Content deleted Content added
Line 8:
Should we make this list exhaustive? I am just asking. If yes, go ahead; if not, don't. Thanks! [[User:Caehlla|Caehlla]] ([[User talk:Caehlla|talk]]) 13:32, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
:Well, personally I prefer to keep this list to ''commonly used'' taxonomic affixes; i.e. those affixes that people are most likely to stumble across in the real world. <b>[[User:Serendipodous|<font color="#00b">Serendi</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Serendipodous|<sup><font color="#b00">pod</font></sup>]]<font color="#00b">[[User talk: Serendipodous|ous]]</font></b> 13:35, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
::I would argue that the list is pretty subjective as it is. The world of taxonomy is so large that it would be hard to objectively compile a representative list of common taxonomic affixes. I would argue for an exhaustive list. I don't see why wikipedia would want just some of a topic, and not as exhaustive as possible. [[Special:Contributions/132.239.112.44|132.239.112.44]] ([[User talk:132.239.112.44|talk]]) 20:46, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
| |||