{{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. | India Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Pakistan Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
{{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. | Medicine C‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Pharmacology Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
snuff vs. American chewing tobacco
Just edited the page to change references to snuff to American chewing tobacco. Unlike snuff, this is chewed, not snorted. I also wanted to minimize confusing this product with Swedish snus, which studies are showing may have significantly lower health risks than other tobaccos, and appears to have rates of cancer very close to rates seen among the non-tobacco using populations. --NightMonkey 21:41, Jul 29, 2004 (UTC)
Just got a bag of RMD
Being a long time Skoal, Cope, Red Man, and nasel (nose) snuff user I am just after buying a few bags of RMD for about $1.50 CDN (Canadian) each. I would say that the quote "It imparts upon its user a "buzz" somewhat more intense than that of tobacco." is an understatement. Just my two cents.142.161.162.197 (talk) 09:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)Some.Canadian.IP.Address[1]
- It's been several years, and I got a box of 50 from eBay for a fraction of the price. Nice! 206.45.160.228 (talk) 19:14, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Some.Canadian.IP.Address
References
- ^ Me, Myself, and I
Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here, here, here, and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 22:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Gutka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140514033800/http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/up-stand-on-gutkha-ban-contrary-to-earlier-assurance-hc/1001455/ to http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/up-stand-on-gutkha-ban-contrary-to-earlier-assurance-hc/1001455/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:57, 28 August 2015 (UTC)