Mexican Americans: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Line 29:
{{main|History of Mexican Americans}}
[[File:Southwestern_Chillis_and_Skull.jpg|thumb|right|upright=0.9|Symbols of the Southwest: a string of chili peppers (a [[ristra]]) and a bleached white cow's skull hang in a market near [[Santa Fe, New Mexico|Santa Fe]].]]
In 1900, there were slightly more than 500,000 [[Hispanic and Latino Americans|LatinosHispanics]] of Mexican descent living in New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, California and Texas.<ref>{{cite web |author=Population Reference Bureau |url=http://www.prb.org/Articles/2004/LatinosandtheChangingFaceofAmerica.aspx |title=Latinos and the Changing Face of America – Population Reference Bureau |publisher=Prb.org |date=2013-11-13 |access-date=2014-01-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120519161150/http://www.prb.org/Articles/2004/LatinosandtheChangingFaceofAmerica.aspx |archive-date=2012-05-19 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Most were [[Mestizo]] Mexican Americans of Spanish and Indigenous descent, Spanish settlers, other Hispanicized European settlers who settled in the Southwest during Spanish colonial times, as well as local and Mexican Amerindians.
 
New Mexico [[Hispanos of New Mexico|Hispanos]] were a notably large majority of the southwest US population. The vast majority of Hispanos are genetically Mestizo with varying degrees of Spanish ancestry, as well as ancestry from [[Puebloans|Pueblos]] and various North American Indigenous tribes. [[New Mexico]] was far more populated since the 16th century in comparison to Texas & California.
Line 122:
{{bar percent|'''Total'''|Blue|100}}
|caption=
}} This identification as "some other race" reflects activism among Mexican Americans as claiming a cultural status and working for their rights in the United States, as well as the separation due to different language and culture. LatinosHispanics are not a racial classification, however, but an ethnic group.
 
The barrier that the language places on people who are immigrating from Mexico is difficult due to the importance that is placed around knowing how to speak English. The lack of support from surrounding people places an even more difficult strain given that there is not much remorse or yet very little patience that comes from those who these Mexican immigrants may find themselves seeking aid from.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Lievano |first1=Wilson |title=The Impact of Language Barriers for Latinos Across America |url=https://www.usnews.com/news/news/photos/articles/2023-09-15/the-impact-of-language-barriers-for-latinos-across-america |website=usnews.com |publisher=usnews |access-date=December 11, 2023}}</ref>
Line 152:
{{cite web| url = http://www.genealogybranches.com/1930census.html| title = US Population in the 1930 Census by Race| year= 2002| access-date = December 7, 2006}}</ref>
* In the 1940 census, due to widespread protests by the Mexican American community following the 1930 changes, Mexican Americans were re-classified as ''White''. Instructions for enumerators were: "Mexicans – Report 'White' (W) for Mexicans unless they are definitely of Indigenous or other non-white race." During the same census, however, the bureau began to track the ''White population of Spanish mother tongue''. This practice continued through the 1960 census.<ref name="historical census"/> The 1960 census also used the title "Spanish-surnamed American" in their reporting data of Mexican Americans; this category also covered Cuban Americans, Puerto Ricans and others under the same category.
* From 1970 to 1980, there was a dramatic increase in the number of people who identified as "of Other Race" in the census, reflecting the addition of a question on 'Latino origin' to the 100-percent questionnaire, an increased propensity for Latinos to identify as other than White as they agitated for civil rights, and a change in editing procedures to accept reports of "Other race" for respondents who wrote in ethnic LatinoHispanic entries, such as Mexican, Cuban, or Puerto Rican. In 1970, such responses in the Other race category were reclassified and tabulated as white. During this census, the bureau attempted to identify all ''LatinosHispanics'' by use of the following criteria in sampled sets:<ref name="historical census"/>
** Spanish speakers and persons belonging to a household where the head of household was a Spanish speaker
** persons with Spanish heritage by birth location or surname
Line 185:
 
==Demographics==
[[File:Janet_Murguía_NCLR_President_and_CEO.jpg|thumb|right|200px|[[Janet Murguía]] is president of [[UnidosUS]], the United States' largest LatinoHispanic nonprofit advocacy organization.]]
Mexican Americans are concentrated in California (34%), Texas (26%) and Arizona (5%).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.pewresearch.org/hispanic/fact-sheet/us-hispanics-facts-on-mexican-origin-latinos/|title=Facts on Hispanics of Mexican origin in the United States, 2021|first1=Mohamad|last1=Moslimani|first2=Luis|last2=Noe-Bustamante|first3=Sono|last3=Shah|accessdate=4 December 2023}}</ref>
 
