Eusebius: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
m Connections
(43 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown)
Line 6:
| caption = 6th century [[Syriac Christianity|Syriac]] portrait of St. Eusebius of Caesarea from the [[Rabbula Gospels]]
| birth_date={{Circa|260}}–265
| birth_place= [[Caesarea Maritima]], [[Syria Palaestina]], [[Roman Empire]]
| death_date=30 May 339 (aged 74–79)<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', pp. 94, 278</ref>
| death_place= Caesarea Maritima, Syria Palaestina, Roman Empire
| occupation=[[Bishop]], [[historian]], [[theologian]]
| nationality=
| period=[[Constantinian dynasty]]
| movement=
Line 23:
| titles = The Father of Church History
| venerated_in = [[Oriental Orthodox Church]]<ref>"The Church Historian and Metropolitan of Caesarea for twenty five years is included, on the list, among the Syrian martyrs and those who vouched for true faith (Wace & Piercy, 1999)." from Cor-Episcopo K. Mani Rajan's 'Martyrs, Saints, and Prelates of the Syriac Orthodox Church Volume 2'' published in 2012 on his website: http://rajanachen.com/download-english-books/</ref>
| feast_day = {{ubl|May 30 (ancient Syrian Church)<ref>Shown in the [[Martyrology of 411]] translated by [[William Wright (orientalist)|William Wright]] in 1866 where it states under May 30, "The Commemoration ofbof Eusebius, bishop of Palestine" (p. 427) which Wright confirms in the preface is "Eusebius of Caesareia" (p. 45). https://archive.org/details/WrightAnAncientSyrianMartyrology/page/n1/mode/2up</ref> February 29 (Syrian Orthodox)<ref>"His memory is celebrated on 29 February." from Cor-Episcopo K. Mani Rajan's 'Martyrs, Saints, and Prelates of the Syriac Orthodox Church Volume 2' published in 2012 on his website: http://rajanachen.com/download-english-books/</ref> |June 21 (Roman Catholic; Suppressed by [[Pope Gregory XIII]])<ref>Bishop J.B. Lightfoot writes in his entry for St. Eusebius in Henry Wace's ''Dictionary of Christian Biography and Literature to the End of the Sixth Century AD, with an Account of Principal Sects and Heresies'' (1911) that while "in the Martyrologium Romanum itself he held his place for centuries," in "the revision of this Martyrology under Gregory XIII his name was struck out, and Eusebius of Samosata was substituted, under the mistaken idea that Caesarea had been substituted for Samosata by a mistake." (p. 536)</ref><ref>Multiple references for this day as the feast of St. Eusebius in multiple Roman Catholic martyrologies and lectionaries, as recorded by Henri Valois, or Valesius in his ''Testimonies of the Ancients in Favor of Eusebius'' and translated by Philip Schaff https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.iv.html</ref>}}
| influences = [[Origen]], [[St. Pamphilus of Caesarea]], St. [[Constantine the Great]], [[Sextus Julius Africanus]], [[Philo]], [[Plato]]
| influenced = St. [[Palladius of Galatia]], [[Basil of Caesarea|St. Basil the Great]], [[Tyrannius Rufinus|Rufinus of Aquileia]], [[Theodoret|St. Theodoret of Cyrus]], [[Socrates of Constantinople]], [[Sozomen]], [[Evagrius Scholasticus]], [[Gelasius of Cyzicus]], [[Michael the Syrian]], [[St. Jerome]], [[Philostorgius]], [[Victorius of Aquitaine]], St. [[Pope Gelasius I]], [[Pope Pelagius II]], [[Henri Valois]], [[George Bull]], [[William Cave]], [[Samuel Lee (linguist)|Samuel Lee]], [[J.B. Lightfoot]], [[Henry Wace (priest)|Henry Wace]]
}}
 
