Revision as of 19:36, 20 March 2015 edit 91.120.165.9 (talk) →‎Textus Receptus ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:44, 23 March 2015 edit undo Blainster (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 33,319 edits →‎Textus Receptus: rv strange entry, & redundant "it should be noted' Next edit →
Line 99: ==== Textus Receptus ==== Similar to the King James Only view is the view that [[King James Only#Similar Movements in Non-English Speaking Countries\|translations must be derived from]] the [[Textus Receptus]] in order to be considered inerrant. As the King James Version is an English translation, this leaves speakers of other languages in a difficult position, hence the belief in the Textus Receptus as the inerrant source text for translations to modern languages. For example, in Spanish-speaking cultures the commonly accepted "KJV-equivalent" is the [[Reina-Valera]] 1909 revision (with different groups accepting, in addition to the 1909 or in its place, the revisions of 1862 or 1960). ~~It should also be noted that partially the~~The [[New King James Version]] was also translated from the Textus Receptus. == Justifications ==

Biblical inerrancy: Difference between revisions