Equatorial bulge: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
(34 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Outward bulge around a planet's equator due to its rotation}}
{{for|the feature on some of [[Saturn]]'s moons|equatorial ridge}}
 
{{More citations needed|date=April 2023}}
An '''equatorial bulge''' is a difference between the [[equator]]ial and polar [[diameter]]s of a [[planet]], due to the [[centrifugal force]] exerted by the [[rotation]] about the body's axis. A rotating body tends to form an [[oblate spheroid]] rather than a [[sphere]].
 
An '''equatorial bulge''' is a difference between the [[equator]]ial and polar [[diameter]]s of a [[planet]], due to the [[centrifugal force]] exerted by the [[Rotation around a fixed axis|rotation]] about the body's axis. A rotating body tends to form an [[oblate spheroid]] rather than a [[sphere]].
[[File:Sphere-OblateSpheroidComparison.jpg|thumb|Comparison between an oblate spheroid and sphere.]]
==On Earth==
{{main|FigureEarth of the Earthradii}}
{{further|Earth ellipsoid|Figure of the Earth}}
The [[Earth]] has a rather slight equatorial bulge: it is about {{cvt|43|km|mi}} wider at the equator than pole-to-pole, a difference which is close to 1/300 of the diameter. If the Earth were scaled down to a globe with diameter of 1 meter at the equator, that difference would be only 3 millimeters. While too small to notice visually, that difference is still more than twice the largest deviations of the actual surface from the ellipsoid, including the tallest mountains and deepest oceanic trenches.
 
The planet [[Earth]] has a rather slight equatorial bulge:; itits equatorial diameter is about {{cvt|43|km|mi}} widergreater atthan theits equatorpolar than pole-to-polediameter, with a difference whichof is close toabout {{fract|1/300|298}} of the equatorial diameter. If the Earth were scaled down to a globe with an equatorial diameter of {{convert|1 meter at the equator|m|ft}}, that difference would be only {{cvt|3 millimeters|mm|in}}. While too small to notice visually, that difference is still more than twice the largest deviations of the actual surface from the ellipsoid, including the [[list of mountain peaks by prominence|tallest mountains]] and deepest [[oceanic trenchestrench]]es.
 
The[[Earth's rotation of the earth]] also affects the [[sea level]], the imaginary surface thatused isas useda [[reference frame]] from which to measure [[altitude]]s from. This surface coincides with the mean water surface level in oceans, and is extrapolated over land by taking into account the local [[gravity of Earth|gravitational potential]] and the centrifugal force.
 
The difference of the [[radius|radii]] is thus about {{cvt|21 |km|mi}}. An observer standing at sea level on either [[geographical pole|pole]], therefore, is {{cvt|21 |km|mi}} closer to Earth's center than if standing at sea level on the Equator. As a result, the highest point on Earth, measured from the center and outwards, is the peak of Mount [[Chimborazo]] in [[Ecuador]] rather than [[Mount Everest]]. But since the ocean also bulges, like Earth and [[atmosphere of Earth|its atmosphere]], Chimborazo is not as high above sea level as Everest is. Similarly the lowest point on Earth, measured from the center and outwards, is the [[Litke Deep]] in the [[Arctic Ocean]] rather than [[Challenger Deep]] in the [[Pacific Ocean]]. But since the ocean also flattens, like Earth and its atmosphere, Litke Deep is not as low below sea level as Challenger Deep is.
 
More precisely, theEarth's surface of the [[Earth]] is usually approximated by an ideal [[oblate ellipsoid]], for the purposes of defining precisely the [[latitude]] and [[longitude]] grid for [[cartography]], as well as the "center of the Earth". In the [[World Geodetic System|WGS-84]] standard [[Earth ellipsoid]], widely used for map-making and the [[GPS]] system, the[[Earth radius of the |Earth's radius]] is assumed to be {{cvt|6378.137|km|mi|comma=gaps}} atto the equatorEquator and {{cvt|6356.7523142|km|mi|comma=gaps}} center-to- either pole;, meaning a difference of {{cvt|21.3846858|km|mi|comma=gaps}} inbetween the radii andor {{cvt|42.7693716|km|mi|comma=gaps}} inbetween the diameters, and a relative [[flattening]] of 1/298.257223563. The sea level[[ocean surface]] is much closer to this standard ellipsoid than the surface[[Earth's ofcrust|solid thesurface]] solidof Earth is.
 
