Talk:Skylab controversy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 895436157 by GeeBee60 (talk)I'm undoing an accidental undo
Line 1,754:
 
But you may have offered a solution to the so-called Skylab "mutiny." Write that paper you are thinking of and publish it in a peer reviewed journal. You, personally, couldn't add a discussion of that paper to the Wikipedia article (no self-referencing.) But I could, and would. And it would be a valid, non-primary source. No original research on my part. No primary references. Nothing which would violate any policy, real or imagined. [[User:Fcrary|Fcrary]] ([[User talk:Fcrary|talk]]) 19:56, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 
:There's plenty of evidence that ''something'' happened, starting with Capcom Richard Truly's airing of dirty laundry in one of the press briefing, a significant breach of etiquette. Within weeks of the return to earth of the final mission, Molly Ivins recorded interviews clearly displaying that there were communication problems. Yeah mutiny is an overly dramatic characterization of what went on. But for whole whole lot of reasons the final mission was not the same as any other mission to date. ALL you need to do is see that two career military men returned sporting copious beards to know there was something different. [[User:GeeBee60|GeeBee60]] ([[User talk:GeeBee60|talk]]) 07:06, 4 May 2019 (UTC)