Eusebius: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Upper case.
→‎Doctrine: Remove overstatement of relation to Origen. Origen lost church authority late in life while Eusebius did not.
Line 136:
 
==Doctrine==
 
{{Original research section|date=December 2019}}
Eusebius is fairly unusual in his [[preterist]], or fulfilled, eschatological view. Saying "the Holy Scriptures foretell that there will be unmistakable signs of the Coming of Christ. Now there were among the Hebrews three outstanding offices of dignity, which made the nation famous, firstly the kingship, secondly that of prophet, and lastly the high priesthood. The prophecies said that the abolition and complete destruction of all these three together would be the sign of the presence of the Christ. And that the proofs that the times had come, would lie in the ceasing of the Mosaic worship, the desolation of Jerusalem and its Temple, and the subjection of the whole Jewish race to its enemies. ...The holy oracles foretold that all these changes, which had not been made in the days of the prophets of old, would take place at the coming of the Christ, which I will presently shew to have been fulfilled as never before in accordance with the predictions" (''Demonstratio Evangelica'' VIII).
 
From a [[dogma]]tic point of view, Eusebius standsis entirelyrelated uponin thehis shouldersviews ofto [[Origen]]. Like Origen, he started from the fundamental thought of the absolute sovereignty (''monarchia'') of God. God is the cause of all beings. But he is not merely a cause; in him everything good is included, from him all life originates, and he is the source of all virtue. God sent Christ into the world that it may partake of the blessings included in the essence of God. Eusebius expressly distinguishes the Son as distinct from Father as a ray is also distinct from its source the sun.{{Citation needed|date=January 2014}}
 
Eusebius held that men were sinners by their own free choice and not by the necessity of their natures. Eusebius said: