Revision as of 09:00, 22 May 2014 edit Myrvin (talk \| contribs) 6,472 edits Take out contradiction. Trying to make sense of it. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:52, 22 May 2014 edit undo Myrvin (talk \| contribs) 6,472 edits r.→‎History: Clearer. Next edit →
Line 41: == History == During the 18th and 19th centuries, various episodes of the Bible (for example the [[Genesis flood narrative\|Noahide worldwide flood]],<ref>Plimer, Ian (1994), ''Telling Lies for God: Reason vs Creationism'', Random House</ref> the [[Genesis creation narrative\|creation in six days]], and the [[Adam and Eve\|creation of women from a man's rib]]) began increasingly to be seen as legendary. This led to ~~an increasing~~further questioning ~~as to~~of the veracity of Biblical texts. According to an article in ''Theology Today'' published in 1975, "There have been long periods in the history of the church when biblical inerrancy has not been a critical question. It has in fact been noted that only in the last two centuries can we legitimately speak of a formal doctrine of inerrancy. The arguments pro and con have filled many books, and almost anyone can join in the debate".<ref name="infallible">{{cite journal\|last=Coleman\|journal=Theology Today\| volume = 31\|issue = 4\|year=1975\|title=Biblical Inerrancy: Are We Going Anywhere?\|doi=10.1177/004057367503100404\|first1=R. J.\|pages=295}}</ref> In the 1970s and '80s, however, the debate in theological circles, which centered on the issue of whether or not the Bible was [[Biblical infallibility\|infallible]] or both infallible and inerrant, came into the spotlight. Some notable Christian [[seminary\|seminaries]], such as [[Princeton Theological Seminary]] and [[Fuller Theological Seminary]], were formally adopting the doctrine of infallibility while rejecting the doctrine of inerrancy.

Biblical inerrancy: Difference between revisions