has been done here by Paul Bony but the main artist is from the 16th century. We do know exactly what in this window is original and what not. The relevant literature is cited in the file description: Martine Callias Bey and Véronique David: Les vitraux de Basse-Normandie, ISBN 2-84706-240-8, pp. 165–166. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm aware of how windows work. The description litterally says that Paul Bony "completed" the window though. Not that he fixed a chip on the corner of it that already exited and was just damaged or something. Regardless, that inherently insinuates that it wasn't finished before Paul Bony worked on it and the work wasn't minor restoration with a wet squiggy to remove some dirt or whatever. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Again, this window was complete and finished before. But some parts of the upper lights and other details did not survive (they were severely damaged in 1944 during the invasion in Normandy, see Palissy record) and were then replaced afterwards. The file description summarizes what is original and what not. Quote: “The Virgin and Saint John in the Crucifixion scene are original, likewise the ecclesiastical donors in the left und right Saint Paul and the ecclesiastical donor in the right light.” This means that the main part was just restored but is otherwise original from the 16th century. Jesus Christ at the cross and some accessory elements (including the angels, Father in Heaven with the dove) are the works by Paul Bony. Please have also a look at the description at Palissy which likewise describes exactly what is original and what not. In summary, this still remains a significant 16th-century window where some minor parts have been replaced. It is impossible to photograph the 16th-century elements without including the additions by Paul Bony. Hence, {{FoP-France}} applies. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jesus Christ at the cross and some accessory elements (including the angels, Father in Heaven with the dove) are the works by Paul Bony. That's like 30% of the window though. So it's clearly not de minus. Nor does that much of the window being created by Paul Bony support your claim that it was complete and he just wiped some dirt off of it or whatever. Regardless, if 30% of the window was created by Paul Bony then it's clearly copyrighted. It's not our issue that the rest can't be photographed without including the part by him. Otherwise you could always just blur it out. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The percentage does not matter, it just needs to be incidental in regard to the main subject according to French case law. Please do not mix this up with the interpretation of de minimis in the United States. --AFBorchert (talk) 09:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The main subject here is the window though. Not just the part of the window that was created in 1540. Otherwise there's reason you wouldn't support blurring out the part of it created by Paul Bony. It seems like you want to have it both ways though where the subject is clearly "the window" but just not the large part of it that happens to be copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the tracery window is actually older, probably from the 14th-century, just the stained glass was installed in the 16th century. --AFBorchert (talk) 11:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Honestly, I could really care less either way. I was just going by the wording in the description and book you cited. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Tristan Ruhlmann

edit

Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of these stained glass windows, Tristan Ruhlmann, died in 1982. So these windows are copyrighted until at least 2053.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Gänget vid Böckaregatan i Ystad 2019.jpg

edit

This file was initially tagged by Jonnmann as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: people don't want to be in the picture Jonnmann (talk) 05:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of them look like they didn't want to be in the picture looking at it. Please address this in terms of Commons:Project scope as that is the criteria that needs to be addressed for how it is out of scope.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have been contacted by one of the people in the picture, who wants the picture to be deleted. Unfortunately, there may be legal consequences for me, because the person now does not want to be in the picture, for me it is perfectly fine for it to be deleted - Jonnmann (talk) 10:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I'm trying to get one of my pictures deleted, the perons in the picture can be identified, and I want the picture deleted from Wikipedia and the Commons image base.

And I can't find the right template, can I get help with that.

