Biblical inerrancy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 50:
{{quote|For I confess to your Charity that I have learned to yield this respect and honour only to the canonical books of Scripture: of these alone do I most firmly believe that the authors were completely free from error. And if in these writings I am perplexed by anything which appears to me opposed to truth, I do not hesitate to suppose that either the {{abbr|manuscript|Ms.}} is faulty, or the translator has not caught the meaning of what was said, or I myself have failed to understand it. As to all other writings, in reading them, however great the superiority of the authors to myself in sanctity and learning, I do not accept their teaching as true on the mere ground of the opinion being held by them; but only because they have succeeded in convincing my judgment of in truth either by means of these canonical writings themselves, or by arguments addressed to my reason|''Letters of St Augustine'' 82.3}}
 
Biblical inerrancy adherents say that the earlyEarly churchChurch fathersFathers did hold to biblical inerrancy, even if it was not articulated that way. In particular, Shawn Nelson cites [[Clement of Rome]], Papias, Ignatius of Antioch, [[the Shepherd of Hermas]], the [[Didache]], and the [[Epistle to Diognetus]] as examples of those whom held to inerrancy.<ref name=Nelson>Nelson, Shawn. "A Voice from a New Generation: What's at Stake?", in ''Vital Issues in the Inerrancy Debate'', Wipf and Stock, 2015, 28. </ref> In particular, Shawn Nelson cites [[Clement of Rome]], Papias, Ignatius of Antioch, the Shepherd of Hermas, the Didache, and the Epistle to Diognestus as examples of those whom held to inerrancy.
 
=== Reformation era ===