Reginald Dyer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
put epithet in bold per usual formatting practice, but including the quotes to avoid POV implications #article-section-source-editor
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
clean up, typo(s) fixed: As a result → As a result,
Line 30:
}}
 
[[Colonel (United Kingdom)|Colonel]] '''Reginald Edward Harry Dyer''', {{postnominals|country=GBR|CB}} (9 October 1864{{snd}}23 July 1927) was an officer of the [[Bengal Army]] and later the newly constituted [[British Indian Army]]. His military career began in the regular British Army but he soon transferred to the presidency armies of India.
 
As a temporary [[Brigadier (India)|brigadier-general]],<ref name="temp-bg" /> he was responsible for the [[Jallianwala Bagh massacre]] that took place on 13 April 1919 in [[Amritsar]] (in the province of [[Punjab (British India)|Punjab]]). He has been called '''"the Butcher of Amritsar"''',{{sfn|Collett|2006}} because of his order to fire on a large gathering of people. The official report stated that this resulted in the killing of at least 379 people and the injuring of over a thousand more.<ref>[[Ferdinand Mount]], [https://www.lrb.co.uk/v41/n07/ferdinand-mount/they-would-have-laughed "They would have laughed"], in ''London Review of Books'' dated 4 April 2019, Vol. 41, No.7, pp. 9–12</ref> Some submissions to the official inquiry suggested a higher number of deaths.{{sfn|Collett|2006|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=XuQC5pgzCw4C&pg=PA263 263]}}
Line 48:
==Amritsar massacre==
{{main|Jallianwala Bagh massacre}}
 
===Background===
In 1919, the European population in [[Punjab region|Punjab]] feared the locals would overthrow British rule. A nationwide [[hartal]] (strike action), which was called on 30 March (later changed to 6 April) by [[Mahatma Gandhi]], had turned violent in some areas. Authorities were also becoming concerned by displays of [[Hindu-Muslim unity]].<ref name=Chadha-1997>Chadha, Yogesh (1997). ''Gandhi: A Life'' John Wiley & Sons Inc. {{ISBN|0-471-35062-1}}</ref>{{RP|237}} [[Michael O'Dwyer]], the Lieutenant-Governor of Punjab, decided to deport major [[Political demonstration|agitator]]s from the province. One of those targeted was Dr. [[Satyapal]],<ref name=Chadha-1997/>{{RP|237}} a Hindu who had served with the [[Royal Army Medical Corps]] during the First World War. He advocated non-violent [[civil disobedience]] and was forbidden by the authorities to speak publicly. Another agitator was Dr. [[Saifuddin Kitchlew]],<ref name=Chadha-1997/>{{RP|237}} a Muslim barrister who wanted political change and also preached [[non-violence]]. The district magistrate, acting on orders from the Punjab government, had the two leaders arrested.<ref name=Chadha-1997/>{{RP|237}}
 
In protest at this action, demonstrators headed for the residence of Miles Irving, the Deputy Commissioner of Amritsar. The deputy commissioner had given orders that protestors were not to be allowed to pass into the [[Civil Lines|civil lines]] (the civilian administrative area, effectively the "British area" of town). [[Picquet (military)|Army picket]]s fired on the crowd, killing at least eight protesters and wounding others. As a result, angry mobs formed, returning to Amritsar's city centre, setting fire to government buildings and attacking Europeans in the city. Three British bank employees were beaten to death, and Miss Marcella Sherwood, who supervised the Mission Day School for Girls, was cycling around the city to close her schools when she was assaulted by a mob in a narrow street called the Kucha Kurrichhan. Sherwood was rescued from the mob by (Indian) locals.<ref name=Chadha-1997/>{{RP|237–239}} They hid the teacher, who was injured in the beating, before moving her to the fort. Dyer, who was the commandant of the infantry brigade in [[Jalandhar]], was incensed that a European woman had been attacked and decided to take action. He arrived on 11 April to assume command.{{sfn|Colvin|1929|p=[https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.208303/page/n181/mode/2up 162]}}
 