'''Eusebius of Caesarea''' ({{IPAc-en|j|uː|ˈ|s|iː|b|i|ə|s}}; {{lang-grc-gre|Εὐσέβιος τῆς Καισαρείας}} {{transliteration|grc|Eusebios tēs Kaisareias}}; {{c.}} 260/265&nbsp;– 30 May 339), also known as '''Eusebius Pamphilus'''<ref>{{citation |author=Eusebius |authorlink=Eusebius of Caesaria |url=https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.toc.html |title=Church History, Life of Constantine the Great, and Oration in Praise of Constantine |series=''A Select Library of the Christian Church: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers'', 2nd ser., vol. I |translator-last=Schaff |translator-first=Philip |editor=Henry Wace |display-editors=0 |publisher=T. & T. Clark |location=Edinburgh |date=1876}}.</ref> (from the {{lang-grc-gre|Εὐσέβιος τοῦ Παμφίλου}}), was a [[Greeks|Greek]]<ref>{{Cite book|last=Jacobsen|first=Anders-Christian|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/180106520|title=Three Greek apologists Origen, Eusebius, and Athanasius = Drei griechische Apologeten|date=2007|others=Ulrich, Jörg|isbn=978-3-631-56833-0|location=Frankfurt, M|pages=1|oclc=180106520}}</ref> or [[PalestiniansSyria Palaestina|Syro-Palestinian]]<ref>{{cite book | last1=Richardson | first1=E.C. | last2=Wace | first2=H. | last3=McGiffert | first3=A.C. | last4=Schaff | first4=P. | title=Eusebius - Church History, Life of Constantine the Great, and Oration in Praise of Constantine | publisher=Parker | series=Select library of Nicene and post-Nicene fathers of the Christian Church | year=1890 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8-mBbkoNmv8C |page=4|quote=His birthplace cannot be determined with certainty. The fact that he is called "Eusebius the Palestinian " by [[Marcellus of Ancyra|Marcellus]] (''Euseb. lib. adv. Marcell.'' I. 4), [[Basil of Caesarea|Basil]] (''Lib. ad. Amphil. de Spir. Sancto'', c. 29), and others, does not prove that he was a Palestinian by birth; for the epithet may be used to indicate merely his place of residence (he was bishop of Cæsarea in Palestine for many years). Moreover, the argument urged by [[Franz Joseph von Stein|Stein]] and [[J. B. Lightfoot|Lightfoot]] in support of his Palestinian birth, namely, that it was customary to elect to the episcopate of any church a native of the city in preference to a native of some other place, does not count for much. All that seems to have been demanded was that a man should have been already a member of the particular church over which he was to be made bishop, and even this rule was not universal (see [[Joseph Bingham|Bingham]]'s Antiquities, II. 10, 2 and 3). The fact that he was bishop of Cæsarea therefore would at most warrant us in concluding only that he had made his residence in Cæsarea for some time previous to his election to that office. Nevertheless, although neither of these arguments proves his Palestinian birth, it is very probable that he was a native of that country, or at least of that section. He was acquainted with Syriac as well as with Greek, which circumstance taken in connection with his ignorance of Latin (see below, p. 47) points to the region of Syria as his birthplace. Moreover, we learn from his own testimony that he was in Cæsarea while still a youth (''[[Life of Constantine|Vita Constantini]]'', I. 19), and in his epistle to the church of Cæsarea (see below, p. 16) he says that he was taught the creed of the Cæsarean church in his childhood (or at least at the beginning of his Christian life: έν τή κατηχήσει), and that he accepted it at baptism. It would seem therefore that he must have lived while still a child either in Cæsarea itself, or in the neighborhood, where its creed was in use. Although no one therefore (except [[Theodore Metochites|Theodorus Metochita]] of the fourteenth century, in his ''Cap. Miscell.'' 17; [[Jacques Paul Migne|Migne]], ''[[Patrologia Latina|Patr. Lat.]]'' CXLIV. 949) directly states that Eusebius was a Palestinian by birth, we have every reason to suppose him such.}}</ref> [[historian of Christianity]], [[exegete]], and [[Christianity|Christian]] [[polemicist]]. In about AD 314 he became the [[bishop]] of [[Caesarea Maritima]] in the [[Roman province]] of [[Syria Palaestina]].

