Content deleted Content added
Mx. Granger (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 64:
:: I can't find issues of the ''Gloucestershire Echo'' or ''Cheltenham Chronicle'' on Google News or Google Books, only brief mentions of them in other sources. Someone probably could try to find physical copies if they lived in the UK, but I don't.
:: I don't think I have time to research sources further right now. I'm also not really familiar with English organists from the 1800s, I just as a layperson think the article compares poorly to [[Albertus_Bryne|others]] in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Composers/Lists_of_pages/Articles|composer category]]. Can I use an improvement template to flag this low-traffic article for editors with subject matter expertise? Would [[:Category:Articles with topics of unclear notability]] be reasonable? [[User:Blepbob|Blepbob]] ([[User talk:Blepbob|talk]]) 16:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Blepbob}} Yes, you can add [[Template:Notability]] to the article (which will automatically add the "unclear notability" category). You can also try posting at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Composers]] or [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gloucestershire]] to get input from people with more knowledge of the topic area. Or you can [[WP:PROD|PROD]] the article or nominate it for deletion, given the lack of available sources. —[[User:Mx. Granger|Mx. Granger]] ([[User talk:Mx. Granger|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Mx. Granger|contribs]]) 19:58, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
== Question from [[User:Mint Keyphase|Mint Keyphase]] (23:49, 4 July 2024) ==
| |||