Content deleted Content added
→edits to trans athletes article: Regarding history |
SheWhoSees (talk | contribs) responded re consensus |
||
Line 63:
::::::::EvergreenFir's conjecture of "trans identified male" being either an innocent mistake by someone naive about the topic, or an insult makes sense to me. In the latter case, I wonder if it could be a purposeful misgendering by someone knowledgeable about the topic at the expense of someone who did not self-identify that way, with the intent either to insult them, or perhaps with the primary intent to express or trumpet their own group identity to other clan members by "performing essentialness," at the cost of a callous disregard of someone else's feelings. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 08:26, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
*I would consider the additions I made to the history section as a start and nowhere near broad coverage yet. It may need rearranging as I (or anyone else) adds information. I would think that the Olympics is a big enough part of this to justify a sub heading in either case. Most of the sources and controversy seems to surround transwomen competing in womens sports so the article will probably be dominated by that aspect, but we should try and include mentions of the reverse. I would also guess the trans athletes that don't get challenged generally don't make the news so it can be harder to find info on them. At the end of the day we can only include what has already been recorded. [[User:Aircorn|AIR<font color="green">'''''corn'''''</font>]] [[User talk:Aircorn|(talk)]] 22:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
[[User:Mathglot]] how will consensus work when two of you are agreeing and reversing my edits amongst many conjectures from you both?[[User:SheWhoSees|SheWhoSees]] ([[User talk:SheWhoSees|talk]]) 01:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
|