Federalism in the United States: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
MOS:ORDER and add relevant sidebar template
m consistent writing style throughout the article
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
(15 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 8:
{{US Constitution article series}}
{{United States constitutional law}}
{{Conservatism US|principles}}
 
'''Federalism inIn the United States''', federalism is the constitutional division of power between [[U.S. state]] governments and the [[federal government of the United States]]. Since the founding of the country, and particularly with the end of the [[American Civil War]], power shifted away from the states and toward the national government. The progression of federalism includes [[dual federalism|dual]], [[Cooperative federalism|cooperative]], and [[newNew federalismFederalism]].
 
== Early federalism ==
[[Federalism]] is a form of political organization that seeks to distinguish states and unites them, assigning different types of decision-making power at different levels to allow a degree of political independence in an overarching structure.<ref name=":1">{{Citation|last=Follesdal|first=Andreas|title=Federalism|date=2018|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/federalism/|encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|editor-last=Zalta|editor-first=Edward N.|edition=Summer 2018|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|access-date=2021-02-06}}</ref> Federalism was a political solution to the problems with the [[Articles of Confederation]] which gave little practical authority to the federal[[Congress of the Confederation|confederal government]]. For example, the Articles allowed the [[Continental Congress]] the power to sign treaties and declare war, but it could not raise taxes to pay for an army and all major decisions required a unanimous vote.<ref name=":0">{{harvnb|Gerston|2007|pp=24–25}}</ref>
 
The movement for federalism was greatly strengthened by the reaction to [[Shays' Rebellion]] of 1786–1787, which was an armed uprising of [[Yeoman#United States|yeoman farmers]] in western [[Massachusetts]]. The rebellion was fueled by a poor economy that was created, in part, by the inability of the federalconfederal government to deal effectively with the debt from the [[American Revolutionary War]]. Moreover, the federalconfederal government had proven incapable of raising an army to quell the rebellion, so that Massachusetts had been forced to raise its own.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Shays' Rebellion|url=https://www.history.com/topics/early-us/shays-rebellion|access-date=2021-02-06|website=HISTORY|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last1=Franklin|first1=Benjamin|last2=Jefferson|first2=Thomas|last3=Jay|first3=John|last4=Adams|first4=Abigail|last5=Madison|first5=James|last6=Smith|first6=John Rubens|last7=Washington|first7=George|last8=Birch|first8=William|last9=Monroe|first9=James|date=2008-04-12|title=Road to the Constitution - Creating the United States {{!}} Exhibitions - Library of Congress|url=https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/creating-the-united-states/road-to-the-constitution.html|access-date=2021-02-06|website=www.loc.gov}}</ref>
 
On May 15, 1787, fifty-five delegates met at what would be known as the [[Constitutional Convention (United States)|Constitutional Convention]] in the [[Philadelphia]] State House. There, the delegates debated the structure, provisions, and limitations of [[Federalism]] in what would be the [[Constitution of the United States]]. This was a clear development in federal thought.<ref name=":1" />
Line 22:
Madison later wrote in [[Federalist No. 10]] on his support for a federal government, "the smaller the number of individuals composing a majority, and the smaller the compass within which they are placed, the more easily will they concert and execute their plans of oppression. Extend the sphere, and you take in a greater variety of parties and interests; you make it less probable that a majority of the whole will have a common motive to invade the rights of other citizens".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.congress.gov/resources/display/content/The+Federalist+Papers#TheFederalistPapers-10 |title=Full Text of The Federalist Papers |publisher=Library of Congress |access-date=March 25, 2022}}</ref>
 
The convention had begun altering its original plan but then decided to abandon continued efforts of emendation, and officially set about constructing a new [[Constitution of the United States]]. Because [[George Washington]] lent his prestige to the Constitution and because of the ingenuity and organizational skills of its proponents, the Constitution was ratified in all states. The outgoing [[Congress of the Confederation]] scheduled elections for the new government, and set March 4, 1789 as the date that the new government would take power. Once the convention concluded and released the Constitution for public consumption, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist movements soon began publicizing their disagreeing beliefs in local newspapers and segments.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Roche |first1=John P. |title=The Founding Fathers: A Reform Caucus in Action |journal=The American Political Science Review |date=1961 |volume=55 |issue=4 |page=814 |doi=10.2307/1952528 |jstor=1952528 |s2cid=145725823 |issn=0003-0554}}</ref>
 
