European Parliament: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
(19 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{short description|Directly elected legislature of the European Union}}
{{for-multi|the body of the Council of Europe|Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe|the upcominglast elections|2024 European Parliament election}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2016}}
{{Infobox legislature
Line 33:
| legislature = [[Ninth European Parliament|9th European Parliament]]
| logo_pic = European Parliament logo.svg
| house_type = [[European Union legislative procedure|''De facto'' lower house<br />of bicameral legislature]]
| jurisdiction = <!-- [[European Union]] -->
| term_limits = No
Line 41:
| leader1 = [[Roberta Metsola]]
| party1 = [[European People's Party Group|EPP]]
| election1 = 18 January 2022
| leader2_type = [[Vice President of the European Parliament|Vice-Presidents]]
'''First Vice-President:'''<br />[[Othmar Karas]], EPP<br />
'''other Vice-Presidents:''' ''[[Vice-President of the European Parliament#9th Parliament|See List]]''<br />since 18 January 2022
| leader3_type = {{nobr|[[Secretariat of the European Parliament#Secretary-General|Secretary-General]]}}&nbsp;
| leader3 = [[Alessandro Chiocchetti]]
Line 51:
| structure1 = Parlamento Europeo 2024.svg
| structure1_res = 250px
| political_groups1 =
''Outgoing European Parliament''
:{{Color box|{{party color|European People's Party Group}}|border=silver}} [[European People's Party Group|EPP]] (176){{efn|
* {{Color box|{{party color|European People's Party}}|border=silver}} [[European People's Party|EPP]] (168)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Non-Inscrits}}|border=silver}} Unaffiliated (4)
* {{Color box|{{party color|European Christian Political Movement}}|border=silver}} [[European Christian Political Movement|ECPM]] (2)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Independent politician}}|border=silver}} [[Independent politician|Ind.]] (2)
}}
:{{Color box|{{party color|Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats}}|border=silver}} [[Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats|S&D]] (139){{efn|
* {{Color box|{{party color|Party of European Socialists}}|border=silver}} [[Party of European Socialists|PES]] (127)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Non-Inscrits}}|border=silver}} Unaffiliated (8)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Independent politician}}|border=silver}} [[Independent politician|Ind.]] (4)
}}
:{{Color box|{{party color|Renew Europe}}|border=silver}} [[Renew Europe|Renew]] (102){{efn|
* {{Color box|{{party color|Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party}}|border=silver}} [[Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party|ALDE]] (60)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Non-Inscrits}}|border=silver}} Unaffiliated (25)
* {{Color box|{{party color|European Democratic Party}}|border=silver}} [[European Democratic Party|EDP]] (10)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Independent politician}}|border=silver}} [[Independent politician|Ind.]] (6)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Volt Europa}}|border=silver}} [[Volt Europa|Volt]] (1)
}}
:{{Color box|{{party color|Greens–European Free Alliance}}|border=silver}} [[Greens–European Free Alliance|Greens/EFA]] (72){{efn|
* {{Color box|{{party color|European Green Party}}|border=silver}} [[European Green Party|EGP]] (51)
* {{Color box|{{party color|European Free Alliance}}|border=silver}} [[European Free Alliance|EFA]] (7)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Independent politician}}|border=silver}} [[Independent politician|Ind.]] (6)
* {{Color box|{{party color|European Pirate Party}}|border=silver}} [[European Pirate Party|PPEU]] (4)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Non-Inscrits}}|border=silver}} Unaffiliated (3)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Volt Europa}}|border=silver}} [[Volt Europa|Volt]] (1)
}}
:{{Color box|{{party color|European Conservatives and Reformists}}|border=silver}} [[European Conservatives and Reformists|ECR]] (69){{efn|
* {{Color box|{{party color|European Conservatives and Reformists Party}}|border=silver}} [[European Conservatives and Reformists Party|ECR]] (53)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Non-Inscrits}}|border=silver}} Unaffiliated (11)
* {{Color box|{{party color|European Free Alliance}}|border=silver}} [[European Free Alliance|EFA]] (3)
* {{Color box|{{party color|European Christian Political Movement}}|border=silver}} [[European Christian Political Movement|ECPM]] (2)
}}
:{{Color box|{{party color|Identity and Democracy}}|border=silver}} [[Identity and Democracy|ID]] (49){{efn|
* {{Color box|{{party color|Identity and Democracy Party}}|border=silver}} [[Identity and Democracy Party|ID]] (48)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Non-Inscrits}}|border=silver}} Unaffiliated (1)
}}
:{{Color box|{{party color|The Left in the European Parliament – GUE/NGL}}|border=silver}} [[The Left in the European Parliament – GUE/NGL|The Left]] (37){{efn|
* {{Color box|{{party color|Party of the European Left}}|border=silver}} [[Party of the European Left|PEL]] (21)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Non-Inscrits}}|border=silver}} Unaffiliated (14)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Animal Politics EU}}|border=silver}} [[Animal Politics EU|APEU]] (1)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Independent politician}}|border=silver}} [[Independent politician|Ind.]] (1)
}}
:{{Color box|{{party color|Non-Inscrits}}|border=silver}} [[Non-Inscrits|NI]] (61){{efn|
* {{Color box|{{party color|Non-Inscrits}}|border=silver}} Unaffiliated (39)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Independent politician}}|border=silver}} [[Independent politician|Ind.]] (17)
* {{Color box|{{party color|Party of European Socialists}}|border=silver}} [[Party of European Socialists|PES]] (3)
* {{Color box|{{party color|European Christian Political Movement}}|border=silver}} [[European Christian Political Movement|ECPM]] (1)
* {{Color box|{{party color|European Free Alliance}}|border=silver}} [[European Free Alliance|EFA]] (1)
}}
| committees1 = {{Collapsible list|title = [[Committees of the European Parliament|22]]
Line 138 ⟶ 139:
| seats1_title =
| seats1 =
| voting_system1 = Chosen by member state.<br />Systems include:
* [[Party-list proportional representation|Party list PR]]
* [[Single transferable vote|STV]] in Ireland and Malta
* ''de facto'' [[FPTP|FPTP/SMP]]<br />(only in the [[German-speaking electoral college|German-speaking]]<br />[[German-speaking electoral college|electoral college]] in Belgium)
| first_election1 = [[1979 European Parliament election|7–10 June 1979]]
| last_election1 = [[20192024 European Parliament election|23–266–9 MayJune 20192024]]
| next_election1 = [[2024 European Parliament election|6–9 June 2024]]2029
| redistricting =
| motto = ''[[Motto of the European Union|In varietate concordia]]''<br />(United in diversity)
| session_room = European Parliament Strasbourg Hemicycle - Diliffhemicycle.jpg
| session_res = 300px
| session_alt = European parliament hemicycle in Strasbourg, France
Line 160 ⟶ 161:
}}
 
The '''European Parliament''' ('''EP''') is one of the three [[Legislature|legislative bodies]] of the [[European Union]] and one of its seven [[Institutions of the European Union|institutions]]. Together with the [[Council of the European Union]] (known as the Council and informally as the Council of Ministers), it adopts European legislation, following a proposal by the [[European Commission]]. The Parliament is composed of 705720 [[Member of the European Parliament|members]] (MEPs), due to rise to 720 after the June 2024 European elections, from a previous 705 MEPs. It represents the second-largest democratic electorate in the world (after the [[Parliament of India]]), with an electorate of around 375&nbsp;million eligible [[Voting|voters]] in 20092024.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/07/AR2009060702402.html |title=Conservatives Post Gains In European Elections |author1=Brand, Constant |author2=Wielaard, Robert |agency=Associated Press |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=8 June 2009 |access-date=17 August 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |author=Ian Traynor |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/jun/07/eu-elections-social-democrats |title=Misery for social democrats as voters take a turn to the right |work=The Guardian |location=UK |date=7 June 2009 |access-date=17 August 2010}}</ref><ref name="18 new MEPs take their seats">{{cite web |url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/content/20120103MUN34829/html/18-new-MEPs-take-their-seats |title=18 new MEPs take their seats |publisher=European Parliament |date=10 January 2012 |access-date=14 February 2012 |archive-date=11 May 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130511172955/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/content/20120103MUN34829/html/18-new-MEPs-take-their-seats |url-status=dead }}</ref>
 
