Talk:Beard

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by S0091 (talk | contribs) at 19:02, 14 July 2024 (OneClickArchived "Ancient Greece and Ancient Macedon?" to Talk:Beard/Archive 1). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 1 month ago by 2600:1702:4910:4EB0:848F:79FB:A424:D83B in topic Beards and American politics

Curiosity about the linguistic part

Is there any particular reason why English has no distinction between hair under the skin, hair piercing the skin, calling hair that has not pierced the skin for stubble, 1-2mm of hair pierced is also called stubble, hair past the stubble stage, and actually letting the hair grow? --Stalkerkun (talk) 21:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Beards on plants

There is no mention in the article that plants also have beards. Such as Irises (Bearded Irises) Was going to add a section under animals about plant beards, but thought better ask what other editors think first ! DavidAnstiss (talk) 11:45, 11 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

I think (with full respect) that you are out of your mind, good sir! 71.51.137.25 (talk) 08:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Heads Up Warning

Some people got it in their heads to vandalize this article re: the concept of 'neckbeards'. Such a person is defined as an unpleasing, overweight person who does not shave. Thus the beard part. I reverted the vadalism but they might be back. Lots42 (talk) 18:50, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Article contradicts itself

Near the beginning of the article is says beards are mostly found in males but a small number of females can posses them but later in the section about their evolutionary history the article states they're exclusively found in men. --174.102.9.42 (talk) 20:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The lead specifically qualifies the exception to be "women with hirsutism", specifically identifying the cause of the exception. The article then covers that standard (by far mast majority) of the population. So, I don't see it as a contradiction. That said, the subject of hirsutism should be breifly mentioned somewhere in the body of the article - not just the lead section. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 21:01, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sumerians and beards? Seems incorrect

The article enumerates all the Mesopotamian civilizations as having beard-growing traditions. This seems incorrect to me. I may be mistaken, but as far as I know, the non-Semitic Sumerians tended to shave the beard. On the other hand, the Semitic Akkadians (and other Semitic peoples that settled in Mesopotamia in several later waves), always had a beard tradition (like all the Semites, in fact - this seems to be a very ancient and deeply rooted Semitic custom). I read (in Vojtech Zamarovsky's book about Sumer) that the pioneer Assyriologists, while digging in Mesopotamian sites, noted the absence of the beard in depictions of men in earlier archaeological layers, which contrasted with the later Akkadian depictions of bearded kings, deities, soldiers etc. What I know for fact is that no Akkadian/Assyrian/Babylonian king is ever depicted without a beard, while the well-known diorite statue of Gudea, the ensi of Lagash, depicts him as cleanly shaven. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.218.33.195 (talk) 13:47, 21 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Added appropriate info to the section "Mesopotamia".81.218.33.195 (talk) 15:34, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Philosopher's beard

The Art of Living is the only source for this section. On page xii of the Preface, the book says "My discussion of the philosopher's beard is intended as a light-hearted and 'entertaining' opening into proceedings and should not be taken too seriously." I don't think this can be considered a legit source and this section should probably be deleted if a better source cannot be found. Vagary (talk) 18:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

The source nonetheless seems to be reliable and the particular content about the "philosopher's beard" in that source seems well-sourced itself. I agree that the section should be supported by more reliable sources, and perhaps expanded beyond Ancient Greece and Rome, but I don't think deleting the section entirely is really appropriate. The "philosopher's beard" is a pretty well-established cultural phenomenon that appears to stretch back at least a couple millennia and is especially well known among those who study philosophy. Even with only a couple sources supporting the section, I think it's worthwhile to keep. At the very most, the section should be demoted to a subsection somewhere else in the article (such as under Beard § Ancient and classical world or § Styles) and perhaps trimmed a bit in order to not appear to be given undue wieght. If I can find any worthwhile reliable sources to include for this section, I'll promptly do so. If nothing else, we can simply find and directly use the sources cited in the source in question, if only to fill out the citations in the section. ―Nøkkenbuer (talkcontribs) 13:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Beard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Beard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:08, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Hulihee, a style of beard

Please see Talk:Hulihee for a red-hot, fascinating, bizarre, and completely stunning discussion over the notability of this style of beard!!! Okay, that was just advertising. It's just a normal discussion, but please check it out anyhow. Thanks! :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