Together with [[Pamphilus of Caesarea|Pamphilus]], heEusebius was a scholar of the [[biblical canon]] and is regarded as one of the most learned Christians during [[late antiquity]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cQW0ACdLn6kC|title=The Story of Christianity: Volume 1: The Early Church to the Dawn of the Reformation|last=Gonzalez|first=Justo L.|date=2010-08-10|publisher=Zondervan|isbn=978-0-06-185588-7|pages=149–150|language=en}}</ref> He wrote the ''Demonstrations of the Gospel'', ''[[Preparation for the gospel|Preparations for the Gospel]]'' and ''On Discrepancies between the Gospels'', studies of the biblical text. His work ''[[Onomasticon (Eusebius)|Onomasticon]]'' is an early [[Historical geography|geographical lexicon]] of places in the [[Holy Land]] mentioned in the Bible. As "Father of [[Church history|Church History]]"{{NoteTag|Eusebius is considered the first historian of Christianity.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/audiences/2007/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20070613.html |title=General Audience of 13 June 2007: Eusebius of Caesarea {{!}} BENEDICT XVI |access-date=2021-06-01 |website=www.vatican.va}}</ref>}} (not to be confused with the title of [[Church Fathers|Church Father]]), he produced the ''[[Church History (Eusebius)|Ecclesiastical History]]'', ''On the Life of Pamphilus'', the ''Chronicle'' and ''On the Martyrs''. He also produced [[Life of Constantine|a biographical work]] on [[Constantine the Great]], the first Christian [[Roman emperor]], who was [[Augustus (title)|''augustusAugustus'']] between AD 306 and AD 337.
 
==Sources==
Line 55 ⟶ 57:
The theological views of Arius, that taught the subordination of the [[God the Son|Son]] to the [[God the Father|Father]], continued to be controversial. [[Eustathius of Antioch]] strongly opposed the growing influence of [[Origen]]'s theology as the root of [[Arianism]]. Eusebius, an admirer of Origen, was reproached by [[Eustathius of Antioch|Eustathius]] for deviating from the Nicene faith. Eusebius prevailed and Eustathius was deposed at a [[synod]] in [[Antioch]].{{citation needed|date=January 2021}}
 
However, [[Athanasius of Alexandria]] became a more powerful opponent and in 334 he was summoned before a synod in Caesarea (which he refused to attend). In the following year, he was again summoned before a [[First Synod of Tyre|synod in Tyre]] at which Eusebius of Caesarea presided. Athanasius, foreseeing the result, went to [[Constantinople]] to bring his cause before the Emperor. Constantine called the bishops to his court, among them Eusebius. Athanasius was condemned and exiled at the end of 335. Eusebius remained in the Emperor's favour throughout this time and more than once was exonerated with the explicit approval of the Emperor Constantine.{{citation needed|date=January 2021}} After the Emperor's death (c. {{circa|337}}), Eusebius wrote the ''[[Life of Constantine]]'', an important historical work because of eyewitness accounts and the use of primary sources.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KchhO8KEy3cC&q=%22Life+of+Constantine%22|title=Eusebius' Life of Constantine|publisher=Clarendon Press|year=1999|isbn=978-0-19-158847-1|editor-last=Cameron|editor-first=Averil|editor-link=Averil Cameron|series=Clarendon Ancient History|location=Oxford|language=en|editor-last2=Hall|editor-first2=Stuart G.}}</ref>
 
==Works==
Line 98 ⟶ 100:
* the martyrdom of [[Pionius]];
* the martyrdoms of [[Carpus and Papylus|Carpus, Papylus]], and [[Carpus and Papylus|Agathonike]];
* the martyrdoms in the congregations of [[Vienne (department)|Vienne]] and [[Lyon]];
* the martyrdom of Apollonius.
 
Line 123 ⟶ 125:
* Small fragments of commentaries on [[Epistle to the Romans|Romans]] and [[1 Corinthians]].
 
