Content deleted Content added
→Hatnote removal on girl soldiers: new section |
→Hatnote removal on girl soldiers: Wouldn't object (reply to AddWittyNameHere) |
||
Line 261:
Hm...while on the one hand, I do see what you are getting at, I actually didn't so much intend it as a related-subject link, but rather due to the confusion possible as a result of the colloquial use of "girls" for "young adult women", which seemed relevant since the rank-and-file of soldiers tend to be young adults. With that consideration in mind, does your opinion on whether the hatnote should stay or go remain the same? I'm personally uncertain, so I'd quite appreciate your opinion. [[User:AddWittyNameHere|<span style="background:#42024b; color:#fcf09c;">'''''AddWitty'''''</span>]][[User talk:AddWittyNameHere|<span style="background:#fcf09c; color:#42024b;">''NameHere''</span>]] 00:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
:Ah, I see. I think that given [[Female soldiers]] redirects to [[Women in the military]], a hatnote there would [[WP:HATREDIR|make a lot of sense]]. That being said, with your rationale I think that if you wanted to restore the hatnote at [[Girl soldiers]], I wouldn't object: I hadn't thought of that reasoning. Thanks for the message. [[User:Sdrqaz|Sdrqaz]] ([[User talk:Sdrqaz#top|talk]]) 01:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
| |||