Christianity and Judaism: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
grammar change
(18 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 3:
{{Christianity}}
{{Judaism}}
Christianity [[Jewish Christian|began as a movement]] within [[Second Temple Judaism]], but the two religions gradually [[Split of early Christianity and Judaism|diverged over the first few centuries]] of the [[Christian Eraera]]. Today, differences of opinion vary between denominations in both religions, but the most important distinction is Christian acceptance and Jewish non-acceptance of [[Jesus]] as the [[Messiah]] prophesied in the [[Hebrew Bible]] and Jewish tradition. [[Early Christianity]] distinguished itself by determining that observance of [[halakha]] (Jewish law) was not necessary for non-Jewish converts to Christianity (Seesee [[Pauline Christianity]]). Another major difference is the two religions' conceptions of God. TheDepending on the denomination followed, the Christian God is either believed to [[Trinity|consistsconsist of three persons of one essence]] (Father, Son and Holy Spirit), with the doctrine of the [[Incarnation (Christianity)|incarnation]] of the Son in Jesus being of special importance., or like Judaism, believes in and emphasizes the [[Shema Yisrael|Oneness of God]]. and Judaism, however, rejects the Christian concept of [[God the Son|God in human form]]. While Christianity recognizes the [[Hebrew Bible]] (called the [[Old Testament]] by Christians) as part of its scriptural canon, Judaism does not recognize the Christian [[New Testament]].
 
The relative importance of belief and practice constitute an important area of difference. Most forms of [[Protestantism|Protestant Christianity]] emphasize correct belief (or [[orthodoxy]]), focusing on the [[New Covenant]] as [[Mediator (Christ as Mediator)|mediated]] through [[Jesus in Christianity|Jesus]] [[Christ (title)|Christ]],<ref name="bibleverse||Hebrews|8:6|NIV">{{bibleverse||Hebrews|8:6|NIV}}</ref> as recorded in the [[New Testament]]. Judaism places emphasis on correct conduct (or [[Orthopraxy#Judaism|orthopraxy]]),<ref>{{cite book |last=Jackson |first=Elizabeth |title=The Illustrated Dictionary of Culture |publisher=Lotus Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-81-89093-26-6 |pages= 147}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Westley |first=Miles |title=The Bibliophile's Dictionary |publisher=Writer's Digest Books |year=2005 |pages=91 |isbn=978-1-58297-356-2}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=McKim |first=Donald K. |title=Westminster Dictionary of Theological Terms |publisher=Westminster John Knox Press |year=1996 |pages=197 |isbn=978-0-664-25511-4}}</ref> focusing on the [[Mosaic covenant]], as recorded in the [[Torah]] and [[Talmud]]. Mainstream [[Roman Catholicism]] occupies a middle position, stating thethat both faith and works are factors in a person's salvation. Some schools of thought within Catholicism, such as [[Franciscanism]] and [[liberation theology]], explicitly favor orthopraxy over orthodoxy. [[Praxis (Byzantine Rite)|Praxis]] is of central importance to [[Eastern Christianity]] as well, with Saint [[Maximus the Confessor]] going as far as to say that "theology without action is the theology of demons."<ref>{{cite book|author=Ecumenical Association of Third World Theologians. International Conference|editor=Virginia Fabella|editor2= Sergio Torres|title=Doing Theology in a Divided World|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kF4cAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Theology+without+action+is+the+theology+of+demons%22|year=1985|publisher=Orbis Books|isbn=978-0-88344-197-8|page=15}}</ref><ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=_7VKAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA67 Paul W. Chilcote, ''Wesley Speaks on Christian Vocation''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170215172955/https://books.google.com/books?id=_7VKAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA67 |date=2017-02-15 }} (Wipf and Stock 2001 {{ISBN|978-1-57910812-0}}), p. 67</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.edinburgh2010.org/fileadmin/files/edinburgh2010/files/docs/Mission%20among%20Other%20Faiths_Orthodox%20Perspective%20090820.doc|title=Mission among Other Faiths: An Orthodox Perspective|access-date=2010-12-03|archive-date=2010-07-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100705205510/http://www.edinburgh2010.org/fileadmin/files/edinburgh2010/files/docs/Mission%20among%20Other%20Faiths_Orthodox%20Perspective%20090820.doc|url-status=live}}</ref> Christian conceptions of right practice vary (e.g., [[Catholic social teaching]] and its [[preferential option for the poor]]; the [[Eastern Orthodox Church]]'s practices of [[fasting]], [[hesychasm]], and [[asceticism]]; the [[Protestant work ethic]] of [[Calvinism|Calvinists]] and others), but differ from Judaism in that they are not based on following halakha or any other interpretation of the Mosaic covenant. While more [[World Union for Progressive Judaism|liberal Jewish denominations]] may not require observance of halakha, Jewish life remains centred on individual and collective participation in an eternal dialogue with God through tradition, rituals, [[Jewish prayer|prayers]] and [[Jewish ethics|ethical actions]].
 
