Biblical inerrancy: Difference between revisions

 

[[Daniel B. Wallace]], Professor of New Testament at [[Dallas Theological Seminary]], divides the various evidences into two approaches: deductive and inductive approaches.<ref>[http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=4200 My Take on Inerrancy], [http://www.bible.org/ bible.org] website</ref>

 

<blockquote>I feel great pity for Bart Ehrman. It appears that the kind of fundamentalism in which the Christian believer turned biblical debunker was raised did not prepare him for the challenges he would face in college. He was taught, rightly, that there are no contradictions in the Bible, but he was trained, quite falsely, to interpret the non-contradictory nature of the Bible in modern, scientific, post-Enlightenment terms. That is to say, he was encouraged to test the truth of the Bible against a verification system that has only existed for some 250 years.<ref name="Markos 2014">{{cite web | last=Markos | first=Louis | title=Ehrman Errant | website=First Things | date=27 October 2014 | url=https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2014/10/ehrman-errant | access-date=18 July 2019}}</ref></blockquote>