Content deleted Content added
→Can we clean this up some more?: That supports a recent addition about original transcripts (corrected to add signature) |
→Can we clean this up some more?: Comments |
||
Line 1,746:
:Actually, that could complement the added/removed/restored text I mentioned previously, concerning the actual transcripts. If Emily Carney said it didn't happen and pointed to the mission transcripts, then no one could reasonably call it original research. It's what a valid source said, and a reference to the primary reference that source mentioned. [[User:Fcrary|Fcrary]] ([[User talk:Fcrary|talk]]) 20:04, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
::After participating a lot in this discussion I have stepped back, mostly for personal (health) reasons but also because I'm having a hard time seeing where we find consensus. To NOT have an article that acknowledges the ''belief'' in a mutiny is ludicrous. There are editors who perform somersaults discrediting some sources while accepting others. I spent a lot of time on a possible revision to the article but I cannot bring it to fruition and would deeply appreciate it if someone else would take it on. [[User:GeeBee60|GeeBee60]] ([[User talk:GeeBee60|talk]]) 14:24, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
| |||