Content deleted Content added
Editor2020 (talk | contribs) Undid revision 1073866585 by Editor2020 (talk) self revert |
Editor2020 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 47:
In the 1970s and 1980s, some notable Protestant [[seminary|seminaries]], such as [[Princeton Theological Seminary]] and [[Fuller Theological Seminary]], heretofore defenders of total inerrancy, formally adopted inerrancy restricted to theological matters (what some authors now call "infallibility"). Fuller, for instance, explained:<blockquote>Where inerrancy refers to what the [[Holy Spirit in Christianity|Holy Spirit]] is saying to the churches through the biblical writers, we support its use. Where the focus switches to an undue emphasis on matters like chronological details, precise sequence of events, and numerical allusions, we would consider the term misleading and inappropriate.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://fuller.edu/About/Mission-and-Values/What-We-Believe-and-Teach/|title=What We Believe and Teach|website=Fuller Theological Seminary|language=en|archive-url=https://perma.cc/7QDT-R7ZM|archive-date=21 October 2017|url-status=live|access-date=21 October 2017|df=dmy-all}}{{cbignore}}</ref></blockquote>
The other side of this debate focused largely around the magazine ''[[Christianity Today]]'' and the book entitled ''The Battle for the Bible'' by Harold Lindsell.<ref>Lindsell, Harold. ''The Battle for the Bible. '' Zondervan, 1978. {{ISBN|978-0-310-27681-4}}</ref> The author{{who}} asserted that losing the doctrine of the inerrancy of scripture was the thread that would unravel the church and [[Christian fundamentalism|Conservative Christians]] rallied behind this idea.
This was among the controversies during the [[Southern Baptist Convention conservative resurgence]]; the 2000 edition of the ''[[Baptist Faith and Message]]'' states that “all Scripture is totally true and trustworthy” while avoiding the use of the terms "inerrant” or “infallible”.
| |||