File:Gänget vid Böckaregatan i Ystad 2019.jpg

Regards - User Jonnmann on Swedish Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonnmann (talk • contribs) 20:43, 28 June 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm trying to get one of my pictures deleted, the perons in the picture can be identified, and I want the picture deleted from Wikipedia and the Commons image base. And I can't find the right template, can I get help with that. File:Gänget vid Böckaregatan i Ystad 2019.jpg Regards - User Jonnmann on Swedish Wikipedia 213.113.106.69 20:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete Although the people in the photo don't seem to mind being in the photo, they have not given their consent to the photo being published on Wikimedia Commons, and at least one of them have even said that they did not consent to this. (See COM:PHOTOCONSENT). /abbedabbtalk 20:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Stained glass windows with signature of Henri Curcier in Église Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption de Lanquais

edit

Unfortunately there's no FOP in France, these files don't include the date of creation for the windows, and I couldn't find any information about the artist Henri Curcier. So these images should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless someone can figure out when or if Henri Curcier died.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Stained glass windows of Église Saint-Pierre-ès-Liens (Lalinde)

edit

Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and it's not really clear who created these stained glass windows or when they were created. So the image should be delete per COM:PCP unless someone can figure out who the artist is and/or when the windows were created.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. Ce vitrailliste a été actif entre 1895 et 1903 : voir en 1895, fin 19e, en 1899, en 1902, entre 1896 et 1903. S'il n'y a pas de date, ça ne veut pas dire que c'est récent ! Père Igor (talk) 08:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If there is no date, that does not mean that it is recent! Of course not, but then the opposite is also true and we can't host files that lack information about when the work was created or who created it either. There's really nothing inherently "old" about stained glass windows. It's not like they are ancient artifacts from the Roman Empire or whatever. There's plenty of modern ones. So their origin needs to be documented for images of them to be hosted on Commons just like any other type of work. These and similar images don't just get a special pass from the guidelines "because window." --Adamant1 (talk) 22:08, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
D'après Wikidata, il serait mort en 1919. Il me semble donc que cette demande de suppression est non fondée. Père Igor (talk) 15:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just an FYI, but Wikidata says that because I created the entry after you provided me with his biographical information. Both of which you were free to do at the time of upload. The DR was perfectly founded when I created it though since the information wasn't readily available at that point. That said, I'm totally fine if this is closed as keep now that we know when Henri Curcier died. Not to point fingers, but it's on the person who uploads this stuff to document the origin of it at the time of upload. Not leave it up to others to do 14 years later. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please add the identity of the artist to the image descriptions! Herbert Ortner (talk) 07:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Antoine Bessac

edit

Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of these stained glass windows, Antoine Bessac, died in 1974. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2045.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No objection against removing. Thanks for finding the artist's dates. --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Saint Korentin.tif

edit

Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of this stained glass window, Édouard Mahé, died in 1992. So this image is copyrighted until at least 2063. Adamant1 (talk) 06:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Captura de pantalla 2022-09-21 225347.png

edit

Obvious screenshot of non-free media 2407:7000:88E2:900:E86B:B346:7E0:1C78 07:18, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Terrapin Crossroads sign.jpg

edit

Derivative work of en:File:Grateful_Dead_-_Terrapin_Station.jpg#Licensing, blurring would make the file useless Ⳑ (talk) 07:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Étretat - Falaise d'aval.jpg

edit

Not in public domain. The author was alive few years ago, ie not dead since more than 70 years. No permission given Zen 38 (talk) 07:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of the Great Ming.jpg

edit

It is not own work, but an unacknowledged copy of File:明成祖時期疆域.png Kanguole (talk) 08:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Administrative Divisions and Military Protectorates of the Ming Dynasty.jpg

edit

It is not own work, but an unacknowledged adjustment of File:Ming divisions.png Kanguole (talk) 08:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Escobar Map.jpg

edit

apparent copyvio : from the mentioned source, defactoborders.org/places/san-escobar Altenmann (talk) 08:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, on the map, we can read : Creatives Commons attributions-Noncommercial 4.0. Yuilo (talk) 09:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Noncommercial" means we cannot have it. Altenmann (talk) 09:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh... I was convinced that the term "non-commercial" meant that it could be used except for commercial purposes. And since wikipedia isn't commercial... Yuilo (talk) 09:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes . https://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en Yuilo (talk) 09:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agrupación 1969, Córdoba.webp

