Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates

Featured and good topics in Wikipedia

This star symbolizes the featured topic candidates on Wikipedia.

GA icon symbolizing Good topic candidates on Wikipedia.

A featured topic (FT) is a collection of inter-related articles in which at least half are featured articles or featured lists. The remaining articles must be at least good quality.

A good topic (GT) is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though are not necessarily featured articles) with a less stringent quality threshold than a featured topic.

This page is for the nomination of potential featured and good topics. See the featured and good topic criteria for criteria on both types of topic.

Before nominating a topic, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at the Featured and good topics talk page. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the FTC/GTC process. If you nominate something you have worked on, note it as a self-nomination. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the articles of the topic should consult regular editors of the articles prior to nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly.

The featured and good topics coordinators Aza24, MaranoFan and Kyle Peake determine the timing of the process for each nomination. For a nomination to be promoted to FT or GT status, consensus must be reached for a group to be promoted to featured or good topic status. If enough time passes without objections being resolved, nominations will be removed from the candidates topic and archived.

To contact the FGTC coordinators, please leave a message on the FGTC talk page, or use the {{@FGTC}} notification template elsewhere.

You may want to check previous archived nominations first:

Purge the cache to refresh this page

Shortcuts

Featured content:

Good content:

Featured and good topic tools:

Nomination procedure

To create a new nomination use the form below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Saffron/archive1) and click the "Create new nomination" button.

Once the nomination page is created, remember to transclude it in the appropriate section below, to leave nomination templates on the talk pages of the articles nominated for the topic. For detailed instructions on how to nominate topics or add articles to existing topics, see Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Nomination procedure.

Supporting and objecting

Please review all the articles of the nominated topic with the featured and good topic criteria in mind before deciding to support or oppose a nomination.

To edit nominations in order to comment on them, you must click the "edit" link to the right of the article nomination on which you wish to comment (not the overall page's "edit this page" link).
If you approve of a nomination, write '''Support''' followed by your reasons. Supports that clearly evaluate the criteria will be weighted more than those that do not.
If you oppose a nomination, write '''Oppose''' or '''Object''' followed by the reason for your objection. Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to fix the source of the objection, the objection may be ignored.
- To withdraw an objection, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.

For a topic to be promoted to featured or good topic status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. The FGTC coordinators are usually the ones to assess this consensus and close FGTC discussions. If there is a consensus to promote, the promote instructions are located here. If enough time passes without objections being resolved (at least one week), nominations will be removed from the candidates list and archived. Nominations will stay here for ten days if there is unanimous consent, or longer if warranted by debate.

Featured topic nominations

2008 Summer Olympics

The 2008 Summer Olympics, officially the Games of the XXIX Olympiad and officially branded as Beijing 2008, were an international multi-sport event held from 8 to 24 August 2008, in Beijing, China. A total of 10,942 athletes from 204 National Olympic Committees competed in 28 sports and 302 events. China, who was hosting the Olympics for the first won, won the most gold medals (48) while an unprecedented 87 countries won at least one medal.

2008 Summer Olympics

4 articles

2008 Summer Olympics medal table

List of 2008 Summer Olympics medal winners

Venues of the 2008 Summer Olympics

Contributor(s): Evanh2008 and Scorpion0422 (x3)

I happened to notice that Wikipedia:Featured topics/1952 Winter Olympics exists and, in looking for lists to work on, I noticed that the same set of lists were also promoted for the 2008 Summer Olympics. As such, I'd like to nominate it for featured topic status. The main article was promoted to GA in 2013 and survived a GA re-assessment in 2023. The medal table list was promoted in 2008 and the medal winners and venues lists were promoted in 2009. Note that I haven't contributed to the topic, I'm just nominating the set since it matches another topic. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:09, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Josh, this would need a short paragraph at the top to satisfy the topic criteria. You could probably adapt it from the lead of 2008 Summer Olympics. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TechnoSquirrel69: Blech, Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Nomination procedure needs a rework... I've added something brief since it's not clear to me just how much / what the nominators would want for this. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I get that this topic directly matches the 1952 Winter equivalent, I'd actually argue that the 1952 topic is incomplete without the torch relay article as it is in the primary category (it was created in 2012, after the topic was passed in 2011). The problem is that Wikipedia's coverage of the 2008 Summer Games is much more extensive than that of the 1952 Winter edition. There are many more articles which could very well be included in a topic which covers the tournament in whole, such as the chronological summary, bids, opening and closing ceremonies, and controversies (and possibly more). Idiosincrático (talk) 20:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There are a lot of articles in Category:2008 Summer Olympics, a few feel relevant. I'd expect for example 2008 Summer Olympics opening ceremony in any complete topic. CMD (talk) 00:37, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinators: I'm happy to withdraw this nomination. I brought it up on the Discord and others encouraged a nomination. I do agree with the concerns raised, but I myself am not interested in completing the work that would be required to make this into a topic. I just figured I'd nominate it based on the other topic was all :) Hey man im josh (talk) 13:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@FGTC coordinators: I don't love to do this, but I since it's been a few days, I thought I'd ping to clear this out of the way. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:05, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closed with a consensus not to promote and nominator's withdrawal there is no reason to keep this nomination open, thereby I declare it closed best of luck for next time! --K. Peake 21:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1989 (album) (4th supplementary nomination)