== The equilibrium as a balance of energies ==
{{Further|Hydrostatic equilibrium#Planetary geology}}
 
[[Image:Equatorial bulge model.png|frame|right|Fixed to the vertical rod is a spring metal band. When stationary the spring metal band is circular in shape. The top of the metal band can slide along the vertical rod.
Line 19 ⟶ 24:
When spun, the spring-metal band bulges at its equator and flattens at its poles in analogy with the Earth.]]
 
[[Gravity]] tends to contract a celestial body into a [[sphere]], the shape for which all the mass is as close to the center of gravity as possible. [[Rotation]] causes a distortion from this spherical shape; a common measure of the distortion is the [[flattening]] (sometimes called ellipticity or oblateness), which can depend on a variety of factors including the size, [[angular velocity]], [[density]], and [[Elasticity (physics)|elasticity]].
 
ToA way for one to get a feel for the type of equilibrium thatinvolved is involved,to imagine someone seated in a spinning swivel chair, withand weightsholding ina theirweight hands.in Ifeach thehand; person inif the chairindividual pulls the weights inward towards them, they[[Work are(physics)|work]] doingis workbeing done and their rotational kinetic energy increases. The increase ofin rotation rate is so strong that at the faster rotation rate the required [[centripetal force]] is larger than with the starting rotation rate.
 
Something analogous to this occurs in planet formation. Matter first coalesces into a slowly rotating disk-shaped distribution, and collisions and friction convert kinetic energy to heat, which allows the disk to self-gravitate into a very oblate spheroid.
 
As long as the proto-planet is still too oblate to be in equilibrium, the release of [[gravitational energy|gravitational potential energy]] on contraction keeps driving the increase in rotational kinetic energy. As the contraction proceeds, the rotation rate keeps going up, hence the required force for further contraction keeps going up. There is a point where the increase of rotational kinetic energy on further contraction would be larger than the release of gravitational potential energy. The contraction process can only proceed up to that point, so it halts there.
 
As long as there is no equilibrium there can be violent convection, and as long as there is violent convection friction can convert kinetic energy to heat, draining rotational kinetic energy from the system. When the equilibrium state has been reached then large scale conversion of kinetic energy to heat ceases. In that sense the equilibrium state is the lowest state of energy that can be reached.
 
The Earth's rotation rate is still slowing down, though gradually, by about two thousandths of a second per rotation every 100 years.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Hadhazy|first=Adam|title=Fact or Fiction: The Days (and Nights) Are Getting Longer|url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=earth-rotation-summer-solstice|magazine=[[Scientific American]]|accessdateaccess-date=5 December 2011}}</ref> Estimates of how fast the Earth was rotating in the past vary, because it is not known exactly how the moon was formed. Estimates of the Earth's rotation 500 million years ago are around 20 modern hours per "day".
 
The Earth's rate of rotation is slowing down mainly because of tidal interactions with the Moon and the Sun. Since the solid parts of the Earth are [[ductile]], the Earth's equatorial bulge has been decreasing in step with the decrease in the rate of rotation.
 
== DifferencesEffect inon gravitational acceleration ==
{{main|Theoretical gravity}}
 
[[ImageFile:Forces oblate spheroid2.gif|frame|right|The forces at play in the case of a planet with an equatorial bulge due to rotation.<br/>
Red arrow: gravity <br/>
Green arrow,: the [[normal force]] <br/>
Blue arrow: the resultant force <br/>
<br/>
The resultant force provides required centripetal force. Without this centripetal force frictionless objects would slide towards the equator. <br/>
<br/>
In calculations, when a coordinate system is used that is co-rotating with the Earth, the vector of the notional [[centrifugal force (rotating reference frame)|centrifugal force]] points outward, and is just as large as the vector representing the centripetal force.]]
 