edit

The photo was previously published in this article. There are doubts that Evelyn Diamante/Prensa Obrera is the author. 0x0a (talk) 08:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tienes razón! He cometido un error al subirla sin chequearlo.--Mister Roboto (talk) 22:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michaela Škultéty (2022).jpg

edit

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Michaela_%C5%A0kult%C3%A9ty_(2022).jpg 87.6.202.31 09:18, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023-09-24 Aquarium Rhodes 3.jpg

edit

Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tut mir leid, ich versteh das nicht, das ist eins von etlichen in Commons hochgeladenen Fotos des Aquariums, bei denen es kein Copyrightproblem gibt. Viele Grüße --Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 10:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:2023-09-24 Aquarium Rhodes 2.jpg

edit

Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Biblioteca Municipală „Radu Rosetti” Onești.jpg

edit

Recent building. No FOP in Romania. Gikü (talk) 10:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SR-English Electric R.E.L. Maunsell designed diesel electric 350hp 0-6-0 shunter No.15202.jpg

edit

This file was initially tagged by Andy Dingley as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:English Electric 15202 (8254881761).jpg background colouratrion different from scan of old work; same underlying image iwth correction  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •   Delete These are effectively the same image, for all of our useful purposes. I agree that there are some technical variations in colour, but these aren't deliberate or useful.
I don't care which we keep, if anyone should care, but we don't need both. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
edit

If it's from the early 20th century, it's not own work, and we need a year and source to confirm any sort of anonymous license. Prosfilaes (talk) 11:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hohlbeinpferdchen ZontaSaysNo.jpg

edit

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 11:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anis-khan with Barak Obama -WBLN- world-business logistics network.jpg

edit

Fake image. Can't find the original but there are many edits of this with different photos in the frame, and websites that use it as a template, eg. https://photofunia.com/effects/obama Belbury (talk) 11:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akhilesh Yadav CMO Cropped.jpg

edit

Source file deleted ShaanSenguptaTalk 11:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also metadata shows some Parth Sanyal as copyright holder. ShaanSenguptaTalk 11:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Verne - En Magellanie.djvu

edit

This work dates from 1987 and is not in the public domain. See:https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_utilisateur:DMontagne_en_r%C3%A9sidence#Droit_d'auteur_sur_En_Magellanie DMontagne en résidence (talk) 12:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This work is by Jules Verne, who died in 1905. It is a posthumous publication in 1987. And in 1987, Jules Verne was already in the Public Domain (1905 + 70). In that case, posthumous works enter the public domain 25 years after publication, so this work has been in the public domain since 2013 (Article L123-4 du Code de la Propriété intellectuelle). Hektor (talk) 12:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, the cover is not a work by Jules Verne and is subject to copyright indicated inside the book. Only the content is the 1987 edition of an original manuscript by Jules Verne which had not been published before. Enrevseluj (talk) 22:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment the file can be kept but some pages (the cover and the preface) needs to be blanked (and the history purged). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 09:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The file has been cleaned up thanks to other Wikisource contributors. Hektor (talk) 21:15, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've already deleted the older version of the file with the copyrighted parts.
I'm still wondering about the templates {{PD-old-100}} and {{PD-US-unpublished}}, they don't seem to be exactly be correct/precise enough.
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 10:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I am not very familiar with the procedures. Knowing very well those who have the copyright registered, would you like me to ask their permission so that the file (cover) can be reproduced? Enrevseluj (talk) 23:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The cover has very little value from Wikisource standpoint (this is not an aesthetic judgement !). I think the file is fine as is without the image. Hektor (talk) 06:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Enrevseluj: there is little harm in asking. That said, it can be a lot of work, so it's up to you (and maybe they can release the preface too). The procedure is here Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/fr (with an example of permission). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's coming to the holidays so there may not be an answer but I'll try. Good to you. Enrevseluj (talk) 00:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks. Enrevseluj (talk) 00:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hulettia Fossil, from NewMexicoMuseum cropped.png

