Home School Legal Defense Association: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Reverted 1 edit by Abcdefgggfedcba (talk) to last revision by Crossroads
Fill in bare ref
Line 102:
 
'''In the Matter of Stumbo'''
* The North Carolina Supreme Court unanimously affirmed that social services may not begin an investigation based solely on an anonymous tip. Furthermore, it reaffirmed that social service workers are bound, as government employees, to the Fourth Amendment assurances against unreasonable search and seizure.<ref>{{cite webcourt |litigants=In re Stumbo |vol=582 |reporter=S.E.2d |opinion= 255 |court=N.C. |date=2003 |url=httphttps://wwwcasetext.hslda.orgcom/docscase/link.asp?URL%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.aoc.state.nc.us%2Fwww%2Fpublic%2Fsc%2Fopinions%2F2003%2F321in-01re-1.htm |accessstumbo-date=April 2, 2016 }}</ref>
 
'''In Re Gauthier Children: Petition to Compel Cooperation with Child Abuse Investigation'''