Revision as of 05:07, 2 February 2014 edit White whirlwind (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 28,674 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:30, 20 February 2014 edit undo TI. Gracchus (talk \| contribs) 255 edits →‎Citations: new section Next edit →
Line 171: --[[User:Faust\|Faust]] ([[User talk:Faust\|talk]]) 16:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC) == Citations == I worked a bit on a good article nomination with White Whirlwind some time ago. Not sure I have the time to be a reviewer for this one, but I would think the first thing a reviewer would want to talk about is the citations. I think it's a good, compressed style, but I've never seen citations done like this before. In addition, the citations make a reference to a 1998 Mair text which doesn't appear in the works cited list, as well as a "authorless" work in the works cited, which seems a bit strange. Are they the same work or what? [[User:TI. Gracchus\|TI. Gracchus]] ([[User talk:TI. Gracchus\|talk]]) 19:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Zhuangzi (book): Difference between revisions