edit

Problematic licence of original image, see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Hulettia_Fossil,_from_NewMexicoMuseum.png. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 12:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ONEINMIND (1).jpg

edit

Vertically distorted version of File:ONEINMIND.jpg. Unneeded. Marbletan (talk) 13:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wir verstehen den Antrag auf Löschung des ONE IN MIND Beitrages. Die Band ist zu unbedeutend, um bei Wikipedia zu erscheinen. ONE IN MIND (talk) 13:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Otto Sander Tischbein (Foto Carsta Off - Städtische Sammlungen Kamenz).png

edit

Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes werk", ist jedoch Foto Carsta Off - Städtische Sammlungen Kamenz Lutheraner (talk) 14:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dark Areola Close Up.jpg

edit

Unnecessary Deutronomous (talk) 14:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FangCity.jpg

edit

Not own work, at least not entirely. Image is a montage of works by several authors. Top-left image is from [6] and credited to Chartchai Neng Chaiyasuko. Lower-left image is from [7] by ณัฎฐพล เทพวงค์. Paul_012 (talk) 15:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chabel high school.jpg

edit

Tiene mal el nombre Josbel1980 (talk) 15:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  Comment Deletion requested by the uploader shortly after upload, but file is still COM:INUSE at es:Chabel. --Rosenzweig τ 07:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Super Mario World 2 Yoshi's Island Logo.svg

edit

Possible copyvio: Logo of a video game above the threshold of originality, Pretty sure it is property of Nintendo CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hassanfuad-professional-entrepreneur 02.jpg

edit

I tagged this image for speedy deletion as G10 and uploader reverted my edit. I assume this means they object. I still consider this advertising. William Graham (talk) 16:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dylarazak92: Forgot to ping uploader. William Graham (talk) 21:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poor Jake's Demise (1913) - snippet.webm

edit

Probable hoax, it's another sockpuppet of Oatsandcream uploading a fragment of something and claiming it to be recovered footage of lost film (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Humor Risk Reconstruction (Marx Brothers).webm where some uncredited static images were presented as being from a lost Marx Brothers film, and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Palooka2 where a fake animation of a Lon Chaney action figure taken from YouTube was presented as a recovered fragment of London After Midnight).

SPI opened at enwiki, at en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oatsandcream.

The video here is just taken from somebody's personal year-old two-uploads YouTube channel, and could be from some other Lon Chaney work. Belbury (talk) 16:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader has since been confirmed and globally blocked as a sockpuppet of Oatsandcream. Belbury (talk) 15:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ararat Mirzoyan and Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya.webp

edit

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 17:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson on Meet the Press.jpg

edit

There is a properly authored image by Michigan Department of State that should be the image that is available. Wrdwiz (talk) 17:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete, this is an unclear nomination but I think it is referring to the duplicate File:Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson on Meet the Press.jpg. However, both of these files are probable copyright violations. The description of this file is "Source – Own work; Author – Wrdwiz", and the other file has "Source – From the source; Author – Michigan Department of State". This is unlikely to be the uploader's own work as it is a posed photograph taken up-close in a TV studio. The author is more likely to be the TV company or someone in Jocelyn Benson's office. There is no evidence that either of these has assigned the CC0 license. There is a rule that works of the US Federal Government are public domain, but this does not apply to US states. w:en:Copyright status of works by subnational governments of the United States does not give a specific rule for Michigan. The image is on Benson's Linked-In account.[8] Delete both files. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Radhakrishnan Dhanarajan.jpg

edit

Der unbekannte Fotograf 186.175.1.22 17:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carum carvi 15-p.bot-carum.carvi-09.jpg

edit

Not educationally useful, since the image quality is to low. Wkee4ager (talk) 18:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep. I agree that this isn't a great photo, but it's part of a notable collection (Category:Botanical collection of Université Laval) which is better off as a complete collection than a partial one. Omphalographer (talk) 21:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Delete. There is a better picture of flower for this species (File:Carum_carvi_15-p.bot-carum.carvi-11.jpg), there is no need to keep this one. --Cephas (talk) 19:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Naruro

edit
  1. File:Tobyl.jpg
  2. File:Rudnyi.jpg
  3. File:Fdr.kst.kazakhstan.jpg
  4. File:Стела-баннер "Рудный".jpg
  5. File:Мечеть "Нұр".jpg
  6. File:Vophddry6.jpg
  7. File:Aktobe Region, Kazakhstan.jpg
  8. File:XmRNyvsA.jpg

