Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 141.126.255.119 - "→Mo Brooks: new section" |
Just a side note. |
||
Line 1:
<!-- PLEASE LEAVE MESSAGES AT THE BOTTOM -->
{{
==Indefinitely pending-protected pages by an inactive user==
I made requests in the previous month in the hopes of anyone addressing my statements, to say the least. However, those requests, including [[swimming (disambiguation)]], have been discarded with no input from admins due to a user who persistently insists that I am an affiliate of a telly-vandal who appears to live in the same range as I am. [[special:diff/1225308652|These were my reasons for unprotection]].[[Special:Contributions/102.156.121.163|102.156.121.163]] ([[User talk:102.156.121.163|talk]]) 15:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
:Given what happened [[Special:Permalink/1225130741#baseball bat, cyanide, ultrasound and Yuri Gagarin|the last time I answered your requests at RfPP]] (the lack of disruption afterwards suggests that you aren't asking for the articles to be unprotected so that you can disrupt them), I will take you at your word that you aren't them. This is also taking [[Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Television vandal from Tunisia|the LTA page]] into account. Unprotected, given the general lack of activity and disruption (FYI: {{u|Favonian}} and {{u|Ohnoitsjamie}}). [[User:Sdrqaz|Sdrqaz]] ([[User talk:Sdrqaz#top|talk]]) 02:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
:: Personally I agree with Favonian that we shouldn't be wasting our time processing requests from a likely sock, but on the other hand I don't particularly care whether or not swimming is protected at this time. If this user starts filling up RFPP again with pointless requests I will likely block them however. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 02:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
:::Honestly typing, that is what I planned to do in the future, but compiling the pages in one edit [[special:diff/1224351849|like this one]], nonetheless excluding media-related articles given the fact that the LTA case in my region being prevalent. But seriously, I was making requests mainly because of two reasons: 1)Page protector is inactive, and 2)Page is protected long enough (provided that it doesn't have a lengthy list of protection history). Why are you considering my case "pointless"? If you believe they are "pointless", then why did you accept my request for unprotecting [[pool (cue sports)]] in the first place?[[Special:Contributions/102.156.121.163|102.156.121.163]] ([[User talk:102.156.121.163|talk]]) 07:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
:::{{re|Ohnoitsjamie}} These requests are pretty valid from a policy point of view and are not what I would call pointless (I could get that perspective if they were requesting semi-protection removals for redirects, but these are "live" pages that have very little need for continued protection). I hope that the link between the LTA and these IPs isn't just being made because they're from Tunisia, given that this IP doesn't fit into the behavioural clues listed at the LTA page regarding lack of communication. [[User:Sdrqaz|Sdrqaz]] ([[User talk:Sdrqaz#top|talk]]) 15:43, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
::::Not only "lacking communication skills", but also persistent reverts. Users might have mistaken me an LTA user by accounting my reverts to [[special:diff/225159203|this edit]] as well as [[special:diff/1224082347|this edit]]. I am currently decreasing my activity for a while, as a means of accepting the [[wp:so]], provided that one of my ranges is meant to be blocked for 3 months.
::::I find out that negotiating issues with experienced editors interesting. However, there is one thing I intend to avoid but also uncertain if I am ever commiting it (if it is, I am sorry to type this) and that is: [[wp:hounding]]. I understand such behaviour leads to serious consequences/sanctions, but how can anyone tell if I am ever commiting it? (see also [[user talk:el C]])[[Special:Contributions/102.156.121.163|102.156.121.163]] ([[User talk:102.156.121.163|talk]]) 16:47, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
::I realized you did not remove or shorten protection from one of the pages. Since I have made that request again at [[user talk:lectonar]], I am unlikely that I would request that again given that he explained why indefinite protection is still necessary, albeit being protected for over five years.[[Special:Contributions/102.156.121.163|102.156.121.163]] ([[User talk:102.156.121.163|talk]]) 07:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
:::I assume that this is about [[Special:Permalink/1228598107#Protection of Big Brother series|the ''Big Brother'' articles]]. I don't really agree with that (I'm biased, but I think that [[Special:Permalink/1224388988#All Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards ceremonies articles between 2005 and 2018|my solution of introducing time limits]] for the Nickelodeon awards worked out all right), but I'll defer to {{u|Lectonar|him}} on this. [[User:Sdrqaz|Sdrqaz]] ([[User talk:Sdrqaz#top|talk]]) 15:43, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
::::The difference being that you down-protected almost all of them from semi to pending (actually that's also my take, downgrade to pending with time-limit, to evaluate the effect of it) whereas the Big brother ones are ''only'' pending changes protected to start with, afaics, and are still experiencing disruption on a lower level. [[User:Lectonar|Lectonar]] ([[User talk:Lectonar|talk]]) 07:19, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::True, but when there are on average only two reverted edits by non-autoconfirmed users in the past year, the need for continued protection is not as pronounced. [[User:Sdrqaz|Sdrqaz]] ([[User talk:Sdrqaz#top|talk]]) 21:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
::::Presently, the 2024 edition is experiencing dubious edits, albeit once protected for a week, earlier this month. What can you do?[[Special:Contributions/102.159.182.25|102.159.182.25]] ([[User talk:102.159.182.25|talk]]) 12:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::I'm wary that protection will be interpreted as an endorsement of a side in the [[Special:Diff/1229532681|only]]/[[Special:Diff/1230108331|first]] argument (and it should not be interpreted as such), but will place [[2024 Kids' Choice Awards]] under pending changes for two weeks. [[User:Sdrqaz|Sdrqaz]] ([[User talk:Sdrqaz#top|talk]]) 02:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
==DYK nomination of Better Off Dead?==
[[File:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Better Off Dead?]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at '''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Better Off Dead?|your nomination's entry]]''' and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[user:ltbdl|ltb]][[user:ltbdl/d|<span style="color:orange">d</span>]][[user:ltbdl|l]] ([[user talk:ltbdl|talk]]) 02:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Im sorry but what exactly did your remove from my user page?? [[User:RegierungDavidlands1852|RegierungDavidlands1852]] ([[User talk:RegierungDavidlands1852|talk]]) 10:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
:Hi, {{u|RegierungDavidlands1852}}. I removed some personal information from your user page, including information about your location. The material was [[WP:OS|suppressed]], meaning that the information was removed from public view, with administrators also unable to access it (only [[WP:OS#Users with oversight permissions|members of the Oversight team]] can).{{pb}}This was done to prevent possible harassment; you may find [[WP:OPCAD#Harassment related to personal information|this]] useful. As there is still some personal information on your user page, you may want to remove some of that too after reading the link above. [[User:Sdrqaz|Sdrqaz]] ([[User talk:Sdrqaz#top|talk]]) 23:41, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
::Speaking about revision deletions, can you take a closer look at [[special:history/One Montgomery Tower]] and decide for yourself which revisions and/or [[WP:ES]]es ought to or should not have been deleted?[[Special:Contributions/41.62.103.29|41.62.103.29]] ([[User talk:41.62.103.29|talk]]) 11:54, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
▲== Sgarvey ==
| |||