Revision as of 19:43, 5 August 2015 edit Jimnall (talk \| contribs) 1 edit m refute that the bible contains scientific errors. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:57, 5 August 2015 edit undo Evensteven (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 5,240 edits Undid revision 674731263 by Jimnall (talk) one "citation needed" is enough; looks like a content edit was intended, but its nature was not made clear Next edit →
Line 186: === Scientific and historical criticism === {{See also\|Criticism of the Bible\|Internal consistency of the Bible\|Science and the Bible\|The Bible and history}} Biblical inerrancy has been criticized on the grounds that many statements that are found in Scripture, if taken literally, rather than phenomenologically, are untenable or contradictory {{citation needed\|date=July 2015}}. Many (although not all) of these instances, involve the Bible's relationship with [[history]] or [[science]] {{citation needed\|date=July 2015}}~~{{citation needed\|reason=Here are examples where this assertion is false. Please read http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Biblical_scientific_errors \|date=August 2015}}~~ . === Theological criticism ===

Biblical inerrancy: Difference between revisions