Concentrated poverty: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Ddegenhart (talk | contribs)
finished revision of causes and effects sections
Ddegenhart (talk | contribs)
Line 137:
====Mobility programs====
 
Authorized in 1992, the [[Moving to Opportunity|Moving To Opportunity]] (MTO) pilot program provided [[Section 8 (housing)|section 8]] vouchers to public housing residents to enable them to move out of public housing and into neighborhoods with lower poverty. Modeled after Chicago's [[Gautreaux Project|Gautreaux program]], which provided housing vouchers to black public housing residents so they could move to more integrated neighborhoods, MTO stands as an examleexample of "mobility programs" aimed at enabling poor families from high-poverty neighborhoods to move into communities featuring decreased poverty levels, such as middle-class neighborhoods.
 
Comparatively, the Gatreuax program exhibited stronger and clearer results than MTO. The program assigned participants selected from the same pool of callers to random private apartment placements in either suburban or urban locations. Follow-ups several years later revealed different outcomes between suburban and urban participants. Namely, urban participants were more likely to have remained on welfare rolls while their suburban counterparts were very likely to find employment and leave welfare programs. Additionally, children of urban participants were likely to drop out of high school while suburban participants were likely to graduate from high school and proceed towards college. The children of both types of participants began below the average academic level of their peers, however due to the lower number of participants selected for suburbs, suburban participants' children experience greater individual instruction. In turn, suburban children eventually reached the same level of academic proficiency as their average classmates.