Since 1979, the Parliament has been directly elected every five years by the [[Citizenship of the European Union|citizens of the European Union]] through [[universal suffrage]]. [[Voter turnout]] in parliamentary elections decreased each time after [[1979 European Parliament election|1979]] until [[2019 European Parliament election|2019]], when voter turnout increased by eight percentage points, and rose above 50% for the first time since [[1994 European Parliament election|1994]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Results of the 2014 European elections|url=http://www.results-elections2014.eu/en/turnout.html|publisher=European Parliament|access-date=7 August 2014|archive-date=3 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210203022915/https://www.europarl.europa.eu/elections2014-results/en/election-results-2014.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> The [[voting age]] is 18 in all [[Member state of the European Union|EU member states]] except for [[Malta]], [[Belgium]], [[Austria]] and [[Germany]], where it is 16, and [[Greece]], where it is 17.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Voting age for European elections {{!}} Think Tank |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_ATA(2023)749767 |access-date=2023-06-09 |website=European Parliament |language=en}}</ref>
 
The European Parliament has legislative power in that the adoption of EU legislation normally requires its approval, and that of the Council, in what amounts to a bicameral legislature. However, it does not formally possess the [[Right of initiative (legislative)|right of initiative]] (i.e. the right to formally initiate the legislative procedure) in the way that most [[National parliaments of the European Union|national parliaments]] of the member states do, as the right of initiative is a prerogative of the European Commission.<ref name="Parliament's powers"/><ref name="Pot initiative"/> Nonetheless, the Parliament and the Council each have the right to request the Commission to initiate the legislative procedure and put forward a proposal.<ref>Articles 225 and 241 of the [[Treaty on the Functioning of the EU]]</ref>
 
The Parliament is, in protocol terms, the "first institution" of the European Union (mentioned first in [[Treaties of the European Union|its treaties]] and having ceremonial precedence over the other EU institutions),<ref name="Protocol"/> and shares equal legislative and [[Budget of the European Union|budgetary powers]] with the Council (except on a few issues where [[Legislature of the European Union#Special legislative procedures|special legislative procedures]] apply). It likewise has equal control over the [[Budget of the European Union|EU budget]]. Ultimately, the European Commission, which serves as the executive branch of the EU, is accountable to Parliament. In particular, Parliament can decide whether or not to approve the European Council's nominee for [[President of the European Commission|President of the Commission]], and is further tasked with approving (or rejecting) the appointment of the Commission as a whole. It can subsequently force the current Commission to resign by adopting a [[motion of censure]].<ref name="Parliament's powers"/>
 
The [[president of the European Parliament]] is the body's [[Speaker (politics)|speaker]] and presides over the multi-party chamber. The five largest political groups are the [[European People's Party Group]] (EPP), the [[Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats]] (S&D), [[Renew Europe]] (previously [[Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe group|ALDE]]), the [[Greens–European Free Alliance|Greens/European Free Alliance]] (Greens/EFA) and [[Identity and Democracy]] (ID). The last EU-wide election was [[20192024 European Parliament election|held in 20192024]].
 
The Parliament's headquarters are officially in [[Strasbourg]], France,<ref name="treaty">[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012M%2FTXT Article 28] of the [[Treaty on European Union]]</ref> and has [[Secretariat of the European Parliament|its administrative offices]] in [[Luxembourg City]]. [[Plenary session]]s are "normally held in Strasbourg for four days a month, but sometimes there are additional sessions in Brussels",<ref name="about-eu">{{cite web|url=http://europa.eu/about-eu/institutions-bodies/european-parliament/index_en.htm |title=European Parliament |publisher=Europa |date=19 April 2010 |access-date=2012-12-08}}</ref> while the Parliament's committee meetings are held primarily in Brussels, Belgium.<ref name="about-eu"/><ref name="Consolidated Treaty">{{cite web|title=Consolidated versions of the treaty on European Union and of the treaty establishing the European Community|publisher=[[Europa (web portal)|Eur-lex]]|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/ce321/ce32120061229en00010331.pdf|access-date=12 June 2007|archive-date=1 December 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071201005900/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/ce321/ce32120061229en00010331.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> In practice, the Parliament works three weeks per month in Brussels and one week (four days) in Strasbourg.
Line 201 ⟶ 202:
Like the other institutions, the Parliament's [[Seat (legal entity)|seat]] was not yet fixed. The provisional arrangements placed Parliament in [[Strasbourg]], while the Commission and Council had their seats in Brussels. In 1985 the Parliament, wishing to be closer to these institutions, built a second chamber in Brussels and moved some of its work there despite protests from some states. A final agreement was eventually reached by the [[European Council]] in 1992. It stated the Parliament would retain its formal seat in Strasbourg, where twelve sessions a year would be held, but with all other parliamentary activity in Brussels. This two-seat arrangement was contested by the Parliament, but was later enshrined in the [[Treaty of Amsterdam]]. To this day the [[Location of European Union institutions|institution's locations]] are a source of contention.<ref name="ENA seats">{{cite web|title=The seats of the institutions of the European Union|url=http://www.cvce.eu/obj/the_seats_of_the_institutions_of_the_european_union-en-cd672879-aeb1-4cad-a0c1-9e4ff75ff660.html|publisher=CVCE|access-date=19 April 2013}}</ref>
 
The Parliament gained more powers from successive revisions of the EU treaties, notably through the extension of the [[ordinary legislative procedure]] (originally called the codecision procedure),<ref name="ENA legis">{{cite web|title=Power to legislate of the European Parliament|url=http://www.cvce.eu/obj/power_to_legislate_of_the_european_parliament-en-4f35fdb4-323e-49a0-a138-5b11d701d9a3.html|publisher=[[Centre virtuel de la connaissance sur l'Europe|CVCE]]|access-date=19 April 2013}}</ref> and the right to approve international agreements through the consent procedure.
 
In 1999, the Parliament forced the resignation of the [[Santer Commission]].<ref>{{cite web |last=Topan |first=Angelina |title=The resignation of the Santer-Commission: the impact of 'trust' and 'reputation' |date=30 September 2002|publisher=European Integration Online Papers|url=http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2002-014.pdf|access-date=19 April 2013}}</ref> The Parliament had refused to approve the [[Budget of the European Union|Community budget]] over allegations of fraud and mis-management in the commission. The two main parties took on a government-opposition dynamic for the first time during the crisis which ended in the Commission resigning en masse, the first of any forced resignation, in the face of an impending censure from the Parliament.<ref name="Ringe"/>
Line 222 ⟶ 223:
}}
 
In 2007, for the first time, Justice Commissioner [[Franco Frattini]] included Parliament in talks on the second [[Schengen Information System]] even though, in this field at the time, MEPs only needed to be consulted on parts of the package. After that experiment, Frattini indicated he would like to include Parliament in all justice and criminal matters, informally pre-empting the new powers they were due to gain in 2009 as part of the [[Treaty of Lisbon]].<ref name="Frattini 2009">{{cite web |last=Beunderman |first=Mark |title=Frattini seeks to apply new EU treaty rules before 2009 |publisher=EU Observer |date=9 November 2007 |url=http://euobserver.com/9/25117 |access-date=9 November 2007 }}</ref>
 
