Occupational prestige: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Adding local short description: "Public perception of an individual's job", overriding Wikidata description "Occupational prestige refers to the public perception of an individual’s social standing based on their professional position, rather than any unique personal attributes the individual holds."
Ce removing double dollars
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
Line 14:
Different people seem to weight these issues differently in their understanding of prestige. Most people seem to implicitly view prestige as a weighted average of income and education and this is the operational definition used in indices like DSI and ISEI. However other people (especially in the working class) seem to have more moralized notions of how much a job helps society and would, for instance, rate doctors high and lawyers low even though both jobs require postgraduate degrees and earn high incomes.<ref>Donald J. Treiman. (1977). Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York: ''Academic Press''.</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Young | first1 = Michael | last2 = Willmott | first2 = Peter | year = 1956 | title = Social Grading by Manual Workers | journal = British Journal of Sociology | volume = 7 | issue = 4| pages = 337–345 | doi=10.2307/586697| jstor = 586697 }}</ref>
 
The indicators most commonly used to measure SES come from Duncan's (1961) Socioeconomic Index (SEI), a composite of occupational prestige, income, and education. Duncan used data from North and Hart's study of 1949 occupational prestige and census data <ref name="North1949"/> to conduct the first correlational study of the statistical relationship between education, income, and occupation. Duncan focused on white males with at least a high school education and income of $3,500 dollars or more in 1949, and found correlations among income, public-ranking of occupational prestige, and educational level of around 0.75. The study did not report whether the index included a sample of ethnic minorities.<ref name="Easton2007">Donald Easton-Brooks & Alan Davis (2007). Wealth, Traditional Socioeconomic Indicators, and The Achievement Debt. ''The Journal of Negro Education''. Washington: Fall 2007. '''76''' (4); 530–542.</ref>
 
The SEI model continues to influence the way researchers measure SES. The National Educational Longitudinal Study (NELS:88, NCES, 1988) initially employed a measure of SES developed by Stevens and Featherman (1981) based on father's income, mother's income, father's education, mother's education, and father's and mother's occupation as rated by the SEI model. In the first-year follow-up study, the [[National Center for Education Statistics]] (1990) used the Nakao and Treas (1994) revised SEI model.