==Jewish self-identification==
Line 16:
 
According to [[Christian theologian]] [[Alister McGrath]], the Jewish Christians affirmed every aspect of then contemporary [[Second Temple Judaism]] with the addition of the belief that Jesus was the messiah,<ref>McGrath, Alister E., Christianity: An Introduction. Blackwell Publishing (2006). {{ISBN|1-4051-0899-1}}. p. 174: "In effect, they [Jewish Christians] seemed to regard Christianity as an affirmation of every aspect of contemporary Judaism, with the addition of one extra belief—that Jesus is the Messiah. Unless males were [[Circumcision controversy in early Christianity|circumcised]], they could not be saved{{bibleverse||Acts|15:1}}.";see also [[Paleo-orthodoxy]]</ref> with Isaiah 49:6, "an explicit parallel to 42:6" quoted by [[Paul the Apostle]] in Acts 13:47<ref>Beale, Gregory K., Other Religions in New Testament Theology, in David Weston Baker, ed., ''Biblical faith and other religions: an evangelical assessment'', Kregel Academic, 2004, p. 85</ref> and reinterpreted by [[Justin Martyr]].<ref>McKeehan, James, ''An Overview of the Old Testament and How It Relates to the New Testament'', iUniverse, 2002, p. 265</ref><ref>Philippe Bobichon, "L'enseignement juif, païen, hérétique et chrétien dans l'œuvre de Justin Martyr", ''Revue des Études Augustiniennes'' 45/2 (1999), pp. 233-259 [https://www.academia.edu/7279724/_Lenseignement_juif_pa%C3%AFen_h%C3%A9r%C3%A9tique_et_chr%C3%A9tien_dans_l%C5%93uvre_de_Justin_Martyr_Revue_des_%C3%89tudes_Augustiniennes_45_2_1999_p_233_259 online]</ref> According to Christian writers, most notably Paul, the Bible teaches that people are, in their current state, [[sin]]ful,<ref>{{bibleverse||Romans|3:23}}</ref> and the [[New Testament]] reveals that Jesus is both the [[Son of man]] and the [[Son of God]], united in the [[hypostatic union]], [[God the Son]], [[God in Christianity|God]] made [[incarnate]];<ref>{{bibleverse||John|1:1}}, {{bibleverse||John|1:14}}, {{bibleverse||John|1:29}}</ref> that [[Crucifixion of Jesus|Jesus' death by crucifixion]] was a [[Atonement in Christianity|sacrifice to atone]] for all of humanity's sins, and that acceptance of Jesus as [[Christian soteriology|Savior]] and [[Hæland|Lord]] saves one from [[Divine Judgment]],<ref>{{bibleverse||John|5:24}}</ref> giving [[Eternal life (Christianity)|Eternal life]].<ref>{{bibleverse||John|3:16|NIV}}</ref> Jesus is the mediator of the New Covenant.<ref name="bibleverse||Hebrews|8:6|NIV"/> His famous [[Sermon on the Mount]] is considered by some Christian scholars<ref>See also [[Expounding of the Law#Antithesis of the Law|Antithesis of the Law]]</ref> to be the proclamation of the [[Ethics in religion#Christian ethics|New Covenant ethics]], in [[Typology (theology)|contrast]] to the [[Mosaic Covenant]] of [[Moses]] from [[Biblical Mount Sinai|Mount Sinai]].
 