===Recent history===
Line 229 ⟶ 230:
Between 2007 and 2009, a [[special working group on parliamentary reform]] implemented a series of changes to modernise the institution such as more speaking time for rapporteurs, increased committee co-operation and other efficiency reforms.<ref name="REFO12">{{cite web|title=Parliamentary reform put into practice|publisher=European Parliament|date=17 January 2008|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=IM-PRESS&reference=20080116BKG18998&language=EN|access-date=3 February 2009 }}</ref><ref name="REFO3">{{cite web|title=Parliamentary reform: third package adopted|publisher=European Parliament|date=20 March 2009|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+IM-PRESS+20090320IPR52228+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN|access-date=3 February 2009 }}</ref>
 
The Lisbon Treaty came into force on 1 December 2009, granting Parliament powers over the entire [[Budget of the European Union|EU budget]], making Parliament's [[Ordinary legislative procedure|legislative powers]] equal to the Council's in nearly all areas and describing Parliament's vote on an incoming [[President of the European Commission|Commission President]] Commission President as an "election", with the European Council having to make its proposal to Parliament in light of the results of the European elections.<ref name="Constitution info"/>
 
Barroso gained the support of the European Council for a second term and secured majority support from the Parliament in September 2009. Parliament voted 382 votes in favour and 219 votes against (117 abstentions) with support of the [[European People's Party]], [[European Conservatives and Reformists]] and the [[Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe]].<ref name="B2V">{{cite web|title=MEPs elect Barroso to a second term as Commission President |publisher=European Parliament |date=16 September 2009 |url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/infopress_page/008-60584-257-09-38-901-20090911IPR60583-14-09-2009-2009-false/default_en.htm |access-date=28 June 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090923032006/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/infopress_page/008-60584-257-09-38-901-20090911IPR60583-14-09-2009-2009-false/default_en.htm|archive-date=23 September 2009|df=dmy-all}}</ref> The liberals gave support after Barroso gave them a number of concessions; the liberals previously joined the socialists' call for a delayed vote (the EPP had wanted to approve Barroso in July of that year).<ref name="B2C">{{cite web |last=Taylor |first=Simon |title=A second term&nbsp;– but at what price? |publisher=[[European Voice]] |date=17 September 2009 |url=http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/a-second-term-–-but-at-what-price-/65887.aspx |access-date=28 June 2007 }}</ref>
Line 236 ⟶ 237:
 
Before the final vote on the Commission, Parliament demanded a number of concessions as part of a future working agreement under the new Lisbon Treaty. The deal includes that Parliament's president will attend high level Commission meetings. Parliament will have an observer seat in the EU's Commission-led international negotiations and have a right to information on agreements. Parliament did not secure an explicit vote over the appointment of [[List of diplomatic missions of the European Union|delegation]] heads and [[European Union Special Representative|special representatives]] for foreign policy, but it was agreed that they will appear before parliament after they have been appointed by the [[High Representative]]. Parliament wanted a pledge from the Commission that it would automatically put forward legislation when parliament requests. Barroso considered this an infringement on the Commission's powers but did agree to respond within three months. Most requests are already responded to positively.<ref name="B2A">{{cite web|last=Taylor|first=Simon|title=MEPs agree working relations with Barroso|publisher=[[European Voice]]|date=28 January 2010|url=http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/meps-agree-working-relations-with-barroso/66982.aspx|access-date=28 June 2007 }}</ref>
 
[[File:MEPs condemn Hamas attack on Israel and call for a humanitarian pause - 53271623613.jpg|thumb|Moment of silence for victims of Hamas' terrorist attack on Israel, October 2023]]
 
During the setting up of the [[European External Action Service]] (EEAS), Parliament used its control over the EU budget to influence the shape of the EEAS. MEPs had aimed at getting greater oversight over the EEAS by linking it to the Commission and having political deputies to the [[High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy|High Representative]]. MEPs did not manage to get everything they demanded. However, they got broader financial control over the new body.<ref name="EEAS"/><ref>{{cite web|last=Vogel|first=Toby|title=Backing of MEPs paves way for launch of diplomatic corps|publisher=EurActiv|date=21 October 2010|url=http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/backing-of-meps-paves-way-for-launch-of-diplomatic-corps/69215.aspx|access-date=19 September 2011 }}</ref>
Line 241 ⟶ 244:
In December 2017, [[Politico]] denounced the insufficient racial diversity among Members of the European Parliament.<ref>{{cite news |last=Heath |first=Ryan |title=Brussels is blind to diversity |newspaper=Politico |date=11 December 2017 |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/brussels-blind-to-diversity-whiteout-european-parliament/ |access-date=7 May 2021}}</ref> The subsequent news coverage contributed to create the Brussels So White movement to campaign to rectify this situation.<ref>{{cite news |last=Chander |first=Sarah |title=Why is Brussels so white? The EU's race problem that no one talks about |newspaper=The Guardian |date=19 May 2019 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/19/eu-race-problem-european-elections-meps-migrants-minorities |access-date=7 May 2021}}</ref>
 
On gender balance, some 37 percent of MEPs were women in the 2014-19 Parliament and 40 percent in the 2019-24 Parliament, a greater propostionproposition than in most national Parliaments in Member States <ref>Corbett, Richard; Jacobs, Francis; Shackleton, Michael (2016). The European Parliament (9th ed.). London: John Harper Publishing. ISBN 978-0-9564508-5-2. The same three co-authors have written every edition since the first in 1990.</ref> In January 2019, MEPs supported proposals to boost opportunities for women and tackle sexual harassment in the European Parliament.<ref>{{cite news|title=MEPs follow UK's lead to promote gender equality|url=http://conservativeeurope.com/news/gender-equality|work=Conservative Europe|date=15 January 2019|access-date=29 January 2019|archive-date=23 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190323130356/http://conservativeeurope.com/news/gender-equality|url-status=dead}}</ref>
 
In 2022, four people were arrested because of corruption. This came to be known as the [[Qatar corruption scandal at the European Parliament]].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-63941509 |title=EU corruption scandal puts democracy under attack - European Parliament head |publisher=BBC News |date=12 December 2022 }}</ref>
 
In October 2023, the Parliament adopted a resolution to condemn "Hamas' despicable terrorist attacks against Israel".<ref>{{cite web | title = MEPs condemn Hamas attack on Israel and call for a humanitarian pause | publisher = European Parliament | date = October 19, 2023 | url = https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20231013IPR07136/meps-condemn-hamas-attack-on-israel-and-call-for-a-humanitarian-pause}}</ref>
 
==Powers and functions==
Line 257 ⟶ 263:
* {{cite book |last=Corbett |first=Richard |author-link=Richard Corbett |title=The European Parliament's Role in Closer EU Integration |publisher=[[Palgrave Macmillan]] |date=June 1998 |location=LBasingstoke |isbn=978-0333722527 }}</ref> These negotiations take place in so-called "trilogue" meetings, in which the Commission is also present.
 
