S Marshall

*:Can you point out on what basis you think the community came to a consensus that the Telegraph unashamedly embraced the litterboxes in schools hoax? I understand that this was asserted. The basis of this is a few articles in the Telegraph about a teacher reprimanding/punishing a pupil for anti-trans statements, including a disparaging reference to another student identifying as a cat. However, some editors disputed that the coverage could be considered part of this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1227094010 particular] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1227082476 hoax]. The proposer of the RfC acknowledged in the face of this that whether the coverage fits into the category of the litterbox hoax was besides the point, as opposed to whether the articles [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1227125609 are evidence of false reporting.]

*:So saying that it has unashamedly embraced the litterbox hoax is the consensus of the community seems unsupported to me from the discussion itself. If the contention is that the reports on the Rye College incident were false and therefore sufficient evidence to declare DT unreliable on these topics, can I ask how you weighed this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1227468459 contribution by Chess], which many editors seem to have subscribed to and viewed as the last word on this issue. [[User:Samuelshraga|Samuelshraga]] ([[User talk:Samuelshraga|talk]]) 12:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC)