Content deleted Content added
Line 239:
:'''No''', not in Wikivoice (or indeed at all) without a strong consensus of RS, and not solely as a genocide as above comments.[[User:Lukewarmbeer|Lukewarmbeer]] ([[User talk:Lukewarmbeer|talk]]) 17:40, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - I find the no arguments pretty convincing, but would like to hear what the nom. has to say before coming down firmly on one side or the other. In an RfC, the nom. typically enters a !vote too. [[User:Sirfurboy|Sirfurboy🏄]] ([[User talk:Sirfurboy|talk]]) 10:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
:OK, I have a question. Why does it look like that section, which makes claims about historiography, primarily cites what are presumably works about the history rather than works {{em|about}} the historiography? Do we not have quotes of people saying "this is what most historians are saying about this"? Surely at least a couple of those books go into what other people in their field are saying instead of just their own points? [[User:Alpha3031|Alpha3031]] ([[User talk:Alpha3031|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alpha3031|c]]) 14:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
== Crisis Years ==
| |||