Content deleted Content added
Medicellis (talk | contribs)
help
Line 52:
::If anything smells ripe here, it's your refusal to assume good faith, even in the face of strong supporting evidence. -- [[User:Chovain|Mark]] [[User talk:Chovain|Chovain]] 06:20, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 
::* I figured someone would weigh in here with one of those trite ''“you know, the whole universe isn’t all organized to conspire against Greg L”''-things. Too easy to say. Getting all of Wikipedia organized against Greg L: not possible. Getting a single friend to rip someone you don’t like on Wikipedia: happens all the damed time. You know that (or at least should). And ''of course'' I looked at the edit histories. I examined '''''thousands''''' of edits on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment&action=history revision history of the Wikipedia:Requests for comment] and saw <u>''one single edit''</u> that WhatamIdoing made—to say *most* RfCs are deleted after 30 days. And then (same day) she posts a comment to a tediously long RfC 30 days and 1.5 hours after the previous post. And all this is only ''hours'' after I flame an administrator. Interesting. But I see that there are other RfC forums she has weighed in on, so I was wrong on that point. Still, the timing of things and the coincidences here are improbable and smell a bit too *ripe*. The presumption of good faith does not require the suspension of common sense. But I can ''“prove”'' nothing so I’m dropping it. I won’t be weighing in here again on this issue again. <u>Goodbye</u>. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">'''[[User:Greg L|Greg  L]]'''  ([[User_talk:Greg_L|talk]])</span> 12:54, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 
:::Ah, a "looking in the wrong place" error. RfC/Us, like all subpages, are not actually part of the parent page and thus edits to them don't appear in the parent page's history. Greg, if you'd be paying a bit of attention, you might have noticed that my endorsement of a view at your RfC/U -- [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGreg_L&diff=218655872&oldid=218651426 a view that you might recall having decided was actually ''favorable'' to you] -- didn't turn up in the list, and that might have led you to suspect that no others did, either.
Line 220:
Forget it, I've just read that I'm not allowed to remove the comment as I'm the creator of the page.15:29, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
:I will reply on your talk page. [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing#top|talk]]) 16:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 
== help with deletion of a article ==
I created [[Emergency Medical Dispatcher]] it was a good well written article with a significant amount of links and was cited with 6-7 links. I have been away a while and come back to find some one under handed it and [[WP:PROD]]. I know that you have some experience and would like guidance on how to get the article re-instated, a simple google search shows it meets WP:V and WP:N. thanks for your help in advance [[User:Medicellis|Medicellis]] ([[User talk:Medicellis|talk]]) 01:16, 6 October 2008 (UTC)