Content deleted Content added
Bluealbion (talk | contribs) m wikisource in infobox |
No edit summary |
||
Line 27:
}}
{{Politics of Norway}}
The '''Constitution of Norway''' (complete name: '''The Constitution of the Kingdom of Norway'''; [[Danish language|Danish]]: {{lang|da|Kongeriget Norges Grundlov}};<ref>Lovdata.no: [http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-18140517-000.html LOV 1814-05-17 nr 00: Kongeriget Norges Grundlov]</ref> [[Norwegian language|Norwegian]] [[Bokmål]]: {{lang|nb|Kongeriket Norges Grunnlov}};
It was considered one of the world's most liberal and democratic constitutions
==History==
Line 38:
===Writing the constitution===
Until 1814, Norway was part of the Kingdom of [[Denmark-Norway]]. Following the defeat of [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon's]] troops at the [[Battle of Leipzig]] in October 1813, the [[Treaty of Kiel]] of January 1814 ceded Norway to Sweden. In response, the Crown Prince of Denmark-Norway and resident viceroy in Norway, [[Christian Frederik]]
The Norwegian constitution was inspired by the [[United States Declaration of Independence]] in 1776 and the [[French revolution]] in 1789, and the subsequent U.S. and French constitutions. The authors, [[Christian Magnus Falsen]] and [[Johan Gunder Adler]], were also influenced by the [[Spanish Constitution of 1812]]. A deviation from the republican constitutions of France and the USA was the retention of [[monarchy]]. Importing republicanism was seen as an attempt to emulate the French and Americans directly, something the lawmakers at Eidsvoll sought to avoid. The choice of monarchy as state form would also facilitate the reunification of Denmark-Norway, something the Crown Prince was not alone in seeking. The king's power was however severely curtailed. His absolute veto over laws was removed.{{Citation needed|date=February 2021}} The council of Eidsvoll chose, not surprisingly, Crown Prince Christian Frederik as [[Monarchy of Norway|king]]. He was thus ''chosen'', and as such a king by the will of the people rather than by the grace of God. In a Europe where almost all countries were ruled by [[absolute monarchy]], this was seen as extremely radical. [[Christian Adolph Diriks]], who was the legal secretary of the [[Standing Committee on Scrutiny and Constitutional Affairs|Constitutional Committee]], was the assembly's resident expert on foreign constitutions, and played an important part in shaping the language of the constitution. Diriks is credited with formulating §100, concerning [[freedom of speech]], and §102, guarding against unreasonable [[Search and seizure|searches and seizures]].<ref name=nbl>{{cite encyclopedia|title=Christian Adolph Diriks|encyclopedia=[[Norsk biografisk leksikon]]|first=Terje|last=Bratberg|editor=[[Knut Helle|Helle, Knut]]|publisher=Kunnskapsforlaget|location=Oslo|url=http://www.snl.no/.nbl_biografi/Christian_Adolph_Diriks/utdypning|language=no|access-date=2010-05-28}}</ref>
The constitution shows a curious mix of radical and traditional values. The principle of [[separation of powers]] between the executive, legislative and judicial branches was directly inspired by radical ideas from the US and French systems. The retention of a king, a [[Church of Norway|constitutional church]], defined as Evangelical-Lutheran, and the banning of Jesuits, monkish orders, and Jews, which latter were not allowed to travel to Norway, in the face of [[Republicanism]] was a traditionalist move; however, the king's power was severely curtailed, and the church very much under the control of the elected body. Suffrage was extended, but was still restricted to certain groups of men. All men who were either farmers possessing their own land, civil servants, or urban property owners could vote. With this, about half of all Norwegian men were granted the right to vote.
|