Content deleted Content added
→Periodization: Reply |
→Periodization: Reply |
||
Line 480:
:::::::::Interesting, I think I get what you are saying now. Sounds like quite the intellectual adventure that I don't want to embark on right now, but I support you if you want to rewrite the article accordingly. --[[User:Cerebellum|Cerebellum]] ([[User talk:Cerebellum|talk]]) 14:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::If you just want to discuss these paradigms as paradigms, you could do that at [[World history (field)]]. But it seems you are suggesting that our article here uses three timelines to tell human history three times, once for each paradigm (one main section per paradigm?). Is that correct? [[User:Phlsph7|Phlsph7]] ([[User talk:Phlsph7|talk]]) 07:13, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::This feels like putting far too much weight on the field, which despite the name is a still a very niche and (ironically) US-centric discipline. This article is about human history and the vast majority of historians of humanity do not work within a 'world history' framework. – [[User:Joe Roe|Joe]] <small>([[User talk:Joe Roe|talk]])</small> 07:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
| |||