Though authorities initially claimed that the massacre was triggered by the assault on Sherwood, regimental diaries reveal that this was merely a pretext. Instead, Dyer and O'Dwyer feared an imminent mutiny in Punjab similar to the [[Indian Rebellion of 1857]].<ref name=ColonelAthaleDiaries>{{cite web|last=Athale|first=Rtd. Colonet Anil|title=What will be history's verdict on the Ramlila maidan eviction?|url=http://www.rediff.com/news/column/what-will-be-historys-verdict-on-the-ramlila-maidan-eviction/20110608.htm|work=columnist|publisher=rediff.com|access-date=9 June 2011}}</ref>
Line 70 ⟶ 71:
 
===Subsequent events===
The day after the massacre Dyer continued along confrontational lines, even though the city was quiet. He met with a delegation of Amritsar citizens to whom he directed the following speech, without having received their petitions or heard from them. Made to the delegation in [[Urdu]], the English translation of a segment of Dyer's statement is shown below, as given in Collett's ''The Butcher of Amritsar'':{{snfsfn|Collett|2006|p=270}}
{{blockquote|You people know well that I am a soldier and a military man. Do you want war or peace? If you wish for a war, the Government is prepared for it, and if you want peace, then obey my orders and open all your shops; else I will shoot. For me the battlefield of France or Amritsar is the same.}}
Dyer devised what even one of his generally supportive superiors, O'Dwyer, described as an "irregular and improper" retaliation for the attack on Marcella Sherwood, designed, it seemed, to fall indiscriminately and humiliatingly on the local population. On the street where the assault occurred, Kucha Kurrichhan, Dyer ordered daytime pickets placed at either end. Anyone wishing to proceed into the street between 6&nbsp;am and 8&nbsp;pm was made to crawl the {{convert|200|yd}} on all fours, lying flat on their bellies.<ref>{{cite book|last=Kent|first=Susan Kingsley|title=Aftershocks: politics and trauma in Britain, 1918–1931|year=2009|publisher=University of California|isbn=978-1-4039-9333-5|pages=37|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t7eypXVnabIC&pg=PT49}}</ref> When questioned at the Hunter inquiry about this, Dyer explained his motivation:<ref>{{multiref2|1={{cite book|last=Talbott|first=Strobe |title=Engaging India: Diplomacy, Democracy, and the Bomb |publisher=Brookings Institution Press|isbn=978-0-8157-8300-8| page=[https://archive.org/details/engagingindiadip00talb/page/245 245]|url=https://archive.org/details/engagingindiadip00talb |url-access=registration |date=2004}}|2={{cite news |last1=Kumar |first1=Mayank |title=The Crawling Order: A sign of imperial British atrocities |url=https://sundayguardianlive.com/news/crawling-order-sign-imperial-british-atrocities |work=The Sunday Guardian |date=16 April 2022}} }}</ref>{{bqblockquote|Some Indians crawl face downwards in front of their gods. I wanted them to know that a British woman is as sacred as a Hindu god and therefore, they have to crawl in front of her too.}} There was a curfew in effect from 8&nbsp;pm, so the order effectively closed the street for the full 24 hours. The houses and shops had no back doors, so the inhabitants could not go out without climbing down from their roofs. No deliveries or services were available to those effectively locked in, so no food or other supplies could be replenished, any sick or injured had no medical attendance, and normal rubbish and latrine sanitary services were absent. The trapped inhabitants included some of the individuals responsible for rescuing and attending to Sherwood, the assault victim. This order was in effect from 19 April until 25, or possibly, 26 April 1919. In addition, Dyer had flogging triangles erected in the street; on these, youths arrested for the assault, some of whom were not subsequently convicted, were publicly flogged in view of the residents.{{sfn|Colvin|1929|p=[https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.208303/page/n217/mode/2up 197]}}{{snfsfn|Collett|2006|pp=282–284}}
 
===Reaction in Britain and British India===