In a few areas, ''special legislative procedures'' apply. These include justice and home affairs, budget and taxation, and certain aspects of other policy areas, such as the fiscal aspects of environmental policy. In these areas, the Council or Parliament decide law alone after consulting the other (or with its consent).<ref name="lisbon explain"/>
 
There are different types of [[European Union law#Legislation]].<ref name="Parliament's powers"/> The strongest act is a [[Regulation (European Union)|regulation]], an [[Act of Parliament|act]] or [[Statutory law|law]] which is directly applicable in its entirety. Then there are [[Directive (European Union)|directives]] which bind member states to certain goals which they must achieve. They do this through their own laws and hence have room to manoeuvre in deciding upon them. A [[European Union decision|decision]] is an instrument which is applicable to a particular person or group. Institutions may also issue [[European Union recommendation|recommendations and opinions]] which are merely non-binding, declarations.<ref>{{cite web|title=Community legal instruments |publisher=European Parliament |url=http://europa.eu/scadplus/glossary/community_legal_instruments_en.htm |access-date=18 September 2007 |url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070708114002/http://europa.eu/scadplus/glossary/community_legal_instruments_en.htm |archive-date=8 July 2007 |df=dmy }}</ref>
 
===Budget===
Line 271 ⟶ 277:
In practice, the Parliament has never voted against a President or his Commission, but the threat to do so has produced concessions to Parliament on the Commission's composition or on policy commitments. As described above, when the Barroso Commission was put forward, the Parliament forced the proposal to be withdrawn and changed to be more acceptable to Parliament.<ref name="IHT Butt">{{cite web|last=Bowley|first=Graham|title=Buttiglione affair highlights evolving role of Parliament : Questions arise on democracy at the EU|work=International Herald Tribune|date=18 October 2004|url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2004/10/18/brussels_ed3_.php|access-date=1 July 2007|archive-date=10 February 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090210125124/http://www.iht.com/articles/2004/10/18/brussels_ed3_.php|url-status=dead}}</ref> That pressure was seen as an important sign by some of the evolving nature of the Parliament and its ability to make the Commission accountable, rather than being a rubber stamp for candidates. Furthermore, in voting on the Commission, MEPs also vote along party lines, rather than national lines, despite frequent pressure from national governments on their MEPs. This cohesion and willingness to use the Parliament's power ensured greater attention from national leaders, other institutions and the public{{snd}} reversing the previous decline in turnout for the Parliament's elections.<ref>{{cite web |last=Murray |first=Alasdair |title=Three cheers for EU democracy |publisher=[[Open Europe]] |year=2004 |url=http://www.cer.org.uk/articles/39_murray.html |access-date=7 July 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070610003606/http://www.cer.org.uk/articles/39_murray.html |archive-date=10 June 2007 |url-status=dead|df=dmy }}</ref>
 
The Parliament also has the power to censure the Commission by a two-thirds majority which will force the resignation of the entire Commission from office. As with approval, this power has never been explicitly used, but when faced with such a vote, the [[Santer Commission]] then [[Santer Commission#Resignation|resigned of their own accord]].
 
There are other control instruments, such as: the requirement of Commission to submit reports to the Parliament and answer written and oral questions from MEPs; the requirement of the President-in-office of the Council to present its programme at the start of their [[Presidency of the Council of the European Union|presidency]]; the obligation on the President of the [[European Council]] to report to Parliament after each of its meetings; the right of MEPs to make requests for legislation and policy to the Commission; and the right to question members of those institutions (e.g. "Commission [[Question Time]]" every Tuesday).<ref name="Commission Appointment"/><ref name="Commission Oversight"/> Regarding written and oral questions, MEPs voted in July 2008 MEPs to limit questions to those within the EU's mandate and ban offensive or personal questions.<ref name="EUO rise">{{cite web|last=Mahony|first=Honor|title=New rules to make it harder for MEPs to form political groups|url=http://euobserver.com/9/26468|date=9 July 2008|work=International Herald Tribune |access-date=10 July 2008}}</ref>
Line 278 ⟶ 284:
The Parliament also has other powers of general supervision, mainly granted by the [[Maastricht Treaty]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Maastricht Treaty 15 years on: birth of the "European Union"|publisher=European Parliament|date=7 February 2007|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/public/story_page/008-2784-036-02-06-901-20070206STO02783-2007-05-02-2007/default_en.htm|access-date=6 July 2007|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070209191039/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/public/story_page/008-2784-036-02-06-901-20070206STO02783-2007-05-02-2007/default_en.htm|archive-date=9 February 2007|df=dmy-all}}</ref> The Parliament has the power to set up a Committee of Inquiry, for example over mad cow disease or CIA detention flights{{snd}} the former led to the creation of the [[European Medicines Agency|European veterinary agency]]. The Parliament can call other institutions to answer questions and if necessary to take them to [[Court of Justice of the European Communities|court]] if they break EU law or treaties.<ref name="supervisory">{{cite web|title=Supervisory power|publisher=European Parliament|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/parliament/public/staticDisplay.do?id=46&pageRank=8&language=EN|access-date=12 June 2007 }}</ref> Furthermore, it has powers over the appointment of the members of the Court of Auditors<ref>{{cite web|title=Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament. Rule 101: Appointment of the Members of the Court of Auditors|publisher=European Parliament|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+RULES-EP+20070101+RULE-101+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN&navigationBar=YES|access-date=7 July 2007}}</ref> and the president and executive board of the [[European Central Bank]]. The [[List of Presidents of the European Central Bank|ECB president]] is also obliged to present an annual report to the parliament.<ref name="supervisory"/>
 
The [[European Ombudsman]] is elected by the Parliament to deal with public complaints about maladministration (administrative irregularities, unfairness, discrimination, abuse of power, failure to reply, refusal of information or unnecessary delay) by any EU institution or body.<ref name="supervisory"/>
 
Petitions can be brought to the Parliament by any EU citizen on a matter within the EU's sphere of activities. The Parliament's [[Committee on Petitions]] hears cases, some 1500 each year, sometimes presented by the citizen themselves at the Parliament. While the Parliament attempts to resolve the issue as a mediator they do resort to legal proceedings if it is necessary to resolve the citizens dispute.<ref name="petitions">{{cite news|last=Rickards|first=Mark|title=MEPs get taste of people power|publisher=BBC News|date=3 November 2007|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7075573.stm|access-date=3 November 2007 }}</ref>
Line 286 ⟶ 292:
{{Main|Members of the European Parliament}}
 
The [[Member of Parliament|parliamentarians]] are known in English as [[Members of the European Parliament]] (MEPs). They are elected every five years by [[universal suffrage|universal adult suffrage]] and sit according to political allegiance. About 40 percent are women. Before the [[1979 European Parliament election|first direct elections, in 1979]], they were appointed by their national parliaments.<ref name="ENA composition"/><ref name="EP Members">{{cite web|title=Members|publisher=European Parliament|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/parliament/public/staticDisplay.do?id=45&pageRank=3 |access-date=27 October 2007}}</ref>
 
The Parliament has been criticized for underrepresentation of minority groups. In 2017, an estimated 17 MEPs were non-white,<ref>{{cite web|first=Ginger |last=Hervey |title=When Britain exits the EU, its diversity departs too |publisher=politico.eu |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/brexit-diversity-exits-the-eu-brussels/amp/ |date=12 November 2017 |access-date=24 October 2018}}</ref> and of these, three were black, a disproportionately low number.<ref>{{cite news|title=The EU is too white – and Brexit likely to make it worse, MEPs and staff say |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/29/eu-is-too-white-brexit-likely-to-make-it-worse |newspaper=The Guardian |date=29 August 2018 |first=Jennifer |last=Rankin |access-date=24 October 2018}}</ref> According to activist organization [[European Network Against Racism]], while an estimated 10% of Europe is composed of racial and ethnic minorities, only 5% of MEPs were members of such groups following the [[2019 European Parliament election]].<ref name="Psaledakis2020">{{cite news |last1=Psaledakis |first1=Daphne |title=Minorities still lack a strong voice in new European Parliament |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-jobs-minorities/minorities-still-lack-a-strong-voice-in-new-european-parliament-idUSKCN1TD28X |access-date=25 October 2020 |work=Reuters |date=12 June 2019}}</ref>
 
Under the [[Treaty of Lisbon|Lisbon Treaty]], [[Apportionment in the European Parliament|seats are allocated]] to each state according to population and the maximum number of members is set at 751.<ref name="EUO Lisbon">{{cite web|last=Goldirova|first=Renata|title=EU agrees new 'Treaty of Lisbon'|date=19 October 2007|publisher=EU Observer|url=http://euobserver.com/9/25001|access-date=19 November 2007}}</ref> Since 1 February 2020 and the United Kingdom's [[Brexit|leaving the EU]], [https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/faq/12/how-many-meps 705 MEPs] sit in the European Parliament. It will riserose to 720 after the 2024 elections.
 