Because of a planet's rotation around its own axis, the [[gravitational acceleration]] is less at the [[equator]] than at the [[geographical pole|poles]]. In the 17th century, following the invention of the [[pendulum clock]], French scientists found that clocks sent to [[French Guiana]], on the northern coast of [[South America]], ran slower than their exact counterparts in Paris. Measurements of the acceleration due to gravity at the equator must also take into account the planet's rotation. Any object that is stationary with respect to the surface of the Earth is actually following a circular trajectory, circumnavigating the Earth's axis. Pulling an object into such a circular trajectory requires a force. The acceleration that is required to circumnavigate the Earth's axis along the equator at one revolution per [[sidereal day]] is 0.0339&nbsp;m/s²<sup>2</sup>. Providing this acceleration decreases the effective gravitational acceleration. At the equatorEquator, the effective gravitational acceleration is 9.7805&nbsp;m/s<sup>2</sup>. This means that the true gravitational acceleration at the equatorEquator must be 9.8144&nbsp;m/s<sup>2</sup> (9.7805&nbsp;+&nbsp;0.0339&nbsp;=&nbsp;9.8144).
 
At the poles, the gravitational acceleration is 9.8322&nbsp;m/s<sup>2</sup>. The difference of 0.0178&nbsp;m/s<sup>2</sup> between the gravitational acceleration at the poles and the true gravitational acceleration at the equatorEquator is because objects located on the equatorEquator are about {{cvt|21 kilometers|km|mi}} further away from the [[center of mass]] of the Earth than at the poles, which corresponds to a smaller gravitational acceleration.
 
In summary, there are two contributions to the fact that the effective gravitational acceleration is less strong at the equator than at the poles. About 70 percent% of the difference is contributed by the fact that objects circumnavigate the Earth's axis, and about 30 percent% is due to the non-spherical shape of the Earth.
 
The diagram illustrates that on all latitudes the effective gravitational acceleration is decreased by the requirement of providing a centripetal force; the decreasing effect is strongest on the equatorEquator.
 
== Effect on satellite orbits ==
Line 65 ⟶ 70:
|bibcode=2011PhRvD..84l4001I
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.84.124001
|s2cid=118305813
}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal
|last1=Renzetti
|first1=G.
Line 76 ⟶ 82:
|bibcode=2013JApA...34..341R
|doi=10.1007/s12036-013-9186-4
|s2cid=120030309
}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal
|last1=Renzetti
|first1=G.
Line 87 ⟶ 94:
|bibcode=2014Ap&SS.352..493R
|doi=10.1007/s10509-014-1915-x
|s2cid=119537102
}}</ref> They depend on the orientation of the Earth's symmetry axis in the inertial space, and, in the general case, affect ''all'' the Keplerian [[orbital elements]] with the exception of the [[semimajor axis]]. If the reference ''z'' axis of the coordinate system adopted is aligned along the Earth's symmetry axis, then only the [[longitude of the ascending node]] Ω, the [[argument of pericenter]] ω and the [[mean anomaly]] ''M'' undergo secular precessions.<ref>{{cite journal
|last1=King-Hele
|first1=D. G.
Line 125 ⟶ 133:
|doi=10.1139/p2012-081
}}</ref> because the much smaller relativistic effects are qualitatively indistinguishable from the oblateness-driven disturbances.
 
 
== Formulation ==
The flattening coefficient <math>f</math> for the equilibrium configuration of a self-gravitating spheroid, composed of uniform density incompressible fluid, rotating steadily about some fixed axis, for a small amount of flattening, is approximated by:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/336k/Newton/node109.html|title=Rotational Flattening|work=utexas.edu}}</ref>
:<math display="block">f = \frac{a_e - a_p}{a} = \frac{5}{4} \frac{\omega^2 a^3}{G M} = \frac{15 \pi}{4} \frac{1}{G T^2 \rho}</math>
 
:<math>f = \frac{a_e - a_p}{a} = \frac{5}{4} \frac{\omega^2 a^3}{G M} = \frac{15 \pi}{4} \frac{1}{G T^2 \rho}</math>
 
where
:*<math>G</math> is the universal [[gravitational constant]],
:*<math>a</math> is the mean radius,
:*<math>a_e = a\, (1 + \tfrac{f}{3})</math> and <math>a_p = a\,(1 - \tfrac{2f}{3})</math> are respectively the equatorial and polar radius,{{Dubious|date=April 2023}}
:*<math>T</math> is the rotation period and <math>\omega = \tfrac{2 \pi}{T}</math> is the [[angular velocity]],
:*<math>\rho</math> is the body density and <math>M \simeq \tfrac{4}{3} \pi \rho a^3</math> is the total body mass.
 
Real flattening is smaller due to mass concentration in the center of celestrialcelestial bodies.
 