Copyright violation. 1 – photo by Qostanai.Media [9], 2 – photo by Rýdnyi media [10], 3 – photo by local news in Qostanay [11], 4-5 – photos by Wild Ticket [12], 6 – a still frame from this video, 7 – [13], 8 – photo by DXT 1 [14]

  1. File:15117616 40 0 3298 2048 1920x0 80 0 0 60f1e9449e92d6fbee79d88bed962d5d.jpg

Probably a copyvio. I couldn't find the exact image but this seems pretty similar. Radmir Far (talk) 19:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. File:Флаг Костанайской области Казахстана.png
  2. File:Emblem Tobyl.png
  3. File:Тобыл.png

I am not a vexillologist but these flags seem fictional to me. Radmir Far (talk) 20:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Octonox Group Logo.jpg

edit

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside wikidata, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •   Comment. Use in Wikidata is within scope. There is a good chance this Wikidata entry should be deleted, but this file should not be deleted for scope reasons until it is. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dany - panoramio (1).jpg

edit

common picture of dog, no value Patrik Kunec (talk) 20:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dany - panoramio (2).jpg

edit

common picture of dog, no value Patrik Kunec (talk) 20:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:My Dany - panoramio.jpg

edit

common picture of dog, no value Patrik Kunec (talk) 20:04, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:My little yorkshire Rocky - panoramio (1).jpg

edit

common picture of dog, no value Patrik Kunec (talk) 20:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

edit

Offensichtliche Fehlllizenzierung - Urheber kann nur eine natürliche Person sein Lutheraner (talk) 20:58, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das copyright des Fotos liegt bei AUREUM Saxophon Quartett.
Die Aktualisierung des Fotos ist deshalb wichtig, weil die Besetzung des Ensembles sich verändert hat. AUREUM Saxophon Quartett (talk) 21:08, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cropped-Hive80-Logo-Final-Horizontal-FullColor.png

edit

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep now blocked; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:This is Earth in the next 100 years if we don't act on climate change - Ways to Change the World.webm

edit

According to the credits at the bottom of the footage, the WEF is not the creator of these clips Trade (talk) 21:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. Somebody should probably also search/check the other WEF clips in that case. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vino photo Momcilo Stokanovic.jpg

edit

Because it is totally blurry Waleedmhanif (talk) 19:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Test by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 19:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vino photo Momcilo Stokanovic.jpg

edit

Quite COM:PACK, isn't it? 186.175.74.9 22:04, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:City of Brooklyn Park official seal.jpg

edit

This is a non-free, copyrighted file shared under an incorrect license. Darth Stabro (talk) 22:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brooklyn Park New Flag.svg

edit

Non-free image: https://www.brooklynpark.org/communications/logos/ Darth Stabro (talk) 22:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grooming (cropped).png

edit

Very low quality crop of the 12:30, 1 July 2011 version of File:Martin Van Maele - La Grande Danse macabre des vifs - 13.jpg which has been replaced with a superior version since. This is because File:Grooming.png is already a montage from three images sourced directly from Commons. Should be merged as duplicate. Nutshinou Talk! 23:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Perry Barlow, Nicki Scully, and Jerilyn Lee Brandelius at Rock Scully Memorial with vintage Stealie Flag.JPG

edit

Derivative work of the Grateful Dead logo. Could be blurred as it depicts John Perry Barlow Ⳑ (talk) 23:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/06/26&oldid=892238661"