A man with a beard has something to hide

A term from the 1930"s or so. A "beard" was the man who covered illicit activity for his friend. For instance, if Man #1 was having an affair, Man #2 was his "beard" covering up for him. Therefore the phrase: "A man with a beard has something to hide." In current news two famous people who grew beards when they were "caught" are Bill Cosby & Harvey Weinstein. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hates Beards (talkcontribs) 19:04, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Beards and American politics

In the last few years, beards are no longer so rare in American politics, with figures such as Paul Ryan, Ted Cruz, Tom Cotton, and Dan Crenshaw with beards. Ironically, most bearded politicians today seem to be from the conservative wing of the Republican Party.

This might be due to the popularity of beards with veterans, and their growing association with younger conservative men. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BD0F:1C80:6821:5E44:ED2F:52A3 (talk) 03:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

The photos on Ryan's and Cotton's pages need updating; all the photos show them clean shaven. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 07:31, 21 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Since only Caucasian men can grow beards, they are used as a symbol of Caucasian supremacy.
The Taliban also has long beards. 2600:1702:4910:4EB0:848F:79FB:A424:D83B (talk) 18:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Pre-Columbian Beards?

This article is conspicuously missing information about beards in the Americas in the Pre-Columbian era. 95.146.59.90 (talk) 01:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

It's impossible for Native American men to grow beards.
Caucasians were initially called "hairy bearded men with an extra bone in their forehead, sunken eyes and hooked noses" by Native Americans.
Asians also noticed the same racial differences. 2600:1702:4910:4EB0:848F:79FB:A424:D83B (talk) 18:53, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Worth cross-editing with Facial hair?

The Facial hair article is quite short, so a particularly keen editor of this article might like to check it out and make some expansions. Sxologist (talk) 11:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:53, 8 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:53, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Beards and attractiveness

Came here expecting at least some information on perception of beards, particularly on attractiveness and popularity across different societies, in different periods, and also in different subpopulations (e.g. different sexual orientations). This would surely be relevant and deserving of a section, would it not? (I have no information to contribute though unfortunately, beyond my personal opinion on them which is obviously not encyclopaedia content) Anditres (talk) 06:52, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Infobox image

There has been a history of images used on the infobox. I don't have time for the full story, but recently it was changed from Jack Passion [1], to Richard Stallman [2], to an unnamed person [3], back to Stallman, [4] then some random guy's selfie. [5]. I have removed the image for now and inserted a note to not add any image before a consensus can be formed here. 0xDeadbeef 18:41, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

My suggestion would be this.
 
The beard is the focus of the image, it's not of anyone famous, and is very high quality. (Hohum @) 13:28, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I agree, though it is drawn, which might be an issue. I don't care which image is used, there should just be an image in the infobox. Holzklöppel (talk) 23:48, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
This image is my preference as well. Generalrelative (talk) 15:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
IP 69.166.44.3, will you please explain why you keep removing this image, claiming in your edit summarie that it is "ugly" or "bad"? It seems to me to be a high quality image. Further, it seem to be appropriate for this page for the other reasons stated by Hohum above. Generalrelative (talk) 06:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reinstate image until a replacement is found

Since there is no replacement image right now, I will reinstate the version including the image of Stallman which is appropriately licensed. The article should have an image detailing its subject, temporary removal is not the best option since this is a rather general article with potentially lots of traffic. Holzklöppel (talk) 19:55, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Holzklöppel: Does the infobox need an image at all? If someone wants to know what a beard looks like, wouldn't they just scroll down and see illustrations for different kinds of beards? 0xDeadbeef 04:00, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Sure, I'll copy one of these into the infobox. The it's prominently displayed on both WP and other sites which process information from it, like DuckDuckGo. Holzklöppel (talk) 23:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

More information?

First of all: The only race with the ability to grow facial hair is the Caucasian race. Asians and Native Americans initially called Caucasians "hairy bearded people with an extra bone in their forehead, sunken eyes, and hooked noses". Growing a beard is a sign of Caucasian supremacy. Notable Caucasian supremacist groups, such as the Taliban, wear beards. Second of all, who wrote this article? °Name °Email or phone °Age °Race °Nationality °Job It would really help me understand what the heck this is all about. 2600:1702:4910:4EB0:848F:79FB:A424:D83B (talk) 18:51, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply