Content deleted Content added
Line 12:
:It was merged per [[Talk:United Nations REDD Programme#Merger Proposal]] and I feel it would be better rewritten to remove duplication and excess detail rather than split. However that would be a big job and as I am not going to do it I guess I should not vote on this split proposal unless someone else volunteers to do the work. Dunno if it would be beyond the scope of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors]] but I could ask if no one steps forward. [[User:Chidgk1|Chidgk1]] ([[User talk:Chidgk1|talk]]) 14:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
::Good to know - I saw the merger notice literally the minute after I posted this so feel pretty dumb for not checking beforehand! I do regret not being around for the merger discussion, as I do think UN-REDD and REDD+ should be separate. It seems in the discussion like there was some confusion around the 3 and how they are distinct from each other, so while I do agree with the comments that REDD and REDD+ should be in the same article (as was correctly mentioned, one superceded the other), I feel that as UN-REDD is a completely separate mechanism it merits its own article (albeit with some rewrites to make the distinction clearer).
::However, that's just my feeling on it, and if a consensus has already been reached then I'll stick with that. I can crack on with rewriting as I'm very much in the REDD+ space right now (literally just finished a uni course on it!) - will update in a separate section here. '''[[User:OliverEastwood|<span style="color: purple">OliverEastwood</span>]] [[User talk:OliverEastwood|<span style="color: violet">talk</span>]]''' 21:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
| |||