Line 284:
During World War II, more than 300,000 Mexican Americans served in the US armed forces.<ref name="autogenerated8" /> Mexican Americans were generally integrated into regular military units; however, many Mexican–American War veterans were discriminated against and even denied medical services by the [[United States Department of Veterans Affairs]] when they arrived home.<ref name="autogenerated1" /> In 1948, war veteran [[Hector P. Garcia]] founded the [[American GI Forum]] to address the concerns of Mexican American veterans who were being discriminated against. The AGIF's first campaign was on the behalf of [[Felix Longoria]], a Mexican American private who was killed in the Philippines while in the line of duty. Upon the return of his body to his hometown of [[Three Rivers, Texas]], he was denied funeral services because of his nationality.
 
The [[Zoot Suit Riots]] took place from June 3–8, 1943, in Los Angeles involving white American servicemen stationed in Southern California and young Latino and Mexican American city residents.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/zoot-suit-riots|title=Zoot Suits Riots|website=History.comdate=December 14, 2023 |date=9 August 2023 }}</ref> It was one of the dozen wartime industrial cities that suffered race-related riots in the summer of 1943. White servicemen and white [[Angelenos]] attacked and stripped children, teenagers, and youths who wore [[zoot suit]]s. While most of the violence was directed toward Mexican American youth, [[African Americans|African American]] and [[Filipino Americans|Filipino American]] youths who were wearing zoot suits were also attacked.<ref>{{cite book | last=Peiss | first=Kathy | year=2011 | page=33 | title=Zoot Suit | publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press | isbn=
9780812223033 | quote=Over the next few days, crowds of white civilians joined in the rampage, targeting mainly Mexican American youths but also some African Americans and Filipinos.}}</ref> The defiance of zoot suiters became inspirational for [[Chicano]]s during the [[Chicano Movement]] that worked to embrace a Chicano identity and worldview that combated structural [[Racism in the United States|racism]].<ref>{{Cite book|last=Sandoval|first=Denise M.|title=Black and Brown in Los Angeles: Beyond Conflict and Coalition|publisher=[[University of California Press]]|location=Berkeley, California|year=2013|isbn=9780520956872|editor-last=Kun|editor-first=Josh|pages=197|chapter=The Politics of Low and Slow/Bajito y Suavecito: Black and Chicano Lowriders in Los Angeles, from the 1960s through the 1970s|editor-last2=Pulido|editor-first2=Laura}}</ref>
 
Line 292:
In 1971, U.S. president [[Richard Nixon]] is recorded exhibiting prejudice toward Mexican Americans and African Americans. Referring to Latinos he states, "At the present time they steal, they're dishonest, but they do have some concept of family life. They don't live like a bunch of dogs, which the Negroes do live like."<ref>{{cite news |title=Nixon On Tape Expounds On Welfare And Homosexuality |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1999-11-07-9911070165-story.html |access-date=December 14, 2023 |work=Chicago Tribune}}</ref>
 
In 2006, ''Time'' magazine reported that the number of hate groups in the United States increased by 33% since 2000, with illegal immigration being used as a foundation for recruitment.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1198895,00.html | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060616064019/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1198895,00.html | url-status=dead | archive-date=June 16, 2006 | magazine=Time | title=How Immigration is Rousing the Zealots | date=May 29, 2006 | access-date=May 12, 2010 | first=Jeffrey | last=Ressner}}</ref> According to the 2011 Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Hate Crimes Statistics Report, 56.9% of the 939 victims of crimes motivated by a bias toward the victims' ethnicity or national origin were directed at Latinos.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2011/narratives/victims|title=Victims|website=Fbi.gov|access-date=7 October 2017}}</ref> In California, the state with the largest Mexican American population, the number of hate crimes committed against Latinos almost doubled from 2003 to 2007.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.democracynow.org/2007/12/5/fbi_statistics_show_anti_latino_hate |title=FBI Statistics Show Anti-Latino Hate Crimes on the Rise |publisher=Democracy Now! |access-date=2014-01-06}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://ccsre.stanford.edu/reports/exec_summary5.pdf |title=Latino Communities of the Central Valley: Population, Families, and Households|access-date=2008-03-01 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080216020854/http://ccsre.stanford.edu/reports/exec_summary5.pdf |archive-date=2008-02-16 }}</ref> In 2011, hate crimes against LatinosHispanics declined 31% in the United States and 43% in California.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fronterasdesk.org/news/2012/dec/17/report-shows-anti-latino-hate-crimes-down/|title=Report Shows Anti-Latino Hate Crimes Down 31 Percent|website=Fronterasdesk.org|access-date=7 October 2017|archive-date=29 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170629211538/http://www.fronterasdesk.org/news/2012/dec/17/report-shows-anti-latino-hate-crimes-down/|url-status=dead}}</ref> The [[2019 El Paso shooting]] which resulted in 23 deaths, was a result of the gunman's racist attitude towards Mexican Americans and Latino immigrants in general.
 
