Revision as of 12:55, 2 June 2024 edit 2a02:cb80:427a:354a:fcf7:371d:fa42:4f39 (talk) →‎The section on "threats" is too long Tag: Reverted ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:56, 2 June 2024 edit undo Ben Azura (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 1,088 edits Undid revision 1226895667 by 2A02:CB80:427A:354A:FCF7:371D:FA42:4F39 (talk) Tag: Undo Next edit →
Line 98: == The section on "threats" is too long == I think we need to condense the section on "threats" a bit and make it clearer that there is a sub-article on [[biodiversity loss]] that covers exactly this. Otherwise we have the problem that we have to updated and maintain the same kind of content in two different articles. ~~Abcdefg~~Threats is really all about [[biodiversity loss]], isn't it? [[User:EMsmile\|EMsmile]] ([[User talk:EMsmile\|talk]]) 09:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC) ~~is really all about [[biodiversity loss]], isn't it? [[User:EMsmile\|EMsmile]] ([[User talk:EMsmile\|talk]]) 09:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)~~ : I've just added the template "section size" to this talk page above. You can see from that table that the section on threats has become far too long. It is currently the biggest section of this article. See here in the order of biggest section size: * Threats 58,248

Talk:Biodiversity: Difference between revisions