Eusebius also wrote a work '{{lang|la|Quaestiones ad Stephanum et Marinum}}, ''On the Differences of the Gospels'' (including solutions). This was written for the purpose of harmonizing the contradictions in the reports of the different Evangelists. This work was recently (2011) translated into the English language by David J. Miller and Adam C. McCollum and was published under the name ''Eusebius of Caesarea: Gospel Problems and Solutions''.<ref>{{cite book|title=Eusebius of Caesarea: Gospel Problems and Solutions (Ancient Texts in Translation): Roger Pearse, David J Miller, Adam C McCollum: 9780956654014: Amazon.com: Books |date= 2010-03-06|isbn = 978-0956654014|last1 = Caesaea|first1 = Eusebius of|last2= Miller|first2= David J. D.|last3= McCollum|first3= Adam C.|last4= Downer|first4= Carol|last5= Zamagni|first5= Claudio|publisher= Chieftain}}</ref> The original work was also translated into [[Syriac language|Syriac]], and lengthy quotations exist in a ''[[Catena (biblical commentary)|catena]]'' in that language, and also in [[Arabic]] catenas.<ref>Georg Graf, ''Geschichte der christlichen arabischen Literatur'' vol. 1</ref>
 
Eusebius also wrote treatises on the biblical past; these three treatises have been lost. They were:
Line 136 ⟶ 138:
 
==Doctrine==
 
{{Original research section|date=December 2019}}
Eusebius is fairly unusual in his [[preterist]], or fulfilled, eschatological view. Saying "the Holy Scriptures foretell that there will be unmistakable signs of the Coming of Christ. Now there were among the Hebrews three outstanding offices of dignity, which made the nation famous, firstly the kingship, secondly that of prophet, and lastly the high priesthood. The prophecies said that the abolition and complete destruction of all these three together would be the sign of the presence of the Christ. And that the proofs that the times had come, would lie in the ceasing of the Mosaic worship, the desolation of Jerusalem and its Temple, and the subjection of the whole Jewish race to its enemies. ...The holy oracles foretold that all these changes, which had not been made in the days of the prophets of old, would take place at the coming of the Christ, which I will presently shew to have been fulfilled as never before in accordance with the predictions" (''Demonstratio Evangelica'' VIII).
 
From a [[dogma]]tic point of view, Eusebius standsis entirelyrelated uponin thehis shouldersviews ofto [[Origen]]. Like Origen, he started from the fundamental thought of the absolute sovereignty (''monarchia'') of God. God is the cause of all beings. But he is not merely a cause; in him everything good is included, from him all life originates, and he is the source of all virtue. God sent Christ into the world that it may partake of the blessings included in the essence of God. Eusebius expressly distinguishes the Son as distinct from Father as a ray is also distinct from its source the sun.{{Citation needed|date=January 2014}}
 
Eusebius held that men were sinners by their own free choice and not by the necessity of their natures. Eusebius said:
Line 150 ⟶ 152:
In the June 2002 issue of the [[Church History (journal)|''Church History'']] journal, Pier Franco Beatrice reports that Eusebius testified that the word ''[[Homoousion|homoousios]]'' ([[Consubstantiality|consubstantial]]) "was inserted in the Nicene Creed solely by the personal order of Constantine."<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Beatrice|first=Pier Franco|date=June 2002|title=The Word "Homoousios" from Hellenism to Christianity|journal=Church History|volume=71|issue=2|pages=243–272|jstor=4146467|doi=10.1017/S0009640700095688|s2cid=162605872}}</ref>
{{Blockquote|text=According to Eusebius of Caesarea, the word ''homoousios'' was inserted in the Nicene Creed solely by the personal order of Constantine. But this statement is highly problematic. It is very difficult to explain the seeming paradoxical fact that this word, along with the explanation given by Constantine, was accepted by the "Arian" Eusebius, whereas it has left no traces at all in the works of his opponents, the leaders of the anti-Arian party such as Alexander of Alexandria, [[Hosius of Corduba|Ossius of Cordova]], [[Marcellus of Ancyra]], and [[Eustathius of Antioch]], who are usually considered Constantine's theological advisers and the strongest supporters of the council. Neither before nor during Constantine's time is there any evidence of a normal, well-established Christian use of the term ''homoousios'' in its strictly [[Trinitarian]] meaning. Having once excluded any relationship of the Nicene ''homoousios'' with the Christian tradition, it becomes legitimate to propose a new explanation, based on an analysis of two pagan documents which have so far never been taken into account. The main thesis of this paper is that ''homoousios'' came straight from Constantine's [[Hermeticism|Hermetic]] background. As can be clearly seen in the ''[[Poimandres]]'', and even more clearly in an inscription mentioned exclusively in the ''Theosophia'', in the theological language of [[Ancient Egyptian religion|Egyptian paganism]] the word ''homoousios'' meant that the Nous-Father and the Logos-Son, who are two distinct beings, share the same perfection of the divine nature.|author=Pier Franco Beatrice|title="The Word 'Homoousios' from Hellenism to Christianity"|source=''Church History'', Volume 71, № 2, June 2002, p. 243}}
 