In 2015, future president [[Donald Trump]] offended Mexican Americans by stating "They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people." He built the [[Trump wall]] to prevent undocumented Mexican immigrants from entering the United States.<ref>{{Cite magazine|url=https://time.com/4473972/donald-trump-mexico-meeting-insult/|title=Here Are All the Times Donald Trump Insulted Mexico|first=Katie|last=Reilly|date=31 August 2016|magazine=Time|accessdate=4 December 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=18BEEAAAQBAJ&q=donald+trump+%22mexican+americans%22+discrimination|title=Trumpism, Mexican America, and the Struggle for Latinx Citizenship|first1=Phillip B.|last1=Gonzales|first2=Renato|last2=Rosaldo|first3=Mary Louise|last3=Pratt|date=15 October 2021|publisher=University of New Mexico Press|isbn=9780826362858 |accessdate=4 December 2023|via=Google Books}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/think/amp/ncna952011|title=Trump's border wall was never just about security. It's meant to remind all Latinos that we're unwelcome.|website=[[NBC News]] |date=28 December 2018 }}</ref>
Line 306:
 
[[File:CornmealProducts.jpg|left|thumb|[[Mexican food]] has become part of the mainstream American market, just as [[Italian food]] did decades before and assimilated to the American market like [[Tex-Mex]].]]
According to James P. Smith, the children and grandchildren of LatinoHispanic immigrants tend to lessen educational and income gaps with White American. Immigrant Latino men earn about half of what whites make, while second generation US-born LatinosHispanics make about 78 percent of the salaries of their white counterparts and by the third generation US-born Latinos make on average identical wages to their US-born white counterparts.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4188/is_20060618/ai_n16490113 | work=Deseret News (Salt Lake City) | title=Assimilation of immigrants is not a problem in the U.S | first=Tyler | last=Cowen | date=June 18, 2006}}</ref> However, the number of [[Mexican American professionals]] have been growing in size since 2010.<ref>{{cite web|title=Mexican American Proarchive|url=http://mexican-american-proarchive.com/2014/12/slow-and-steady-progress-for-mexican-american-professionals-the-results-of-the-american-surveys-for-the-years-2010-2012-show-positive-results/|website=Mexican American Proarchive|date=2014-12-09}}</ref> According to Gutiérrez, Ramón throughout the 1980s, single Mexican women have made up an important portion of this migration, they are representing up to 40% of the total immigrant movement. Mexican women are mostly employed in service-related jobs such as service workers, housekeepers, and nannies, with a smaller involvement in agricultural labor. While Mexicans who have strong academic skills, have been granted with legal status in the United States, and their percentage is less compared to the infusion of unskilled immigrants.<ref>{{Citation |last=Gutiérrez |first=Ramón A. |title=Mexican Immigration to the United States |date=2019-07-29 |url=https://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-146 |encyclopedia=Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History |access-date=2023-12-06 |language=en |doi=10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.013.146 |isbn=978-0-19-932917-5}}</ref>
 
Huntington (2005) argues that the sheer number, concentration, linguistic homogeneity, and other characteristics of Latin American immigrants will erode the dominance of English as a nationally unifying language, weaken the country's dominant cultural values, and promote ethnic allegiances over a primary identification as an American. Testing these hypotheses with data from the US Census and national and Los Angeles opinion surveys, Citrin et al. (2007) show that Latinos generally acquire English and lose Spanish rapidly beginning with the second generation, and appear to be no more or less religious or committed to the work ethic than native-born non-Mexican American whites. However, the children and grandchildren of Mexican immigrants were able to make close ties with their extended families in Mexico, since United States shares a 2,000 mile border with Mexico. Many had the opportunity to visit Mexico on a relatively frequent basis. As a result, many Mexicans were able to maintain a strong Mexican culture, language, and relationship with others.<ref>{{cite book|last=LeeAnne|first=Gelletly|title=Mexican Immigration|publisher=Mason Crest|location=Philadelphia}}</ref>
 
