Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Srinesh.saravanan

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Srinesh.saravanan}} to the checkuser page . Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Srinesh.saravanan

Status:  to be archived • view • edit • history • watch
Filed: 17:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

• Srinesh.saravanan (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Suspected related users

• Royal Family Meghan (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Yashooda (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Muralikrishna m (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Rationale, discussion and results

Reason: After user Yashooda blocked user Royal Family Meghan stated to upload same type of images and user Muralikrishna m too engged in same edits and uploads. There user interests are same category - uploading indian celebrities images and not bother about copyvios. ~AntanO4task (talk) 17:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

• Confirmed is Royal Family Meghan, also Shristy.Rhodee and Sameera.Reddy1502.
• Declined is Muralikrishna m. Please review the instructions at COM:RFCU: "Evidence is required. When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related." (underline in original) You failed to do this for either account (I checked Royal Family Meghan based on my familiarity with the master--which you missed despite Yashooda being tagged--and copyvios of w:Aditi Shankar--e.g,, Royal Family Meghan, Nandhini.Iyer, Maheswari Namibayar, etc.) but will not construct a case for you for Muralikrishna m. Note, for example: a) Muralikrishna m is over 2-years-old, with more than 15,000 edits to te.wiki, and is in good standing (contradicts timing reference); and b) has never appeared in the numerous previous checks. Эlcobbola _talk 18:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

  See also this warning regarding repeated failure to provide evidence. This needs to stop. Эlcobbola _talk 18:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
  Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.