However, the council evidently did not force the insertion of the word and instead adopted a text related to the confession of Jerusalem.<ref name="Ferguson">Ferguson, Everett "Encyclopedia of Early Christianity, 2nd edition" Routledge, 2013, p. 811.</ref> The role of Constantine remained uncertain during the council.<ref name="Ayres">Ayres, Lewis "Nicaea and its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth Century Trinitarian Theology" OUP Oxford, 2004, p. 89.</ref>
 
==Assessment==
Line 156 ⟶ 160:
* When his own honesty was challenged by his contemporaries,<ref>See Gibbon's ''Vindication'' for examples of the accusations that he faced.</ref> Gibbon appealed to a chapter heading in Eusebius' ''[[Preparation for the Gospel|Praeparatio evangelica]]'' (Book XII, Chapter 31)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/eusebius_pe_12_book12.htm|title=Eusebius of Caesarea: Praeparatio Evangelica (translated by E.H. Gifford)|publisher=tertullian.org|access-date=2013-03-04}}</ref> in which Eusebius discussed "that it will be necessary sometimes to use falsehood as a remedy for the benefit of those who require such a mode of treatment."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tertullian.org/rpearse/eusebius/pe_data.htm|title=Data for discussing the meaning of pseudos and Eusebius in PE XII, 31|publisher=tertullian.org|access-date=2008-02-01}}</ref>
* Although Gibbon refers to Eusebius as the "gravest" of the ecclesiastical historians,<ref>"The gravest of the ecclesiastical historians, Eusebius himself, indirectly confesses, that he has related whatever might redound to the glory, and that he has suppressed all that could tend to the disgrace, of religion." (History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Vol II, Chapter XVI)</ref> he also suggests that Eusebius was more concerned with the passing political concerns of his time than with his duty as a reliable historian.<ref>"Such an acknowledgment will naturally excite a suspicion that a writer who has so openly violated one of the fundamental laws of history has not paid a very strict regard to the observance of the other; and the suspicion will derive additional credit from the character of Eusebius, which was less tinctured with credulity, and more practised in the arts of courts, than that of almost any of his contemporaries." (History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Vol II, Chapter XVI)</ref>
* [[Jacob Burckhardt]] (19th century cultural historian) dismissed Eusebius as "the first thoroughly dishonest historian of antiquity".<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Singh |first=Devin |date=2015 |title=Eusebius as Political Theologian: The Legend Continues |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/abs/eusebius-as-political-theologian-the-legend-continues/85D2326BD1AEDC36550AD826D9B7E42B |journal=Harvard Theological Review |volume=108 |pages=129–154 |doi=10.1017/S0017816015000073 |quote=...and the eminent historian Jacob Burckhardt who declared Eusebius to be “the most objectionable of all eulogists” and “first thoroughly dishonest historian of antiquity.”}}</ref>
* [[Jacob Burckhardt]] (19th century cultural historian) dismissed Eusebius as "the first thoroughly dishonest historian of antiquity".
* Other critics of Eusebius' work cite the panegyrical tone of the ''Vita'', plus the omission of internal Christian conflicts in the ''Canones'', as reasons to interpret his writing with caution.<ref>Burgess, R. W., and Witold Witakowski. 1999. Studies in Eusebian and Post-Eusebian chronography 1.'' The "Chronici canones" of Eusebius of Caesarea: structure, content and chronology, AD 282–325&nbsp;– 2. The "Continuatio Antiochiensis Eusebii": a chronicle of Antioch and the Roman Near East during the Reigns of Constantine and Constantius II, AD 325–350.'' Historia (Wiesbaden, Germany), Heft 135. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner. Page 69.</ref>
 