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/1989 (album) for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1989

15 articles

"Welcome to New York"

"Blank Space"

"Style"

"Out of the Woods"

"All You Had to Do Was Stay"

"Shake It Off"

"I Wish You Would"

"Bad Blood"

"Wildest Dreams"

"This Love"

"Clean"

"You Are in Love"

"New Romantics"

The 1989 World Tour

1989 (Taylor's Version) ^(subtopic)

i created the article for i wish you would, and promoted it to ga status. fortunately, it still has the required amount of featured articles for this ft to remain as a featured topic. yay brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 02:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I am curious which recent event made "I Wish You Would" suddenly notable, and why the same notability would not extend to songs like "How You Get the Girl" (whose Taylor's version charted two spots lower in Canada and nine in the US) and "I Know Places" (three spots lower in Canada and five in the US). It would be preferable not to delay those, if they are notable already, just because there aren't enough FAs for the topic to remain featured.--N Ø 09:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hold for All You Had to Do Was Stay, which was GA-nominated just five days after the nomination. I would personally like to see the other two tracks on the standard edition join the topic together in the next addition. This really does not need to go through four different addition processes.--N Ø 14:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait – per above. Idiosincrático (talk) 12:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Now that both All You Had to Do Was Stay and I Wish You Would can be added, the topic can remain featured. @Brachy0008: is there any movement on the creation of "I Know Places" and/or "How You Get the Girl"? Is there a reason why these articles don't exist, are the songs not notable enough, or have the articles simply not been made? Idiosincrático (talk) 01:32, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  we haven't dug up sources for i know places and how you get the girl yet. furthermore, if they are made, there would be a bit more issues keeping this a featured topic. the plan is to get bad blood to FA, then create articles for both i know places and how you get the girl, so yes, those articles are being held back a bit. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 02:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  update: i created the draft for i know places. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 23:47, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – although I don't really like the thought of holding the creation of new articles for the sake of a topic's status, I see that there is little motivation in creating these articles at the moment. As a result I support the nomination per the current collection of Wiki's articles, as I guess you can't oppose based on articles people can't or are unwilling to make (again it could be that these songs aren't notable enough to even have articles). I think in future, if there are more articles to make for a potential topic, a GTC discussion should probably be delayed until the new articles are created. Idiosincrático (talk) 14:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - albeit we have to agree not every track is worth an article, specially those that need some extensive research to just get enough material to write about. Not that this subtracts from your dedication. igordebraga ≠ 02:28, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Meghan Trainor albums (1st supplementary nomination)

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Meghan Trainor albums for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

Timeless (Meghan Trainor album)

Meghan Trainor albums

9 articles

Title (EP)

Title (subtopic)

Thank You (subtopic)

The Love Train

Treat Myself (subtopic)

A Very Trainor Christmas

Takin' It Back (subtopic)

Timeless

In this update to the Trainor albums topic, her latest album, Timeless, joins the ranks after being promoted to GA.--N Ø 04:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Supplementary nom. Idiosincrático (talk) 06:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support glad to see this premoted in a timely fashion. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 07:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, nice work. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 15:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Great work on adding her most recent album. Pseud 14 (talk) 19:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awesome job! joeyquism (talk) 17:15, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Straight forward and makes sense. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support As straightforward as it gets. -- Zoo Blazer 07:26, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to approve supplement to the Good Topic --K. Peake 19:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1993 Atlantic hurricane season (1st supplementary nomination)

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/1993 Atlantic hurricane season for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season

1993 Atlantic hurricane season

8 articles

Tropical Depression One

Tropical Storm Arlene

This supplemental nomination adds the season's timeline, which passed FLC a couple days ago. Currently a good topic, the inclusion of the timeline would result in the topic having 50% featured content and therefore being upgraded to a featured topic. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 16:52, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support addition. Here’s hoping we can add Bret one day as an FA as well. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 08:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support igordebraga ≠ 02:46, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Glad to see the promotion. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hey man im josh (talk) 12:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Idiosincrático (talk) 13:45, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support solid work on a suitable addition! --K. Peake 09:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Great work on another addition to this series. Pseud 14 (talk) 12:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Great addition! TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 14:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cos ^{(X + Z)} 17:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to approve supplement to Good Topic – K. Peake 21:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History of the National Hockey League