But some scholars, like [[Margaret Barker]], propose that early Christianity has roots in [[First Temple]] [[Yahwism|Israelite religion]], which is dubbed as the "Temple Theology".<ref>Collinwood, Dean W. & James W. McConkie. (2006). [https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=3777&context=byusq 'Temple Theology: An Introduction' by Margaret Barker]. Provo, UT: [[BYU Studies Quarterly|BYU Studies]] 45:2 (May 2006).</ref> Baker's works have been criticized for engaging in [[parallelomania]] and failing to engage in the broader scholarly literature{{citation needed|date=May 2024}} but it has gained some religious and academic support.<ref name="Bench 2015">{{cite web |last=Turner |first=John G. |date=8 January 2015 |title=Why Mormons Love Margaret Barker |url=https://www.patheos.com/blogs/anxiousbench/2015/01/why-mormons-love-margaret-barker/ |access-date=5 December 2020 |website=Anxious Bench}}</ref><ref name="Schäfer 2020">{{cite book |last=Schäfer |first=Peter |url=https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691181325/two-gods-in-heaven |title=Two Gods in Heaven: Jewish Concepts of God in Antiquity |date=2020 |publisher=Princeton University Press |pages=143, n. 17}}</ref>
 
==Sacred texts==
Line 168 ⟶ 170:
===Shituf===
{{Main|Shituf}}
A minority Jewish view, which appears in some{{which|date= November 2018}} codes of [[halakha|Jewish law]], ismaintains that while Christian worship is polytheistic (due to the multiplicity of the Trinity), it is permissible for them to swear in God's name, since they are referring to the one God. This theology is referred to in [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]] as [[Shituf]] (literally "partnership" or "association"). Although worship of a trinity is considered to be not different from any other form of idolatry for Jews, it may be an acceptable belief for non-Jews (according to the ruling of some Rabbinic authorities).<ref>{{whoCite journal|dateurl=https://hcommons.org/deposits/download/hc:50798/CONTENT/shituf-article.pdf November|title=World 2018Religions and the Noahide Prohibition of Idolatry |author=Klein, Reuven Chaim|year=2022|journal=Journal of Halacha and Contemporary Society|volume=79|pages=109-167|DOI=10.17613/h2nz-ep07}}).</ref>
 
==Right action==
Line 205 ⟶ 207:
{{Main|Judaism and abortion|Christianity and abortion|Ensoulment#Judaism}}
{{more citations needed section|date=October 2021}}
The only statements in the Tanakh about the status of a fetus state that killing an unborn infant does not have the same status as killing a born human being, and mandates a much lesser penalty.<ref>Exodus 21: 22–25</ref><ref>Daniel Schiff, 2002, ''Abortion in Judaism'', Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. 9–11</ref> (althoughAlthough this interpretation is disputed,{{according to whom|date=October 2021}} the passage could refer to an injury to a woman that causes a premature, live birth).{{citation needed|date=October 2021}}
 
The Talmud states that the fetus is not yet a full human being until it has been born (either the head or the body is mostly outside of the woman), therefore killing a fetus is not murder, and abortion—in restricted circumstances—has always been legal under Jewish law. [[Rashi]], the great 12th century commentator on the Bible and Talmud, states clearly of the fetus ''lav nefesh hu'': "it is not a person". The Talmud contains the expression ''ubar yerech imo''—the fetus is as the thigh of its mother,' i.e., the fetus is deemed to be part and parcel of the pregnant woman's body." The Babylonian Talmud [[Yevamot]] 69b states that: "the embryo is considered to be mere water until the fortieth day." Afterwards, it is considered subhuman until it is born. Christians who agree with these views may refer to this idea as abortion before the [[quickening]] of the fetus.
Line 233 ⟶ 235:
===Taboo food and drink===
{{Main|Taboo food and drink|Kashrut}}
Orthodox Jews, unlike most Christians, still practice a restrictive diet that has many rules. Most Christians believe that the kosher food laws have been [[Supersessionism|superseded]],. forFor example, they cite what Jesus taught in [[Mark 7]]: what you eat doesn't make you unclean but what comes out of a man's heart makes him unclean—although Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy have their own set of dietary observances. [[Eastern Orthodoxy#Fasting|Eastern Orthodoxy, in particular has very elaborate and strict rules of fasting]], and continues to observe the [[Council of Jerusalem]]'s apostolic decree of Act 15.<ref>[[Karl Josef von Hefele]]'s [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf214.viii.v.iv.ii.html commentary on canon II of Gangra] notes: "We further see that, at the time of the Synod of [[Gangra]], the rule of the Apostolic Synod with regard to blood and things strangled was still in force. With the Greeks, indeed, it continued always in force as their Euchologies still show. [[Balsamon]] also, the well-known commentator on the canons of the Middle Ages, in his commentary on the sixty-third [[Canons of the Apostles|Apostolic Canon]], expressly blames the Latins because they had ceased to observe this command. What the Latin Church, however, thought on this subject about the year 400, is shown by [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]] in his work [[Contra Faustum]], where he states that the Apostles had given this command to unite the heathens and Jews in the one ark of Noah; but that then, when the barrier between Jewish and heathen converts had fallen, this command concerning things strangled and blood had lost its meaning, and was only observed by few. But still, as late as the eighth century, [[Pope Gregory III|Pope Gregory the Third]] (731) forbade the eating of blood or things strangled under threat of a penance of forty days. No one will pretend that the disciplinary enactments of any council, even though it be one of the undisputed [[Ecumenical council|Ecumenical Synods]], can be of greater and more unchanging force than the decree of that first council, held by the Holy Apostles at Jerusalem, and the fact that its decree has been obsolete for centuries in the West is proof that even Ecumenical canons may be of only temporary utility and may be repealed by disuse, like other laws."</ref>
 