Line 183 ⟶ 187:
{{refbegin|40em}}
* Eusebius of Caesarea.
** ''Historia Ecclesiastica'' (''Church History'') first seven books {{circa|300}}, eighth and ninth book c. {{circa|313}}, tenth book c. {{circa|315}}, epilogue {{circa|325}}.
*** Migne, J.P., ed. ''Eusebiou tou Pamphilou, episkopou tes en Palaistine Kaisareias ta euriskomena panta'' (in Greek). ''Patrologia Graeca'' 19–24. Paris, 1857. Online at [http://khazarzar.skeptik.net/pgm/PG_Migne/Eusebius%20Caesariensis_PG%2019-24/ Khazar Skeptik] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091228102648/http://khazarzar.skeptik.net/pgm/PG_Migne/Eusebius%20Caesariensis_PG%2019-24/ |date=2009-12-28 }} and [http://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/04z/z_0265-0339__Eusebius_Caesariensis__Historia_Ecclesiastica__GR.pdf.html Documenta Catholica Omnia]. Accessed 4 November 2009.
*** McGiffert, Arthur Cushman, trans. ''Church History''. From ''Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers'', Second Series, Vol. 1. Edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1890. Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. Online at [http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2501.htm New Advent] and [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.toc.html CCEL]. Accessed 28 September 2009.
Line 276 ⟶ 280:
* [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05617b.htm "Eusebius"] in ''New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia'' (1917)
* [http://www.tertullian.org/rpearse/eusebius/ "Eusebius of Caesarea"] at the [http://www.tertullian.org ''Tertullian Project'']
* [http://www.earlychurch.org.uk/eusebius.php Extensive bibliography] at ''EarlyChurch.org'']
* [http://www.fourthcentury.com/index.php/eusebius-chart Chronological list of Eusebius's writings]
 
Line 282 ⟶ 286:
{{s-rel|grt}}
{{s-bef|before=[[Agapius of Caesarea|Agapius]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=[[Bishop of Caesarea]]|years={{c.}} 313 – 339313–339}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Acacius of Caesarea|Acacius]]}}
{{S-end}}
Line 290 ⟶ 294:
 
[[Category:Eusebius| ]]
[[Category:4th-century writersSyrian bishops| ]]
[[Category:4th-century Greek writers| ]]
[[Category:260s births]]
[[Category:339 deaths]]
[[Category:3rd-century Romans]]
[[Category:3rd-century Greek peoplewriters]]
[[Category:4th-century Christian saints]]
[[Category:4th-century Christian theologians]]
Line 299 ⟶ 305:
[[Category:4th-century Greek philosophers]]
[[Category:4th-century Romans]]
[[Category:4th-century writers]]
[[Category:Amillennialism]]
[[Category:Bishops of Caesarea]]
Line 307 ⟶ 312:
[[Category:Historians of Christianity]]
[[Category:Historians of the Catholic Church]]
[[Category:LateWriters Antiqueof writerslate antiquity]]
[[Category:People offrom Roman Syria]]
[[Category:People of Roman Palestine]]
[[Category:Greek-language historians from the Roman Empire]]
[[Category:Year of birth uncertain]]
[[Category:Participant in the First Council of Nicaea]]
[[Category:Saints from the Holy Land]]