South et al. (2005) examine LatinoHispanic spatial assimilation and inter-neighborhood [[geographic mobility]]. Their longitudinal analysis of seven hundred Mexican, Puerto Rican, and Cuban immigrants followed from 1990 to 1995 finds broad support for hypotheses derived from the classical account of assimilation into American society. High income, English-language use, and embeddedness in American social contexts increased Latin American immigrants' geographic mobility into multi-ethnic neighborhoods. US citizenship and years spent in the United States were positively associated with geographic mobility into different neighborhoods while co-ethnic contact and prior experiences of ethnic discrimination decreased the likelihood that Latino immigrants would move from their original neighborhoods and into non-Latino white census tracts.<ref>South, Scott J.; Crowder, Kyle; and Chavez, Erick. "Geographic Mobility and Spatial Assimilation among US Latino Immigrants." ''International Migration Review'' 2005 39(3): 577–607. {{ISSN|0197-9183}}</ref>
{{clear}}
 
Line 318:
According to 2000 census data, US-born ethnic Mexicans have a high degree of [[Interracial marriage in the United States|intermarriage]] with [[non-Hispanic whites|non-Latino whites]]. Based on a sample size of 38,911 US-born Mexican husbands and 43,527 US-born Mexican wives:<ref name="Borjas1">{{cite book |last1=Borjas |first1=George J. |title=Mexican Immigration to the United States |date=2007 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=978-0-226-06668-4 |page=244 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_iONl31AMQYC&pg=PA244 }}</ref>
* 50.6% of US-born Mexican men and 45.3% of US-born Mexican women were married to US-born Mexicans;<ref name=Borjas1 />
* 26.7% of US-born Mexican men and 28.1% of US-born Mexican women were married to non-LatinoHispanic whites; and<ref name=Borjas1 />
* 13.6% of US-born Mexican men and 17.4% of US-born Mexican women were married to Mexico-born Mexicans.<ref name=Borjas1 />
In addition, based on 2000 data, there is a significant amount of ethnic absorption of ethnic Mexicans into the mainstream population with 16% of the children of mixed marriages not being identified in the census as Mexican.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=_iONl31AMQYC&pg=PA244 ''Mexican Immigration to the United States'' edited by George J. Borjas] page 252 | retrieved March 20, 2013</ref>
 
A study done by the National Research Council (US) Panel on LatinosHispanics in the United States published in 2006 looked at not only marriages, but also non-marriage unions. It found that since at least 1980, marriage for females across all LatinoHispanic ethnic groups, including Mexican Americans, has been in a steady decline.<ref name="Landale1">Nancy S. Landale, R. Salvador Olopesa, and Christina Bradatan. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK19902/ Hispanic Families in the United States: Family Structure and Process in an Era of Family change].</ref> In addition, the percentage of births to unmarried mothers increased for females of Mexican descent from 20.3% in 1980 to 40.8% in 2000, more than doubling in that time frame.<ref name=Landale1 /> The study also found that for females of all LatinoHispanic ethnicities, including Mexican origin, "considerably fewer births to unmarried Latino mothers involve partnerships with non-Latino white males than is the case for married Latino mothers. Second, births outside marriage are more likely to involve a non-Latino black father than births within marriage."<ref name=Landale1 /> Additionally, "Unions among partners from different Latino origins or between Latinos and non-Latino blacks are considerably more evident in cohabitation and parenthood than they are in marriage. In particular, unions between Latinos and non-Latino blacks are prominent in parenthood, especially non-marital births."<ref name=Landale1 /> Furthermore, for 29.7% of unmarried births to native-born females of Mexican origin and 40% of unmarried births to females of "Other Latino" origin, which may include Mexican American, information on the father's ethnicity was missing.<ref name=Landale1 /> The study was supported by the US Census Bureau, amongst other sources.<ref name=Landale1 />
 
=== Double-Marginalization ===
Line 329:
==Segregation issues==
===Housing market practices===
Studies have shown that the segregation among Mexican Americans and Mexican immigrants seems to be declining. One study from 1984 found that Mexican American applicants were offered the same housing terms and conditions as non-LatinoHispanic white Americans. They were asked to provide the same information (regarding employment, income, credit checks, etc.) and asked to meet the same general qualifications of their non-LatinoHispanic white peers.<ref name="autogenerated7">James, Franklin J., and Eileen A. Tynan. Minorities in the Sunbelt. New Jersey: The State University of New Jersey, 1984.</ref> In this same study, it was found that Mexican Americans were more likely than non-LatinoHispanic white Americans to be asked to pay a security deposit or application fee<ref name="autogenerated7" /> and Mexican American applicants were also more likely to be placed onto a waiting list than non-Latino white applicants.<ref name="autogenerated7" />
 
