Content deleted Content added
Line 124:
*I see that you've been warned about this kind of drive-by edit-warring to try and force some subjective personal preference or other without discussion, by {{u|Zeng8r}}, {{u|NinjaRobotPirate}} and {{u|Sam Sailor}}. As they indicated, stop this behaviour or expect to have it discussed at a noticeboard. --<span style="font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#004d80;"> [[User talk:Begoon|Begoon]]</span> 23:21, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
** Fronticla, most of your edits improve articles by removing POV terms, euphemisms, etc. Some of your edits, however, go beyond what the manual of style recommends and remove perfectly acceptable words and phrases. ''This'' is what people are objecting to. If you would just listen to people and discuss your changes instead of edit warring, there would be a lot less frustration on both sides, I think. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 00:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
** Indeed. It was remiss of me not to point out that there are many useful edits too. What is '''not''' acceptable is removal of information with a comment like ''"put airdate info later in lede"'' as though this was a visit from the self-appointed style police, with a command on how to "fix" what really isn't broken - then edit-warring when that is reverted. Had you made an attempt to reword the content it may well have been an improvement, but you didn't, and refusal to discuss, accompanied by snotty comments like ''"read an FA"'' is really not helpful. The fact that you do this kind of thing in a series of "drive-by" edits is bound to antagonise people. Yes, your improvements, when they are such, are welcome - but you are '''not''' the "style police" and condescension coupled with refusal to discuss does not help anyone. Thanks. --<span style="font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#004d80;"> [[User talk:Begoon|Begoon]]</span> 00:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
| |||