Some Christian denominations observe some biblical food laws, for example, the practice of [[Ital]] in [[Rastafari]]. [[Jehovah's Witnesses]] do not eat blood products and are known for their refusal to accept [[blood transfusion]]s based on not "eating blood".
Line 374 ⟶ 376:
In 2012, the book ''[[Kosher Jesus]]'' by [[Orthodox Judaism|Orthodox]] [[Rabbi]] [[Shmuley Boteach]] was published. In it, he takes the position that Jesus was a wise and learned [[Torah]]-observant Jewish [[rabbi]]. Boteach says he was a beloved member of the Jewish community. At the same time, Jesus is said to have despised the [[Ancient Rome|Romans]] for their cruelty, and fought them courageously. The book states that the Jews had nothing whatsoever to do with the murder of Jesus, but rather that blame for his trial and killing lies with the Romans and [[Pontius Pilate]]. Boteach states clearly that he does not believe in Jesus as the Jewish [[Messiah]]. At the same time, Boteach argues that "Jews have much to learn from Jesus - and from Christianity as a whole - without accepting Jesus' divinity. There are many reasons for accepting Jesus as a man of great wisdom, beautiful ethical teachings, and profound Jewish patriotism."<ref name="auto3">{{Cite web|url=https://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/04/05/jews-reclaim-jesus-as-one-of-their-own/|title=Jews reclaim Jesus as one of their own|date=April 5, 2012|website=CNN|author=Richard Allen Greene|access-date=26 February 2021|archive-date=26 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210226195211/https://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/04/05/jews-reclaim-jesus-as-one-of-their-own/|url-status=dead}}</ref> He concludes by writing, as to [[Judeo-Christian values]], that "the hyphen between Jewish and Christian values is Jesus himself."<ref name=more>{{Cite web|url=https://www.christianpost.com/news/koshering-jesus-more-an-evangelical-review-of-shmuley-boteachs-kosher-jesus.html|title=Koshering Jesus More: An Evangelical Review of Shmuley Boteach's 'Kosher Jesus'|author=Paul de Vries|date=March 23, 2012|website=[[Christian Post]]}}</ref>
 