===Battle of Chavez Ravine===
Line 335:
The '''[[Battle of Chavez Ravine]]''' has several meanings, but often refers to controversy surrounding government acquisition of land largely owned by Mexican Americans in [[Los Angeles]]' [[Chavez Ravine]] over approximately ten years (1951–1961). The eventual result was the removal of the entire population of Chavez Ravine from land on which Dodger Stadium was later constructed.<ref name="Shatkin-2017">{{cite web|url=https://www.scpr.org/news/2017/10/31/77135/remembering-dodger-stadium-when-it-was-chavez-ravi/|title=What Dodger Stadium looked like when it was Chavez Ravine|last=Radio|first=Southern California Public|date=2017-10-31|website=Southern California Public Radio|access-date=2019-10-05}}</ref> The great majority of the Chavez Ravine land was acquired to make way for proposed public housing. The public housing plan that had been advanced as politically "progressive" and had resulted in the removal of the Mexican American landowners of Chavez Ravine, was abandoned after passage of a public referendum prohibiting the original housing proposal and election of a conservative Los Angeles mayor opposed to public housing. Years later, the land acquired by the government in Chavez Ravine was dedicated by the city of Los Angeles as the site of what is now [[Dodger Stadium]].<ref name="Shatkin-2017" />
 
===LatinoHispanic segregation versus Black segregation===
[[File:East LA Interchange map.svg|thumb|right|alt=Map of East LA Interchange|Viramontes' childhood neighborhood was divided by the East LA interchange in the early 1960s. The novel ''[[Their Dogs Came with Them]]'' focuses on the freeway construction and difficult conditions for the Mexican Americans living in this area at the time.]]
 
When comparing the contemporary segregation of Mexican Americans to that of Black Americans, some scholars claim that "LatinoHispanic segregation is less severe and fundamentally different from Black residential segregation." suggesting that the segregation faced by Latinos is more likely to be due to factors such as lower socioeconomic status and immigration while the segregation of African Americans is more likely to be due to larger issues of the history of [[racism in the United States|racism in the US]].<ref name="autogenerated9">Martin, Michael E. Residential Segregation Patterns of Latinos in the United States, 1991–2000. New York: Routledge, 2007.</ref>
 
Legally, Mexican Americans could vote and hold elected office, however, it was not until the creation of organizations such as the League of United Latin America Citizens and the G.I. Forum that Mexican Americans began to achieve political influence. [[Edward R. Roybal|Edward Roybal's]] election to the Los Angeles City Council in 1949 and then to Congress in 1962 also represented this rising Mexican American political power.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://history.house.gov/People/Listing/R/ROYBAL,-Edward-R--(R000485)/|title=ROYBAL, Edward R. {{!}} US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives|website=history.house.gov|access-date=2019-10-05}}</ref> In the late 1960s the founding of the Crusade for Justice in Denver in and the land grant movement in New Mexico in 1967 set the bases for what would become the Chicano (Mexican American) nationalism. The 1968 Los Angeles school walkouts expressed Mexican American demands to end segregation, increase graduation rates, and reinstate a teacher fired for supporting student organizing. A notable event in the Chicano movement was the 1972 Convention of La Raza Unida (United People) Party, which organized with the goal of creating a third party that would give Chicanos political power in the United States.<ref name="Mexican American voters"/>
Line 363:
This model of immigration and residential segregation, explained above, is the model which has historically been accurate in describing the experiences of Latino immigrants. However, the patterns of immigration seen today no longer follows this model. This old model is termed the standard spatial assimilation model. More contemporary models are the polarization model and the diffusion model: The spatial assimilation model posits that as immigrants would live within this country's borders, they would simultaneously become more comfortable in their new surroundings, their socioeconomic status would rise, and their ability to speak English would increase. The combination of these changes would allow for the immigrant to move out of the barrio and into the dominant society. This type of assimilation reflects the experiences of immigrants of the early twentieth century.<ref name="autogenerated9" />
 
Polarization model suggests that the immigration of non-black minorities into the United States further separates blacks and whites, as though the new immigrants are a buffer between them. This creates a hierarchy in which blacks are at the bottom, whites are at the top, and other groups fill the middle. In other words, the polarization model posits that Asians and LatinosHispanics are less segregated than their African-American peers because white American society would rather live closer to Asians or Latinos than African-Americans.<ref name="autogenerated6" />
 
