Jacques Lacan: Difference between revisions

In ''Les Freudiens hérétiques'', the 8th tome of his work ''Contre-histoire de la philosophie'' (''Anti-History of Philosophy''),<ref name=anti>{{cite book |last= Onfray |first=Michel|author-link=Michel Onfray |date=2013 |title=Les Freudiens hérétiques : Contre-histoire de la philosophie|language=French|trans-title=The heretic Freudians: Anti-History of Philosophy|volume= 8th |publisher=[[Éditions Grasset]] |isbn=978-2246802686}}</ref> [[Michel Onfray]] determined thatdescribes Lacan's [[best seller|best-selling]] ''[[Écrits]]'' (''Writings'')<ref name=ecrits>{{cite book |last= Lacan |first=Jacques |author-link=Jacques Lacan|date=2007 |title=Écrits|language=English|trans-title=Writings|translator-first1= Bruce |translator-link=Bruce Fink (psychoanalyst) |translator-last1=Fink|publisher=[[W. W. Norton]] |isbn= ‎ 978-0393329254}}</ref> isas "illegible"<ref name=anti/>{{rp|49}}. Lacan,According into his workOnfray, Onfray asserts,Lacan engages in constant [[word play]]s and, has a taste for the [[formulaic]], while he alsoand deploys "[[Incantation|incantatory]] [[glossolalia]]" and unnecessary [[neologism]]s. He goes as far as stating thatcalls Lacan, whom he too calls a "charlatan," isand a "[[dandy]] figure" who "sinks into [[autism]]," eventually becoming [[senile]].<ref name=anti/>{{rp|49-50}}