The most forceful defense of the new Constitution was ''[[The Federalist Papers]]'', a compilation of 85 anonymous essays published in New York City to convince the people of the state to vote for ratification. These articles, written by [[Alexander Hamilton]] and [[James Madison]], with some contributed by [[John Jay]], examined the benefits of the new, proposed Constitution, and analyzed the political theory and function behind the various articles of the Constitution. ''The Federalist Papers'' remain one of the most important sets of documents in American history and political science.<ref name="Citycyclopedia">Jackson, Kenneth T. ''The Encyclopedia of New York City'': The New York Historical Society; Yale University Press; 1995. p. 194.</ref>
Line 29:
 
The Anti-Federalist critique soon centered on the absence of a [[bill of rights]], which Federalists in the ratifying conventions promised to provide. Washington and Madison had personally pledged to consider amendments, realizing that they would be necessary to reduce pressure for a second constitutional convention that might drastically alter and weaken the new federal government. Madison proposed amendments that gave more rights to individuals than to states, which led to criticisms of diversion by Anti-Federalists.<ref name=":2" />
 
The outgoing [[Congress of the Confederation]] scheduled elections for the new government, and set March 4, 1789 as the date that the new government would take power.
 
In 1789, Congress submitted twelve articles of amendment to the states. Ten of these articles, written by congressional committees, achieved passage on December 15, 1791 and became the [[United States Bill of Rights]].<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|last=|first=|last2=|first2=|last3=|first3=|last4=|first4=|date=|title=Demand for a Bill of Rights - Creating the United States {{!}} Exhibitions - Library of Congress|url=https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/creating-the-united-states/demand-for-a-bill-of-rights.html|access-date=2021-01-11|website=www.loc.gov|publisher=Library of Congress}}</ref> The [[Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Tenth Amendment]] set the guidelines for federalism in the United States.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Tenth Amendment|url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/tenth_amendment|access-date=2021-01-11|website=LII / Legal Information Institute|language=en}}</ref>
Line 60 ⟶ 62:
As early as 1913, there was talk of regulating stock exchanges, and the Capital Issues Committee formed to control access to credit during World War I recommended federal regulation of all stock issues and exchanges shortly before it ceased operating in 1921. With the [[Morrill Land-Grant Acts]] Congress used land sale revenues to make grants to the states for colleges during the Civil War on the theory that land sale revenues could be devoted to subjects beyond those listed in [[Article One of the United States Constitution#Section 8: Powers of Congress|Article I, Section 8]] of the Constitution. On several occasions during the 1880s, one house of Congress or the other passed bills providing land sale revenues to the states for the purpose of aiding primary schools. During the first years of the twentieth century, the endeavors funded with federal grants multiplied, and Congress began using general revenues to fund them—thus utilizing the [[general welfare clause]]'s broad spending power, even though it had been discredited for almost a century (Hamilton's view that a broad spending power could be derived from the clause had been all but abandoned by 1840).
 
During Herbert Hoover's administration, grants went to the states for the purpose of funding poor relief. The 1920s saw Washington expand its role in domestic law enforcement. Disaster relief for areas affected by floods or crop failures dated from 1874, and these appropriations began to multiply during the administration of [[Woodrow Wilson]] (1913–21). By 1933, the precedents necessary for the federal government to exercise broad regulatory power over all economic activity and spend for any purpose it saw fit were almost all in place. Virtually all that remained was for the will to be mustered in Congress and for the Supreme Court to acquiesce.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Zavodnyik |first=Peter |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AhhlcAAACAAJ&q=zavodnyik |title=The Rise of the Federal Colossus: The Growth of Federal Power from Lincoln to F.D.R. |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2011 |isbn=978-0-313-39293-1 |location=Santa Barbara, CA |pages=21–30, 186–93, 213–19, 291–93, 313–27, 363–64, 380–93, 416–19 }}{{Dead link|date=April 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
 
{{col-begin}}
Line 110 ⟶ 112:
The national government was forced to cooperate with all levels of government to implement the New Deal policies; local government earned an equal standing with the other layers, as the federal government relied on [[political machine]]s at a city level to bypass [[State legislature (United States)|state legislatures]]. The formerly distinct division of responsibilities between state and national government had been described as a "layer cake," but, with the lines of duty blurred, cooperative federalism was likened to a "marble cake" or a "picket fence." In cooperative federalism, federal funds are distributed through [[grants in aid]] or [[categorical grant]]s which gave the federal government more control over the use of the money.
 
== New federalismFederalism ==
{{main|New Federalism}}
{{norefs|section|date=November 2023}}
Another movement calling itself "New Federalism" appeared in the late 20th century and early 21st century. Many of the ideas of New Federalism originated with [[Richard Nixon]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Katz|first=Bruce|date=2014-08-11|title=Nixon's New Federalism 45 Years Later|url=https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2014/08/11/nixons-new-federalism-45-years-later/|access-date=2021-08-29|website=Brookings|language=en-US}}</ref> New Federalism, which is characterized by a gradual return of power to the states, was initiated by President [[Ronald Reagan]] (1981–89) with his "devolution revolution" in the early 1980s and lasted until 2001. Previously, the federal government had granted money to the states categorically, limiting the states to use this funding for specific programs. Reagan's administration, however, introduced a practice of giving block grants, freeing state governments to spend the money at their own discretion. An example and the first case of this was ''[[Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority]]'' (SAMTA) (1985). Garcia was a worker for SAMTA and appealed that because SAMTA received federal money, that they had to abide by federal labor regulations. SAMTA argued that they did not because the money received was to be used at their own discretion and did not need to abide by federal statutes because they are locally operated and make decisions about the transit system. This gave more autonomy and power to the states by allowing them to use more discretion, not having to abide by federal regulations.
 
Under New Federalism, the question that is asked is may the federal government constitutionally command the states to carry out federal policy? For this, the courts use the anti-commandeering principle. "The anti-commandeering doctrine says that the federal government cannot require states or state officials to adopt or enforce federal law." This became the principle by ''[[New York v. United States]]'' (1992). In this case, New York sued the federal government, questioning the authority of congressCongress to regulate waste management. The courts ruled that it violated the 10th amendment because congress made the state of New York commandeer to federal regulations when states already take legal ownership and liability for waste treatment. Establishing this principle, giving states more autonomy on issues that fall under their discretion.
 
A modern-day application of this rule can be found in ''[[Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association]]'' (2018). New Jersey’s governor attacked the federal government's prohibition on sports gambling. The courts again used the anti-commandeering principle, allowing states to regulate sports gambling at their discretion. This is starting to become a trend because now states are passing laws on issues that are often federally prohibited or heavily regulated by Congress under the commerce clause, as in the areas of medical marijuana (''[[Gonzales v. Raich]]''), [[partial-birth abortion]] (''[[Gonzales v. Carhart]]''), gun possession (''[[United States v. Lopez]]''), federal police powers (''[[United States v. Morrison]]'', which struck down portions of the [[Violence Against Women Act]]), or agriculture (''[[Wickard v. Filburn]]'').
Line 142 ⟶ 145:
 
==Notes==
{{further|Bibliography of the United States Constitution}}
{{Reflist}}
 
Line 151 ⟶ 155:
* {{Citation |last=Taylor |first=Jeff |author-link=Jeff Taylor (politician) |title=Politics on a Human Scale: The American Tradition of Decentralism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uVwrAQAAQBAJ |year=2013 |place=Lanham, Maryland |publisher=[[Lexington Books]] |isbn=978-0-7391-8674-9 }}
* [[U.S. Constitution]]
* {{Citation |last=Zavodnyik |first=Peter |title=The Rise of the Federal Colossus: The Growth of Federal Power from Lincoln to F.D.R. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AhhlcAAACAAJ&q=zavodnyik |year=2011 |place=Santa Barbara, California |publisher=ABC-CLIO }}{{Dead link|date=April 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
* {{Citation |last=Phelps |first=Richard P. |title=The Malfunction of US Education Policy: Elite Misinformation, Disinformation, and Selfishness |url=https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781475869941/The-Malfunction-of-US-Education-Policy-Elite-Misinformation-Disinformation-and-Selfishness |year=2023 |place=Lanham, Maryland |publisher=Rowman and Littlefield |isbn=978-1-4758-6994-1 }}
 
 
{{United States topics}}