The diffusion model has also been suggested as a way of describing the immigrant's experience within the United States. This model is rooted in the belief that as time passes, more and more immigrants enter the country. This model suggests that as the United States becomes more populated with a more diverse set of peoples, stereotypes and discriminatory practices will decrease, as awareness and acceptance increase. The diffusion model predicts that new immigrants will break down old patterns of discrimination and prejudice, as one becomes more and more comfortable with the more diverse neighborhoods that are created through the influx of immigrants.<ref name="autogenerated6" /> Applying this model to the experiences of Mexican Americans forces one to see Mexican American immigrants as positive additions to the "American melting pot", in which as more additions are made to the pot, the more equal and accepting society will become.
Line 413:
=== California ===
* [[Los Angeles, California]] area – [[History of the Mexican Americans in Los Angeles|The city proper is home to over 1.2 million of Mexican ancestry]], another 2.3 million throughout [[Los Angeles County, California|Los Angeles County]], and a total of about 6.3 million in the five-county [[Greater Los Angeles Area]]. Unsurprisingly, it has the largest Mexican American population in the United States. (according to the 2010 census, L.A. is now 31.9% of Mexican descent with numerous [[Central American]] national groups).
** [[East Los Angeles, California]] – Unincorporated community of roughly 130,000, name synonymous with Mexican Americans, 97% LatinoHispanic, 88% of Mexicans are immigrant, 40% of east L.A. residents reportedly Mexican including American-born.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov|title=U.S. Census website|date=29 November 2014|access-date=7 October 2017}}</ref>
** [[Montebello, California]] – Over 62% of the population is Mexican.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.infoplease.com/us/california/demographic-statistics-119 |title = Demographic Statistics for Montebello, California}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://maps.latimes.com/neighborhoods/neighborhood/montebello/|title=Montebello|website=Mapping L.A.|accessdate=4 December 2023}}</ref>
** [[Culver City, California]] – Also the site of the infamous [[Zoot Suit Riots]] in 1943.
** [[Long Beach, California]] – Third largest city in [[Southern California]], one of many cities in the region with a large Mexican/Latin American population.
** [[South Gate, California]] – Over 70.77% of the population is Mexican or Mexican American.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://zipatlas.com/us/ca/city-comparison/percentage-mexican-population.htm | title=Cities with the Highest Percentage of Mexicans in California &#124; Zip Atlas}}</ref>
** [[La Puente, California]] – About two-thirds are of Mexican ancestry or LatinoHispanic, one of the largest LatinoHispanic (in percentage, the most Mexican American community) populations in California.
** [[Downey, California]] - Between 45 and 50% are of Mexican descent.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-downey-latinos-20150805-story.html |title = Latinos' rising fortunes are epitomized in Downey|website = [[Los Angeles Times]]|date = 2015-08-05}}</ref>
** [[San Gabriel Valley]] – There is a large Mexican American community in San Gabriel Valley cities such as [[West Covina]]<ref>{{cite book|title=Mexican Americans: Leadership, Ideology, and Identity, 1930-1960}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Mexican American Baseball in the Central Coast|page=89}}</ref>
Line 428:
* [[San Diego]], California – slightly less than one-third of the city's population is Latino, primarily Mexican American, making it the lowest percentage of Latinos of any significant border city.
* [[Imperial Valley]] region ([[Imperial County, California]] and [[Yuma, Arizona]]).
* [[San Francisco Bay Area]] – also with over one million LatinosHispanics, many of whom are Mexican Americans, both US-born and foreign-born (see also [[Oakland, California|Oakland]] about 10–20% LatinoHispanic and [[San Francisco]] – the Mission District section- the city is 10–20% LatinoHispanic).
** [[East Palo Alto, California|East Palo Alto]]
** [[Half Moon Bay, California|Half Moon Bay]]
Line 434:
** [[Redwood City, California|Redwood City]]
** [[Oakland, California|Oakland]] – California's third largest Mexican-American city by percentage (over 25%) after Long Beach (about 30%). Many live in the [[Fruitvale, Oakland|Fruitvale]] district.
** [[San Jose, California|San Jose]] – Nearly one-third of the city's population is Mexican American or of LatinoHispanic origin; San Jose has the largest Mexican American population within the Bay Area.
** [[South San Francisco, California|South San Francisco]]
* [[Central Valley of California]] both the [[Sacramento Valley|Sacramento]] and [[San Joaquin Valley]]s have majority Mexican American communities. Examples being [[Sacramento, California|Sacramento]] and [[Fresno, California|Fresno]], and the heaviest concentrations in [[Kern County, California]] around [[Bakersfield, California|Bakersfield]].
 
=== Colorado ===
* [[Denver]] – Colorado has the eighth largest population of LatinosHispanics, seventh highest percentage of Latinos, fourth largest population of Mexican-Americans, and sixth highest percentage of Mexican-Americans in the United States. According to the 2010 census, there are over one million Mexican-Americans in Colorado.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://dola.colorado.gov/dlg/demog/2010data/race%20and%20hispanic%20origin%20muni.pdf|title=2010 Population by Race and Hispanic Origin|website=Dola.colorado.gov|access-date=7 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180919153224/http://dola.colorado.gov/dlg/demog/2010data/race%20and%20hispanic%20origin%20muni.pdf|archive-date=19 September 2018|url-status=dead}}</ref> Over one-third of the city's population is Mexican-American or Latino, as well as approximately one-fourth of the entire Denver Metropolitan area. About 17% of the cities population is foreign born, mostly from Latin America.
* [[Greeley, Colorado|Greeley]] – Over one-third of the city's population is LatinoHispanic, mostly Mexican-American.
** [[Garden City, Colorado|Garden City]] is LatinoHispanic majority and [[Evans, Colorado|Evans]] has a very large LatinoHispanic population as well.
* [[Demographics of Colorado|Southern Colorado]] is home to many communities of LatinosHispanics descended from Mexican settlers who arrived during Spanish colonial times. Roughly half of [[Pueblo, Colorado|Pueblo]]'s population is Latino, mostly Mexican-American. Many other towns in southern Colorado have high proportions of Mexican-Americans. [[La Junta, Colorado|La Junta]], [[Rocky Ford, Colorado|Rocky Ford]], [[Las Animas, Colorado|Las Animas]], [[Lamar, Colorado|Lamar]], [[Walsenburg, Colorado|Walsenburg]] and [[Trinidad, Colorado|Trinidad]] all have large Mexican American communities.
** [[San Luis Valley]] – The San Luis Valley has many towns with large Mexican-American populations. [[Antonito, Colorado|Antonito]], [[Blanca, Colorado|Blanca]], [[Center, Colorado|Center]], [[Del Norte, Colorado|Del Norte]], [[Fort Garland, Colorado|Fort Garland]], [[Monte Vista, Colorado|Monte Vista]] and [[Romeo, Colorado|Romeo]] are all LatinoHispanic majority.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://scseed.org/wb/media/SLV%20Statistical%20Profile%2012-03-07.pdf|title=San Luis Valley Statistical Profile|website=Scseed.org|access-date=7 October 2017}}</ref>
 
===Illinois===
Line 470:
* [[El Paso, Texas|El Paso]] – Largest Mexican-American community bordering a state of Mexico. 74% of El Paso is of Mexican descent, highest percentage of any city with a population of over 500k.
* [[South Texas]] – Heavily populated by Mexican-Americans, who are the ethnic majority, in a region spanning from [[Laredo, Texas|Laredo]] to [[Corpus Christi, Texas|Corpus Christi]] to [[Brownsville, Texas|Brownsville]].
* [[Harlingen, Texas]] – The LatinoHispanic population of Harlingen is 72% due to its proximity to the [[Rio Grande]] Mexico border.<ref>{{cite web |title=Race and Ethnicity in Harlingen, Texas |url=https://statisticalatlas.com/place/Texas/Harlingen/Race-and-Ethnicity |website=Statistical Atlas}}</ref>
 
===Wisconsin===
Line 477:
 
