Talk:Black War: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m correct even -> event
Line 242:
:OK, I have a question. Why does it look like that section, which makes claims about historiography, primarily cites what are presumably works about the history rather than works {{em|about}} the historiography? Do we not have quotes of people saying "this is what most historians are saying about this"? Surely at least a couple of those books go into what other people in their field are saying instead of just their own points? [[User:Alpha3031|Alpha3031]] ([[User talk:Alpha3031|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alpha3031|c]]) 14:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
::The sub-section heading was recently changed from "Genocide debate" to "Historiography" by an editor [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_War&diff=prev&oldid=1226037263Here here]. I agree that the new section heading is misleading and should be changed because the section is really about the current genocide debate. Once we get a consensus on the RfC question we can then look at the section headings. Hope this answers your question. [[User:Aemilius Adolphin|Aemilius Adolphin]] ([[User talk:Aemilius Adolphin|talk]]) 21:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
:::Our coverage of discussion on how RS describe a historical evenevent {{em|should}} be titled historiography. I don't see how it would be possible to answer the RFC question without a survey of the appropriate sources. [[User:Alpha3031|Alpha3031]] ([[User talk:Alpha3031|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alpha3031|c]]) 05:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 
== Crisis Years ==