{| class="wikitable floatright"
== Other celestial bodies ==
|+ [[Giant planet]]s of the [[Solar System]]
{{see also|Reference ellipsoid#Other celestial bodies}}
 
{| class="wikitable floatright"
|+ Equatorial bulge of the Solar Systems major celestial bodies
|-
! rowspan="2" | Body
! colspan="2" | Diameter (km)
! rowspan="2" | Equatorial<br>bulge (km)
! rowspan="2" | [[Flattening]]<br>ratio
! rowspan="2" | Rotation<br>period (h)
! rowspan="2" | Density<br>(kg/m<sup>3</sup>)
! rowspan="2" | <math>f</math>
! rowspan="2" | Deviation<br>from <math>f</math>
|-
! Equatorial
! Polar
|-
| [[Earth]] || {{0}}12&#8239;756.2 || {{0}}12&#8239;713.6 || {{0|00&#8239;0}}42.6 || 1&#8239;:&#8239;299.4 || 23.936 || 5515 || 1&#8239;:&#8239;232 || −23%
|-
| [[Mars]] || {{0|00}}6&#8239;792.4 || {{0|00}}6&#8239;752.4 || {{0|00&#8239;0}}40 || 1&#8239;:&#8239;170 || 24.632 || 3933 || 1&#8239;:&#8239;175 || {{0}}+3%
|-
! !! a<sub>e</sub> [km] !! a<sub>p</sub> [km] !! f<sub>real</sub> !! T [h] !! M [10<sup>26</sup> kg] !! f<sub>formula</sub>
| [[Ceres (dwarf planet)|Ceres]] || {{0|000&#8239;}}964.3 || {{0|000&#8239;}}891.8 || {{0|000}}72.5 || 1&#8239;:&#8239;13.3 || {{0}}9.074 || 2162 || 1&#8239;:&#8239;13.1 || {{0}}−2%
|-
| [[Jupiter]] || 142&#8239;984 71,492 || 133&#8239;708 66,854 || {{0}}9&#8239;276 .066 || 1&#8239;:&#8239;15.41 || {{0}}9.9259 || 1326 18.98 || 1&#8239;:&#8239;90.59 || −38%104
|-
| [[Saturn]] || 120&#8239;536 60,268 || 108&#8239;728 54,364|| 11&#8239;808 0.108 || 1&#8239;:&#8239;10.216 || 105.56 68 || {{0}}687 || 1&#8239;:&#8239;5.62 || −45%178
|-
| [[Uranus]] || {{0}}51&#8239;118 25,559 || {{0}}49&#8239;946 24,973 || {{0}}1&#8239;172 || 1&#8239;:&#8239;43.62023 || 17.24 2 || 1270 0.87 || 1&#8239;:&#8239;270.71 || −36%036
|-
| [[Neptune]] || {{0}}49&#8239;528 24,764 || {{0}}48&#8239;682 24,341 || {{0|00&#8239;}}846 || 1&#8239;:&#8239;58.54017 || 16.11 || 1638 1 || 1&#8239;:&#8239;31.2202 || −47%0.032
|}
 
== See also ==
Generally any celestial body that is rotating (and that is sufficiently massive to draw itself into spherical or near spherical shape) will have an equatorial bulge matching its rotation rate. With 11808&nbsp;km [[Saturn]] is the planet with the largest equatorial bulge in our Solar System.
*{{slink|Astronomical object#Shape}}
Equatorial bulges should not be confused with [[equatorial ridge|equatorial ridges]]. Equatorial ridges are a feature of at least four of Saturn's moons: the large moon [[Iapetus (moon)|Iapetus]] and the tiny moons [[Atlas (moon)|Atlas]], [[Pan (moon)|Pan]], and [[Daphnis (moon)|Daphnis]]. These ridges closely follow the moons' equators. The ridges appear to be unique to the Saturnian system, but it is uncertain whether the occurrences are related or a coincidence. The first three were discovered by the [[Cassini-Huygens|''Cassini'' probe]] in 2005; the Daphnean ridge was discovered in 2017. The ridge on Iapetus is nearly 20&nbsp;km wide, 13&nbsp;km high and 1300&nbsp;km long. The ridge on Atlas is proportionally even more remarkable given the moon's much smaller size, giving it a disk-like shape. Images of Pan show a structure similar to that of Atlas, while the one on Daphnis is less pronounced.
*[[Clairaut's theorem (gravity)]]
*[[Earth's gravity]]
*[[Planetary flattening]]
 
== References ==