=== Other states ===
* [[Las Vegas]], Nevada - 70% of LatinosHispanics that are eligible to vote in [[Nevada]] are Mexican <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.pewresearch.org/hispanic/fact-sheet/latinos-in-the-2014-election-nevada/|title=Latinos in the 2014 Election: Nevada|accessdate=4 December 2023}}</ref>
** [[North Las Vegas, Nevada|North Las Vegas]] – 30.14% Mexican<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://zipatlas.com/us/nv/city-comparison/percentage-mexican-population.htm|title=Percentage of Mexican Population in Nevada by City &#124; 2023 &#124; Zip Atlas|website=zipatlas.com|accessdate=4 December 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nCuVDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT85|title=The Peoples Of Las Vegas: One City, Many Faces|isbn=9780874176513 |last1=Simich |first1=Jerry L. |last2=Wright |first2=Thomas C. |date=7 March 2005 |publisher=University of Nevada Press }}</ref>
* [[Yakima Valley AVA|The Yakima Valley]] and [[Tri-Cities, Washington]] – This region of [[Washington (state)|Washington]] contains many communities of Mexican-American majority thanks to high demand for agricultural labor.
* [[New York City]] – Mexicans are the third largest LatinoHispanic ethnic group after Puerto Ricans and Dominicans. New York City's Mexican population ranked 11th among major American cities in 2000 at 186,872.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.tc.columbia.edu/articles/2003/september/mexicans-are-now-new-york-citys-fastest-growing-ethnic-grou/|title = Mexicans Are Now New York City's Fastest Growing Ethnic Group}}</ref>
* [[Oklahoma]] - [[Oklahoma City]] and [[Tulsa]] have sizable growing Mexican populations.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://zipatlas.com/us/ok/city-comparison/percentage-mexican-population.htm|title=Percentage of Mexican Population in Oklahoma by City &#124; 2023 &#124; Zip Atlas|website=zipatlas.com|accessdate=4 December 2023}}</ref>
* [[Atlanta]] – Atlanta has a sizable Mexican population. Mexicans are the largest LatinoHispanic ethnic group in Atlanta.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Odem |first1=Mary |last2=Browne |first2=Irene |title=Understanding the Diversity Of Atlanta's Latino Population: Intersections of Race, Ethnicity, and Class |journal=Norteamérica, Revista Académica del CISAN-UNAM |date=19 December 2011 |volume=6 |doi=10.22201/cisan.24487228e.2011.3.147 |doi-broken-date=31 January 2024 |url=https://www.revistanorteamerica.unam.mx/index.php/nam/article/view/147 }}</ref> Mexicans are concentrated in [[Gwinnett County]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://documents.atlantaregional.com/gawsnapshots/mexican.pdf|title=Mexicans|accessdate=4 December 2023}}</ref>
* [[New Orleans]] – Mexicans are one of the largest LatinoHispanic groups in New Orleans following Hondurans.<ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.aag.org/a-glance-at-new-orleans-contemporary-hispanic-and-latino-communities/|title= A Glance at New Orleans' Contemporary Hispanic and Latino Communities|date= 2 October 2017}}</ref>
* [[Kansas]] – There is a large Mexican American presence in Kansas.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.kshs.org/kansapedia/mexican-americans-in-kansas/17874|title=Mexican Americans in Kansas - Kansapedia - Kansas Historical Society|website=www.kshs.org|accessdate=4 December 2023}}</ref>
* [[Detroit]] – In the early 1900s, many Mexican American families moved to Michigan and Detroit. The epicenter of Detroit's Mexican American community is [[Mexicantown, Detroit|Mexicantown]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.hsmichigan.org/mexicantown|title=Mexicantown &#124; Historical Society of Michigan|website=www.hsmichigan.org|accessdate=4 December 2023}}</ref>
* [[New Jersey]] The North Jersey region (nicknamed "Puebla Jersey" by migrants) is home to Mexican migrants and their descendants primarily from the states of Puebla and Oaxaca. The largest Mexican community is found in the small city of [[Passaic, New Jersey|Passaic]], where roughly a quarter of the city's population is of Mexican origin, where Mexicans began to arrive in the 1970s to work in mills.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/passaic-puebla-connection-new-jersey-enclave-rooted-in-one-mexican-state-1409965651 | title=Passaic-Puebla Connection: New Jersey Enclave Rooted in One Mexican State | newspaper=Wall Street Journal | date=6 September 2014 | last1=Haddon | first1=Heather | last2=Roman | first2=Esteban }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/new-jersey-city-has-mexican-flavor-of-the-state-of-puebla/ | title=New Jersey city has Mexican flavor of the state of Puebla | date=20 July 2017 }}</ref>
* [[Bridgeport]] and [[New Haven]], [[Connecticut]] have the 1st and 3rd largest Mexican populations in the [[New England]] region respectively in 2020 (alongside [[Boston]] at #2), despite being much smaller cities. The Mexican population of these respective cities began to grow in the 1990s from the tens into the hundreds, to around 8,000 each by 2020. New Haven has thousands of migrants from [[Tlaxcala]] (some of whom are reported [[Nahuatl]] speakers),<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.elalliance.org/languages/nahuatl | title=Nahuatl }}</ref> where New Haven is the primary destination for migrants. Mexicans are the second largest LatinoHispanic group in both cities, but in both they are heavily outnumbered by [[Puerto Ricans]] (Bridgeport has the 7th largest Puerto Rican community in the US), there they outnumber Mexicans roughly 4:1 there. Mexicans are the largest groups in the West End and North [[The Hollow, Bridgeport|Hollow]] census tracks of Bridgeport, while in New Haven they are the largest national origin group in East [[Fair Haven, New Haven|Fair Haven]].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.newhavenindependent.org/article/tlaxcala_dreams | title=Tlaxcala Dreams Land in New Haven }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://cinycmaps.com/index.php/ancestry-2013-17/2014-18-top-ahr | title=2014-18 Top AHR }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://data.census.gov/table?q=bridgeport,+connecticut&g=160XX00US0952000&tid=ACSDP5Y2020.DP05 | title=Explore Census Data }}</ref>
 
=== Other US destinations ===