Representation is currently limited to a maximum of 96 seats and a minimum of 6 seats per state and the seats are distributed according to "[[degressive proportionality]]", i.e., the larger the state, the more citizens are represented per MEP. As a result, Maltese and Luxembourgish voters have roughly 10x more influence per voter than citizens of the six largest countries.
Line 314 ⟶ 320:
 
===Coalitions===
Given that the Parliament does not form the government in the traditional sense of many parliamentary systems, majorities are built issue by issue. Generally, this is along broadly [[consensus democracy|consensual]] lines with dynamic coalitions<ref>[http://aei.pitt.edu/97364/1/wp75_marie.pdf European Parliament: Is the grand coalition really a thing of the past?, Awenig Marié, 2019]</ref> rather than [[majority rule]] of competing parties and coalitions.
 
These coalitions are usually involve the [[European People's Party]] and the Socialist and Democrat Group of the [[Party of European Socialists]] who tend to co-operate to find compromises between them and then bring in others. Their relationship has been described as a [[grand coalition]].<ref>{{cite web|last=Settembri |first=Pierpaolo |title=Is the European Parliament competitive or consensual&nbsp;... "and why bother"? |url=http://www.fedtrust.co.uk/admin/uploads/FedT_workshop_Settembri.pdf |publisher=Federal Trust |date=2 February 2007 |access-date=7 October 2007 |url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071026181653/http://www.fedtrust.co.uk/admin/uploads/FedT_workshop_Settembri.pdf |archive-date=26 October 2007 |df=dmy }}</ref> However, this does not always produce agreement, and each may instead try to build other alliances, the EPP normally with other centre-right or right wing Groups and the PES with centre-left or left wing groups. Sometimes, the Liberal (Renew Europe) Group is then in the pivotal position.
 
There are also occasions where very sharp party political divisions have emerged, for example over the [[Santer Commission#Budget controversy|resignation of the Santer Commission]].<ref name="Ringe"/> When the initial allegations against the Commission emerged, they were directed primarily against [[Édith Cresson]] and [[Manuel Marín]], both socialist members. When the parliament was considering refusing to discharge the [[Budget of the European Union|Community budget]], President [[Jacques Santer]] stated that a no vote would be tantamount to a [[vote of no confidence]]. The Socialist Group initially supported the Commission and saw the issue as an attempt by the EPP to discredit their party ahead of the 1999 elections. Socialist leader, [[Pauline Green]] MEP, attempted a vote of confidence and the EPP put forward counter motions. During this period the two parties took on similar roles to a government-[[Opposition (parliamentary)|opposition]] dynamic, with the Socialists supporting the executive and EPP renouncing its previous coalition support and voting it down.<ref name="Ringe"/> Politicisation such as this has been increasing, in 2007 Simon Hix of the [[London School of Economics]] noted that:<ref name="Farrell Powerful"/>
Line 327 ⟶ 333:
{{EP election results graph (percentage)}}
 
Elections have taken place, directly in every member state, every five years since 1979. {{As of|2019}} there have been nine elections. When a nation joins mid-term, a by-election will be held to elect their representatives. This has happened six times, most recently when Croatia joined in 2013. Elections take place on over a four -day period from a Thursday to a Sunday (each Member State votes on the day of its choice). Member States choose their electoral system within common guidlinesguidelines, notably that the suffrage must be universal and that seats are allocated by [[Proportional representation|proportional]]. This includes determining constituencies: while most Member States have a national constituencies, some divide their allocation between regions. Seats are [[Apportionment in the European Parliament|allocated to member states]] according to their population, since 2014 with no state having more than 96, but no fewer than 6, to maintain proportionality.<ref>{{cite web|title=The European Parliament: electoral procedures |publisher=European Parliament |url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/facts/1_3_4_en.htm |access-date=12 June 2007 |url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070617144910/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/facts/1_3_4_en.htm |archive-date=17 June 2007 }}</ref>
 
The most recent Union-wide elections to the European Parliament were the [[2019 European Parliament election|European elections of 2019]], held from 23 to 26 May 2019. They were the largest simultaneous transnational elections ever held anywhere in the world.
Line 333 ⟶ 339:
[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20190627IPR55404/constitution-of-the-9th-legislature-of-the-european-parliament "Constitution of the 9th legislature of the European Parliament |News |European Parliament"]. European Parliament. 7 February 2019. Retrieved 17 September 2019.</ref>
 
[[European political parties]] have the exclusive right to campaign during the European elections (as opposed to their corresponding EP groups).<ref>{{cite web |title=European political parties |url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/contracts-and-grants/en/20150201PVL00101/Political-parties-and-foundations |access-date=2022-10-18 |website=europarl.europa.eu |publisher=European Parliament}}</ref> There have been a number of proposals designed to attract greater public attention to the elections. One such innovation in the 2014 elections was that the [[European political party|pan-European political parties]] announced, ahead of the elections, their candidates for [[President of the European Commission|president]] of the [[European Commission|Commission]], the so-called ''Spitzenkandidaten'' (German, "leading candidates" or "top candidates"). The President of the European Commission is nominated by the European Council, representing the governments of the member states, and while there is no obligation for them to nominate the successful "candidate", the Lisbon Treaty states that they should take account of the results of the elections when choosing whom to nominate, and the candidate they propose must be endorsed by a majority of members of the European Parliament.<ref>[[Richard Corbett]] 'The European Parliament and the Spitzenkandidaten Process', in Matilde Ceron, Thomas Christiansen, Dionyssis G. Dimitrakopoulos (eds) 'The Politicisation of the European Commission’sCommission's Presidency: Spitzenkandidaten and Beyond' ISBN 978-3-031-48172-7 (print) and ISBN 978-3-031-48173-4 (eBook)</ref>
 
The ''Spitzenkandidaten'' in 2014 were [[Jean-Claude Juncker]] for the [[European People's Party]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://juncker.epp.eu|title=Jean-Claude Juncker: Experience. Solidarity. Future.|publisher=European People's Party|access-date=20 July 2021|archive-date=17 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201117130239/http://juncker.epp.eu/|url-status=dead}}</ref> [[Martin Schulz]] for the [[Party of European Socialists]], [[Guy Verhofstadt]] for the [[Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party]], [[Ska Keller]] and [[José Bové]] jointly for the [[European Green Party]] and [[Alexis Tsipras]] for the [[Party of the European Left]]. The EPP won the most seats and Jean-Claude Juncker was nominated by the European Council and elected by the Parliament.
Line 348 ⟶ 354:
[[File:CantinesEUbrussel.jpg|thumb|These "relocation boxes" of the European Parliament, called "cantines", are ready to be transported between [[Strasbourg]] and [[Brussels]]. The EP moves back and forth to meet the EU treaty obligation to hold plenary sessions in Strasbourg.]]
 
Formally, the European Parliament has an annual "session", divided into monthly "part-sessions" and daily "sittings". In practice, this entails a monthly cycle with two committee weeks where matters are discussed in committees, political group weeks for members to discuss work within their political groups, and session weeks where members spend {{frac|3|1|2}} days in [[Strasbourg]] for part-sessions. In addition six 2-day part sessions are organised in [[Brussels]] throughout the year. Four weeks a year are allocated as constituency week to allow members to do exclusively constituency work, which they otherwise have to do at weekends. Finally there are no meetings planned during the summer weeks.<ref>{{cite web|title=European Parliament 2007 calendar of activities|publisher=European Parliament|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sed/doc/ext/hemicycle/PLAN_BRU.pdf|access-date=14 September 2009 }}</ref>
 
The Parliament has the power to meet without being convened by another authority. Its meetings are partly set out by the treaties but are otherwise up to Parliament according to its own "Rules of Procedure" (the regulations governing the parliament).<ref name=rules>{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=URISERV:o10000|title=EUR-Lex - o10000 - EN - EUR-Lex}}</ref>
Line 354 ⟶ 360:
During sittings, members may speak after being called on by the President. Members of the Council or Commission may also attend and speak in debates.<ref>{{cite web|title=Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament. Rule 141: Calling speakers and content of speeches|publisher=European Parliament|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+RULES-EP+20070101+RULE-141+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN&navigationBar=YES|access-date=12 June 2007 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament. Rule 142: Allocation of speaking time|publisher=European Parliament|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+RULES-EP+20070101+RULE-142+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN&navigationBar=YES|access-date=12 June 2007 }}</ref> Partly due to the need for interpretation, and the politics of consensus in the chamber, debates tend to be calmer and more polite than, say, the [[Westminster system]].<ref>{{cite web|last=Yeomans|first=Chris|title=Democracy 1, Autocracy 0?|publisher=Café Babel|date=2 November 2004|url=http://www.cafebabel.com/en/article.asp?T=A&Id=976|access-date=9 July 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050608053201/http://www.cafebabel.com/en/article.asp?T=A&Id=976 |archive-date=8 June 2005}}</ref> Voting is conducted primarily by a show of hands, that may be checked on request by electronic voting.<ref>{{cite web|title=Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament. Rule 164: Disputes on voting|publisher=European Parliament|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+RULES-EP+20070101+RULE-164+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN&navigationBar=YES|access-date=12 June 2007 }}</ref> Votes of MEPs are not recorded in either case, however; that only occurs when there is a roll-call ballot. This is required for the final votes on legislation and also whenever a political group or 30 MEPs request it. The number of roll-call votes has increased with time. Votes can also be a completely secret ballot (for example, when the president is elected).<ref>{{cite web|title=How do MEPs vote?|publisher=European Parliament|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?language=EN&type=IM-PRESS&reference=20060628STO09319&secondRef=0|date=28 June 2006|access-date=6 July 2007 }}</ref><ref>Hix &amp;al (see [[#Further reading|further reading]] below), §1.4 ("The dataset: roll-call votes in the European Parliament"), p.29–30.</ref> All recorded votes, along with minutes and legislation, are recorded in the ''[[Official Journal of the European Union]]'' and can be accessed online.<ref>{{cite web|title=The different types of document available on Europarl|publisher=European Parliament|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/guide/search/docsearch_en.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061016212424/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/guide/search/docsearch_en.htm|archive-date=16 October 2006|access-date=7 July 2007}}</ref> Votes usually do not follow a debate, but rather they are grouped with other due votes on specific occasions, usually at noon on Tuesdays, Wednesdays or Thursdays. This is because the length of the vote is unpredictable and if it continues for longer than allocated it can disrupt other debates and meetings later in the day.<ref name="Corbett 174">{{Cite book|last=Corbett|first=Richard|author-link=Richard Corbett|author2=Francis Jacobs|author3=Michael Shackleton|title=The European Parliament|edition=7|year=2007|place=London|publisher=John Harper|isbn=978-0-9551144-7-2|page=174|author-link2=Francis Jacobs}}</ref>
 
Members sit in a [[Hemicycle (chamber)|hemicycle]] according to their political groups (in the Common Assembly, prior to 1958, members sat alphabetically<ref name="Corbett 167"/>) who are ordered mainly by left to right. All desks are equipped with microphones, headphones for listening to interpretaion, and electronic voting equipment. The leaders of the Groups sit on the front benches, and in the very centre is a podium for guest speakers. The remaining half of the circular chamber is primarily composed of the raised area where the President and staff sit. Further benches are provided between the sides of this area and the MEPs, these are taken up by the Council on the far left and the Commission on the far right. Both the Brussels and Strasbourg hemicycle roughly follow this layout with only minor differences.<ref>{{cite web|title=Brussels seating plan|publisher=European Parliament|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sce/data/fast_access/doc//PLAN_BRX_30%20JAN_2008.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080227035017/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sce/data/fast_access/doc//PLAN_BRX_30%20JAN_2008.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-date=27 February 2008|access-date=12 June 2007 }}</ref> The hemicycle design is a compromise between the different Parliamentary systems. The British-based system has the different groups directly facing each other while the French-based system is a semicircle (and the traditional German system had all members in rows facing a rostrum for speeches). Although the design is mainly based on a semicircle, the opposite ends of the spectrum do still face each other.<ref name="Corbett 167">{{Cite book|last=Corbett|first=Richard|author-link=Richard Corbett|author2=Francis Jacobs|author3=Michael Shackleton|title=The European Parliament|edition=7|year=2007|place=London|publisher=John Harper|isbn=978-0-9665544-7-2|page=167|author-link2=Francis Jacobs}}</ref>
 
Access to the chamber limited, entrance is controlled by ushers who also aid MEPs in the chamber (for example in delivering documents). The ushers can also occasionally act as a form of police in enforcing the President, for example in ejecting an MEP who is disrupting the session (although this is rare). The first head of protocol in the Parliament was French, so many of the duties in the Parliament are based on the French model first developed following the [[French Revolution]]. The ushers are highly visible in the Parliament, dressed in black [[Tailcoat|tails]] and wearing a silver chain, and are [[EU Concours|recruited]] in the same manner as the [[European Civil Service|European civil service]]. The President is allocated a personal usher.<ref>{{cite web|title=The European Parliament Ushers|publisher=European Parliament|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?language=EN&type=IM-PRESS&reference=20051017FCS01532&secondRef=0|access-date=21 June 2007 }}</ref>
Line 382 ⟶ 388:
The Parliament has 20 [[Standing Committee]]s ranging in size from 25 to 88 MEPs (each reflecting the political make-up of the whole Parliament) including a chair, a bureau and secretariat. They meet twice a month in public to draw up, amend to adopt legislative proposals and reports to be presented to the plenary.<ref name="Organised">{{cite web|title=Organisation|publisher=European Parliament|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/aboutparliament/en/20150201PVL00010/Organisation|access-date=3 May 2016|quote=In order to do the preparatory work for Parliament's plenary sittings, the Members are divided up among a number of specialised standing committees. There are 20 parliamentary committees. A committee consists of between 25 and 71 MEPs, and has a chair, a bureau and a secretariat. The political make-up of the committees reflects that of the plenary assembly. }}</ref> The [[rapporteur]]s for a committee are supposed to present the view of the committee, although notably this has not always been the case: in the events leading to the resignation of the Santer Commission, the rapporteur went against the [[Committee on Budgetary Control|Budgetary Control Committee's]] narrow vote to discharge the budget, and urged the Parliament to reject it.<ref name="Ringe">{{cite web |last=Ringer |first=Nils F. |title=The Santer Commission Resignation Crisis |publisher=[[University of Pittsburgh]] |date=February 2003 |url=http://aei.pitt.edu/2919/01/156.pdf |access-date=7 October 2007 }}</ref>
 
The Parliament can also set up sub-committees (e.g. the [[Subcommittee on Human Rights]]) and temporary committees to deal with a specific topic (e.g. the Special Committee on Foreign Interference in Democratic Processes in the European Union, 2020-232020–23). The chairs of the Committees co-ordinate their work through the "[[Committees of the European Parliament#Conference of Committee Chairs|Conference of Committee Chairmen]]".<ref name="Organised"/>
 
The nature of the committees differ from their national counterparts as, although smaller in comparison to those of the [[United States Congressional committee|United States Congress]], the European Parliament's committees are unusually large by European standards with between eight and twelve dedicated members of staff and three to four support staff. Considerable administration, archives and research resources are also at the disposal of the whole Parliament when needed.<ref name="Kreppel"/>
Line 391 ⟶ 397:
[[File:Dvorana Jožeta Pučnika Jože Pučnik Hall.jpg|thumb|[[Jože Pučnik]] conference room]]
 
The [[Intergroups in the European Parliament]] are informal fora which gather MEPs from various political groups around any topic. They do not express the view of the European Parliament. They serve a double purpose: to address a topic which is transversal to several committees and in a less formal manner. Their daily secretariat can be run either through the office of MEPs or through interest groups, be them corporate lobbies or NGOs. The favored access to MEPs which the organization running the secretariat enjoys can be one explanation to the multiplication of Intergroups in the 1990s.<ref>[http://www.cairn.info/revue-politique-europeenne-2003-1-page-123.htm Dutoit Laurent, « L'influence au sein du Parlement européen : les intergroupes », Politique européenne 1/2003 (n° 9), p. 123-142].</ref> They are now strictly regulated and financial support, direct or otherwise (via Secretariat staff, for example), must be officially specified in a declaration of financial interests.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pdf/intergroupes/legislature_8/DecisionofCoPof16Dec1999-Rules_governing_the_establishment_of_integroupes.pdf|title=Article 6, Rules governing the establishment of intergroups, decision of the Conference of Presidents, 16 december 1999 (last updated 11 September 2014)}}</ref> <ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RULES-9-2023-11-01-RULE-035_EN.html | title=Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament - Rule 35 - Intergroups - November 2023 }}</ref> Also Intergroups are established or renewed at the beginning of each legislature through a specific process. Indeed, the proposal for the constitution or renewal of an Intergroup must be supported by at least 3 political groups who can each support a limited number of proposals in proportion to their size (for example, for the legislature 2014–2019, the EPP or S&D political groups could support 22 proposals whereas the Greens/EFA or the EFDD political groups only 7).<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pdf/intergroupes/legislature_8/DecisionofCoPof16Dec1999-Rules_governing_the_establishment_of_integroupes.pdf|title=Annex 1, Rules governing the establishment of intergroups, decision of the Conference of Presidents, 16 december 1999 (last updated 11 September 2014)}}</ref>
 
===Translation and interpretation===
Line 420 ⟶ 426:
On 12 December 2022, President Metsola announced that all work with Qatar would be suspended.<ref name="EA">{{cite news |date=12 December 2022 |title=EU Parliament suspends work with Qatar as MEPs demand corruption probe |newspaper=[[EurActiv]] |url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/justice-home-affairs/news/eu-parliament-suspends-work-with-qatar-as-meps-demand-corruption-probe/|access-date=12 December 2022}}</ref>
 
A [[European Union]] correspondent, Jack Parrock confirmed on the basis of close sources to Qatar that the UAE was involved in plotting the corruption scandal. Parrock said the official investigations, leaked documents and a number of European sources have confirmed the Emirati involvement in planning the alleged bribery case against Qatar. In a separate report by The European Microscope, documents revealed that the UAE made extensive efforts to woo multiple members of the European Parliament. Abu Dhabi intensified the lobbying campaign to build its support within the European Parliament and to push its members to speak in favour of the Emirates.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://emiratesleaks.com/2022/12/revealed-uae-involved-in-the-so-called-qatar-corruption-scandal-in-the-eu/?lang=en|title=Revealed: UAE involved in the so-called Qatar corruption scandal in the EU|access-date=14 December 2022|website=Emirati Leaks|date=14 December 2022|archive-date=2 January 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200102225119/https://emiratesleaks.com/2022/12/revealed-uae-involved-in-the-so-called-qatar-corruption-scandal-in-the-eu/?lang=en|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite tweet |user=jackeparrock |number=1602966494450778113 |date=14 December 2022 |title=Breaking: Confirmed sources close to power #Qatar have told me that in the government in Doha, 'everyone believes the #UAE is behind it [hatching a conspiracy]', in relation to the escalating corruption scandal engulfing the European Parliament. #Kaili #QatarGate |access-date=14 December 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.watanserb.com/2022/12/14/مصادر-حكومية-قطرية-تؤكد-وقوف-الإمارات/ |title=مصادر حكومية قطرية تؤكد وقوف الإمارات وراء مؤامرة ضدها في البرلمان الأوروبي |trans-title=Qatari government sources confirm that the UAE is behind a plot against it in the European Parliament |date=14 December 2022 |first1=Salem Muhammad |last1=Hanafi |newspaper=[[Watan (newspaper)|Watan]] |language=ar}}</ref> After Qatari officials, an Italian web publisher, Dagospia alleged that the UAE's plan against Qatar involved Tahnoun bin Zayed. It is alleged that the brother of UAE President [[Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan]] gave Belgium the tips that lead to the investigations against Qatar.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.dagospia.com/rubrica-29/cronache/emiri-contro-ndash-ogni-giorno-che-passa-prende-sempre-piu-corpo-336537.htm |title=Emiri Contro – Ogni Giorno Che Passa, Prende Sempre Più Corpo L'ipotesi Che Dietro Al Qatargate Ci Sia La Manona Degli Emirati Arabi Uniti. Un'ipotesi Ormai Ventilata Apertamente Da Doha - A Fornire La "Soffiata" Al Belgio Sarebbe Stato Tahnoun Bin Zayed Mohammed Al Nahyan, Fratello Del Presidente Emiratino, Mohamed Bin Zayed – Tahnoun, Consigliere Per La Sicurezza Nazionale, È Il Capo Dei Servizi Emiratini, E Recentemente Si È Parlato Di Lui Per Una Tentata Operazione In Israele: Voleva Comprare Il Colosso Assicurativo "Phoenix Group", Ma…Ma... |trans-title=Emirs against – Every day that passes, the hypothesis that the Manona of the United Arab Emirates is behind the Qatargate is gaining more and more traction. A hypothesis now openly aired by Doha - Tahnoun Bin Zayed Mohammed Al Nahyan, brother of the UAE president, would have provided the "tip" to Belgium - Tahnoun, national security adviser, is the head of the UAE services, And Recently There Was Talk Of Him For An Attempted Operation In Israel: He Wanted To Buy The Insurance Giant "Phoenix Group", But…But... |website=Dagospia |date=21 December 2022 }} [https://dagospia.com/la-strategia-degli-emiri-per-il-qatargate-negare-tutto-e-urlare-al-complotto-336537 mobile url]</ref>
 
