Talk:Video game controversies: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
YVNP (talk | contribs)
Line 288:
too much pov in this article. it has a lot of good points but most of it is pov, it seems to take the bias that videogames are bad, and throw a little counterbalance. balance and citations!! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/78.148.184.135|78.148.184.135]] ([[User talk:78.148.184.135|talk]]) 01:29, 19 October 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Actually it seems to me that the article is pro-gaming and does not back up it's claims. I've taken away some blatantly unsourced statements but shit sucks[[User:YVNP|YVNP]] ([[User talk:YVNP|talk]]) 00:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 
== Publicized incidents ==
 
While there isn't a problem with this section per se, I really think it needs to be elaborated upon that [[correlation does not imply causation]]. These incidents very likely involved mentally unstable individuals who, by device of their own instability, have commited these various acts. To falsely attribute these acts to video game content is just illogical. (this isn't what the section is currently doing, but I think it would be important to note these incidents in the least accusing way as possible) It would be similar to me attributing violent crime to McDonald's just because a violent crime took place in a McDonald's restaurant. [[Special:Contributions/74.242.104.128|74.242.104.128]] ([[User talk:74.242.104.128|talk]]) 02:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)