On 3 December 2015, the [[Center for Jewish-Christian Understanding and Cooperation]] (CJCUC) spearheaded a petition of Orthodox rabbis from around the world calling for increased partnership between Jews and Christians.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/55561/groundbreaking-petition-signed-leading-rabbis-calls-increased-partnership-between-jews-christians-biblical-zionism/|title=Groundbreaking Petition Signed by Leading Rabbis Calls for Increased Partnership Between Jews and Christians|first=Adam Eliyahu|last=Berkowitz|publisher=Breaking Israel News|date=7 December 2015|access-date=29 October 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170420062605/https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/55561/groundbreaking-petition-signed-leading-rabbis-calls-increased-partnership-between-jews-christians-biblical-zionism/|archive-date=20 April 2017|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/national/modern-orthodox-leaders-bless-interfaith-dialogue|title=Modern Orthodox Leaders Bless Interfaith Dialogue|first=Steve|last=Lipman|work=[[The Jewish Week]]|date=8 December 2015|access-date=29 October 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160620040507/http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/national/modern-orthodox-leaders-bless-interfaith-dialogue|archive-date=20 June 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.post-gazette.com/news/nation/2015/12/11/Vatican-Orthodox-rabbis-issue-interfaith-statements-affirming-each-other-s-faith/stories/201512110164|title=Vatican, Orthodox rabbis issue interfaith statements affirming each other's faith|first=Peter|last=Smith|newspaper=[[Pittsburgh Post-Gazette]]|date=11 December 2015|access-date=29 October 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/towards-jewish-christian-reconciliation_b_9133926 |title=Towards Jewish-Christian Reconciliation & Partnership | first=Rabbi Shmuly | last=Yanklowitz| work=[[HuffPost]] |date=3 February 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.jpost.com/Blogs/Intellectual-Judaism/Mutual-Judeo-Christian-spiritual-foundation-of-Judaism-and-Christianity-444183|title=Mutual Judeo-Christian spiritual foundation of Judaism and Christianity|first=Vladimir|last=Minkov|newspaper=[[The Jerusalem Post]]|date=7 February 2016|access-date=29 October 2016}}</ref><ref name="vaticanradio">{{cite web |url=http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2015/12/10/orthodox_rabbis_issue_groundbreaking_statement_on_christians/1193458|title=Orthodox Rabbis issue groundbreaking statement on Christianity|publisher=[[Vatican Radio]]|date=10 December 2015|access-date=29 October 2016}}</ref>{{overciteexcessive citations inline|date=April 2023}}
The unprecedented [[Center for Jewish-Christian Understanding and Cooperation#Orthodox Rabbinic Statement on Christianity|Orthodox Rabbinic Statement on Christianity]], entitled ''"To Do the Will of Our Father in Heaven: Toward a Partnership between Jews and Christians"'', was initially signed by over 25 prominent Orthodox rabbis in Israel, the United States, and Europe,<ref name="vaticanradio" /> and as of 2016 had over 60 signatories.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://cjcuc.com/site/2015/12/03/orthodox-rabbinic-statement-on-christianity/|title=Orthodox Rabbinic Statement on Christianity – To Do the Will of Our Father in Heaven – Toward a Partnership between Jews and Christians|website=CJCUC|date=3 December 2015|access-date=29 October 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161016174221/http://cjcuc.com/site/2015/12/03/orthodox-rabbinic-statement-on-christianity/|archive-date=16 October 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref>
 
Line 381 ⟶ 383:
 
==See also==
{{Columns-list|colwidth=30em|
* [[Anabaptist–Jewish relations]]
* [[Anti-Judaism]]
* [[Antisemitism in Christianity]]
* [[Anti-Zionism]]
* [[Biblical criticism]]
* [[Christian fundamentalism]]
* [[Christianity and other religions]]
* [[Christianity and violence]]
** [[History of Christian thought on persecution and tolerance]]
* [[Christianity in Israel]]
* [[Christian–Jewish reconciliation]]
* [[Christian Zionism]]
* [[Commonwealth Theology]]
* [[Criticism of the Bible]]
* [[Criticism of Christianity]]
* [[Criticism of Israel]]
* [[Criticism of Jesus]]
* [[Criticism of Judaism]]
* [[Criticism of monotheism]]
* [[Criticism of religion]]
* [[Groups claiming affiliation with Israelites]]
** [[Black Hebrew Israelites]]
** [[British Israelism]]
** [[Christian Identity]]
** [[Kinism]]
** [[Nordic Israelism]]
* [[Hebrew Roots]]
* [[History of Christianity]]
** [[Role of Christianity in civilization]]
* [[History of ancient Israel and Judah]]
* [[History of Israel]]
* [[History of the Jews and Judaism in the Land of Israel]]
* [[History of Zionism]]
* [[Jesus in Christianity]]
* [[Jewish fundamentalism]]
* [[Jewish history]]
* [[Jewish religious movements]]
* [[Jewish schisms]]
* [[Jewish views on religious pluralism]]
* [[Judaism and violence]]
* [[Judaism's view of Jesus]]
* [[Judaizers]]
* [[Noahidism]]
* [[Philosemitism]]
* [[Relations between Eastern Orthodoxy and Judaism|Orthodox Christianity and Judaism]]
* [[Catholic Church and Judaism|Roman Catholicism and Judaism]]
** [[Hebrew Catholics]]
** [[Nostra aetate]]
** [[Pope John Paul II and Judaism]]
* [[Judaism and Mormonism]]
** [[House of Joseph (LDS Church)]]
* [[Messianic Judaism]]
* [[Noahidism]]
* [[Protestantism and Judaism]]
* [[Religious antisemitism]]
* [[Sacred Name Movement]]
* [[Seventh-day Adventist Interfaith Relations]]
* [[Supersessionism]]
* [[Two House theology]]
* [[Jewish Christian#Split of early Christianity and Judaism|Split of Christianity and Judaism]]
}}
 
==Notes==