Biblical inerrancy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎After Vatican II: remove external link in text
Line 252:
Some theologians and apologists defend the view that total inerrancy is still the Church's teaching. For instance, articles defending this position can be found in the 2011 collection ''For the Sake of Our Salvation''.<ref>{{cite book|editor=Scott Hahn|title=For the sake of our Salvation|series=Letter and Spirit Journal #6|publisher=Emmaus Road|year=2011}}</ref>
 
On a more popular level, at ''Catholic Answers'' (https://www.catholic.com), a website and podcast with a strongly apologetical bent that calls itself “the world's largest database of answers about the beliefs and practices of the Catholic faith” there is no lack of articles defending the same position, with titles such as “Is Scripture Inerrant?”<ref>https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/is-scripture-inerrant</ref>, “The Accuracy of Scripture”<ref>https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/the-accuracy-of-scripture</ref>, “Is everything in the Bible True?”<ref>https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/is-everything-in-the-bible-true</ref> and “Is the Bible's Inerrancy Limited to Matters Pertaining to Salvation?”<ref>https://www.catholic.com/qa/is-the-bibles-inerrancy-limited-to-matters-pertaining-to-salvation</ref>
 
But the majority view among today's Catholic theologians and Scripture scholars is that ''Dei Verbum'' has indeed replaced total inerrancy with inerrancy limited to matters of salvation.