At the same meeting the [[Greens–European Free Alliance]] and [[Renew Europe]] both called for an inquiry committee to be set up by the European Parliament.{{r|EA}} The suspension of Parliamentary business at this time was significant as it came just three days before the Parliament was due to vote on introducing a [[Travel visa|visa-free travel]] agreement with Qatar and other countries.{{r|EA}} This resulted in the vote on visa-free travel to Ecuador, Kuwait, and Oman also being canceled.<ref>{{cite web |date=12 December 2022 |title=EU Parliament Postpones Voting on Schengen Visa Exemption for Ecuador |url=https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/news/eu-parliament-postpones-voting-on-schengen-visa-exemption-for-ecuador/ |access-date=13 December 2022 |website=Schengen Visa Info}}</ref> In addition, a major and controversial [[Air transport agreement|air transit agreement]] that would have allowed [[Qatar Airways]] unlimited access to the EU market was put on hold after warning that Qatar may have interfered in Parliament's internal deliberations on the agreement.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-12-13 |title=Scandal pushes MEPs to review Qatar Airways' access deal with EU |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/scandal-european-parliament-qatar-airways/ |access-date=|website=[[Politico]] |language=en}}</ref> During the negotiations there was criticism by EU member states that the agreement, negotiated by the Parliament's [[European Parliament Committee on Transport and Tourism|transport committee]], was unduly favourable of Qatar.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2018-01-05 |title=Troubled skies over attempt to protect EU's aviation industry |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/troubled-skies-over-attempt-to-protect-eus-aviation-industry/ |access-date=|website=[[Politico]] |language=en}}</ref>
Line 431 ⟶ 437:
 
There are also ongoing concerns related to allegations that members of the European Parliament were illegally or unethically influenced by Russia. Such concerns have been raised several times in 2023 and 2024 and dubbed "Russiagate".<ref>{{Cite web |first1=Pedro |last1=Marques |first2=Gabriele |last2=Bischoff |first3=Andreas |last3=Schieder |first4=Raphaël |last4=Glucksmann |first5=Tonino |last5=Picula |first6=Domènec |last6=Ruiz Devesa |title=Motion for a resolution on Russiagate: allegations of Russian interference in the democratic processes of the European Union |id=B9-0125/2024 |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2024-0125_EN.html |access-date=2024-02-09 |website=European Parliament |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-02-05 |title=Cs Asked Metsola That The European Parliament Investigate Puigdemont For Russian Espionage |url=https://worldnationnews.com/cs-asked-metsola-that-the-european-parliament-will-investigate-puigdemont-for-russian-espionage/ |website=World Nation |access-date=2024-02-09 |language=en-US |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240207014901/https://worldnationnews.com/cs-asked-metsola-that-the-european-parliament-will-investigate-puigdemont-for-russian-espionage/ |archive-date= Feb 7, 2024 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-01-30 |title=Latvian member of European Parliament accused of spying officially under investigation |url=https://news.yahoo.com/latvian-member-european-parliament-accused-074420015.html |access-date=2024-02-09 |website=Yahoo News |language=en-US}}</ref>
 
Panzeri's lobbying group, Fight Impunity, was largely funded by [[Iqbal Survé]], a controversial South African billionaire. Survé's [[Sekunjalo Investments|Sekunjalo Development Foundation]] was found to be the "most important donor" having donated €250,000 to the group.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cohen |first=Tim |date=2022-12-21 |title=Iqbal Survé's Sekunjalo Development Foundation linked to EU scandal |url=https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2022-12-21-iqbal-surves-sekunjalo-development-foundation-linked-to-organisation-at-centre-of-eu-corruption-scandal/ |access-date=2024-06-09 |website=Daily Maverick |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Brussels to question ex-commissioner over Qatar scandal |url=https://www.ft.com/content/23f27ce6-b12e-4426-aea7-36c1b58cee76 |access-date=2024-06-09 |website=www.ft.com}}</ref>
 
==Annual costs==
Line 476 ⟶ 484:
==Channels of dialogue, information, and communication with European civil society==
 
Individual MEPs are the main point of contact for citizens with the Parliament. They normally have an office in their constiuency and travel back at the end of every week (and during weeks without parliamentary meetings) to participate in an array of meetings, events, interviews, visits and suchlike with voters, businesses, trade unions, local authoritesauthorities and media.
 
The Parliament itself maintains a detailed website,<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/home | title=About Parliament }}</ref> receives around one million visitiorsvisitors a year, and streamlines debates and committee meetings.
 
Over the last few years, European institutions have committed to promoting transparency, openness, and the availability of information about their work.<ref>{{Cite report|author=Juan Mayoral|date=February 2011|title=Democratic improvements in the European Union under the Lisbon Treaty Institutional changes regarding democratic government in the EU|publisher=European Union Democracy Observatory (EUDO). Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute|access-date=25 May 2017|url=https://www.eui.eu/Projects/EUDO-Institutions/Documents/EUDOreport922011.pdf|language=en|archive-date=30 May 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170530022226/http://www.eui.eu/Projects/EUDO-Institutions/Documents/EUDOreport922011.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> In particular, transparency is regarded as pivotal to the action of European institutions and a general principle of EU law, to be applied to the activities of EU institutions in order to strengthen the Union's democratic foundation.<ref>{{Cite journal|author=Giordano Locchi|language=it|date=8 February 2017|title=Il principio di trasparenza in Europa nei suoi risvolti in termini di Governance amministrativa e di comunicazione istituzionale dell'Unione|journal=Amministrazione in Cammino|access-date=22 May 2017|url=https://www.dispi.unisi.it/sites/st06/files/allegatiparagrafo/08-02-2017/locchi_principio-di-trasparenza_e-governance_11.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170803052649/https://www.dispi.unisi.it/sites/st06/files/allegatiparagrafo/08-02-2017/locchi_principio-di-trasparenza_e-governance_11.pdf|archive-date=3 August 2017|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> The general principles of openness and transparency are reaffirmed in the articles 8 A, point 3 and 10.3 of the [[Treaty of Lisbon]] and the [[Maastricht Treaty]] respectively, stating that "every citizen shall have the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union. Decisions shall be taken as openly and as closely as possible to the citizen".<ref name="eur-lex.europa.eu">{{Cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3AC2007%2F306%2F01|title=Trattato di Lisbona che modifica il Trattato sull'Unione europea e il Trattato che istituisce la Comunità europea (2007/C 306/01)|website=eur-lex.europa.eu|publisher=EUR-lex}}</ref><ref name="eur-lex.europa.eu-2">{{Cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:2bf140bf-a3f8-4ab2-b506-fd71826e6da6.0017.02/DOC_1&format=PDF|title=Trattato sull'Unione europea (Versione consolidata)|website=eur-lex.europa.eu|access-date=23 May 2017|language=it}}</ref> Furthermore, both treaties acknowledge the value of dialogue between citizens, representative associations, civil society, and European institutions.<ref name="eur-lex.europa.eu" /><ref name="eur-lex.europa.eu-2" />
Line 535 ⟶ 543:
* {{cite book |last=Attwool |first=Elspeth |author-link=Elspeth Attwooll |title=To the Power of Ten: UK Liberal Democrats in the European Parliament (Centre for Reform Papers) |publisher=[[Open Europe]] |year=2000 |isbn=978-1-902622-17-0 }}
* {{cite book |last=Butler |first=David |author-link=David Butler (academic) |author2=Martin Westlake |title=British Politics and European Election |publisher=[[Palgrave Macmillan]] |year=2005 |location=London |isbn=978-1-4039-3585-4 }}
 
* {{Cite book |last1=Corbett |first1=Richard |author-link=Richard Corbett |last2=Jacobs |first2=Francis |last3=Shackleton |first3=Michael |title=The European Parliament |edition=9th |publisher=John Harper Publishing |date=2016 |location=London |isbn=978-0-9564508-5-2}} The same three co-authors have written every edition since the first in 1990.
* {{cite book |last=Corbett |first=Richard |author-link=Richard Corbett |title=The European Parliament's Role in Closer EU Integration |publisher=[[Palgrave Macmillan]] |date=June 1998 |location=LBasingstoke |isbn=978-0333722527 }}
Line 559 ⟶ 566:
* {{cite book |last=Wood |first=David M. |author2=Birol A. Yesilada |title=The Emerging European Union (4th Ed.) |publisher=Pearson Longman |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-321-43941-3 }}
{{refend}}
 
 
==External links==