Content deleted Content added
m →Main sections: mobile typos |
→top: Fixed typo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit |
||
Line 105:
:::The current layout with all the dates diced, sliced and shuffled makes my head spin, it is horrible. I would agree with {{u|Marc Lacoste}} that the legal games belong broadly in development. For example where the current Development content suddenly jumps to Airbus ownership, there should be an intermediate section describing the takeover and any related legal aspects. There is no reason to group the legal issues together. Much the same applies to the Marketing section, much of which has nothing to do with operators. If the Development section then gets too huge, it should be divided up more or less chronologically into say Bombardier, Airbus partnership and Buyout, or whatever broad brushstrokes make sense once the chronology is clearer. — Cheers, [[User:Steelpillow|Steelpillow]] ([[User Talk:Steelpillow|Talk]]) 15:58, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
:As someone new to this article but familiar with other aircraft articles, the term "Legal aspects" sounds vague and unclear as a main section in an article about an aircraft (and so does "[[CSeries dumping petition by Boeing]]" in my view). On the other hand, the tale of the Airbus business deal is a long and tedious one, and probably fairly off-topic for the average reader wishing to learn about the aircraft itself.
=== Images ===
| |||