The history of the National Hockey League begins with the end of its predecessor league, the National Hockey Association (NHA), in 1917. After unsuccessfully attempting to resolve disputes with Eddie Livingstone, owner of the Toronto Blueshirts, executives of the three other NHA franchises suspended the NHA, and formed the National Hockey League (NHL), replacing the Livingstone team with a temporary team in Toronto, the Arenas. The NHL's first quarter-century saw the league compete against two rival major leagues—the Pacific Coast Hockey Association and Western Canada Hockey League—for players and the Stanley Cup. The NHL first expanded into the United States in 1924 with the founding of the Boston Bruins, and by 1926 consisted of ten teams in Ontario, Quebec, the Great Lakes region, and the Northeastern United States. At the same time, the NHL emerged as the only major league and the sole competitor for the Stanley Cup; in 1947, the NHL completed a deal with the Stanley Cup trustees to gain full control of the Cup. The NHL's footprint spread across Canada as Foster Hewitt's radio broadcasts were heard coast-to-coast starting in 1933.

History of the National Hockey League

6 articles

1992–2017

Contributor(s): CosXZ, Scorpion0422, Resolute, Maxim

Meets all of the criteria. --Cos ^{(X + Z)} 17:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Perhaps the split discussion at Talk:History of the National Hockey League (1992–present)#Move to 1992–2017? that's been going on since February should be resolved first. There exists a draft at Draft:History of the National Hockey League (since 2017) which was worked on as recently as two days ago. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like there was support for a split and the draft is in good shape. Instead of being bold and moving the draft to main space myself, I've reached out to the draft creator here to see if they intend to move it to main space. They haven't edited in a few days, so we may need to be patient. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:25, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm one of the other editors on that draft, I've been meaning to port over content from Arizona Coyotes and Utah NHL team to fill out the currently-empty last section but haven't gotten around to it. Once that's done, the draft should be good to publish. The Kip ^(contribs) 17:43, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully expanded the aforementioned section, improved coverage of Tampa Bay's B2B and added a section on Boston's record-breaking season as well. Let me know if anything else is needed. The Kip ^(contribs) 06:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just following up - @Hey man im josh, would I be good to move the draft to mainspace and perform the associated removals/page moves/template edits associated with doing so? Only issue is that 2017-present will then need to go through the GA process, which will hold up this FT nom. The Kip ^(contribs) 17:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@The Kip: I don't see any reason why not. There did seem to be a general consensus in favor of the split and it's well written, so I say shoot. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hey man im josh I've moved to mainspace and nominated it for GA in order to keep the ball rolling on this nom. I believe I've taken care of all the associated moves, edits, removals, etc - please let me know if I've missed anything. The Kip ^(contribs) 19:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hold – pending discussion and draft article status. Idiosincrático (talk) 03:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good topic nominations

Kanye West studio albums (2nd supplementary nomination)

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Kanye West studio albums for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

Vultures 1

Kanye West studio albums

15 articles

The College Dropout

Late Registration ^(subtopic)

Graduation

808s & Heartbreak ^(subtopic)

My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy

Watch the Throne

Yeezus

The Life of Pablo

Ye ^(subtopic)

Kids See Ghosts ^(subtopic)

Jesus Is King ^(subtopic)

Donda

Donda 2

Vultures 1

I have now brought West's latest collaborative effort Vultures 1 with Ty Dolla Sign to GA status just under half a year after its release, although the nomination had been initiated well within the retention period! Having gone number one in multiple countries, the album is a worthy addition to the topic (shout out ULPS for working with me on the article) however I would like to check in retrospect with comments below is there a consensus if Donda 2 should still be included after West revealed it was a demo album? --K. Peake 09:19, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support for the inclusion of Vultures 1. Regarding your other point: I would vote for the removal of Donda 2 from this topic, as a demo album is not really equivalent (at least, in my mind) to a studio-recorded release. joeyquism (talk) 13:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support addition of Vultures 1. I am really unsure about the Donda 2 article. It still constitutes new original music by Kanye West. But in the article, although uncited, it says it was retroactively downgraded as a demo album. Maybe it could be included with a note like: Donda 2 (demo). I will remain neutral on the issue. Idiosincrático (talk) 05:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - the new addition as an uncontroversial supplementary nomination. On the question of Donda 2, it should be removed from the topic unless we want the scope to be opened to all future demo albums from West, which I believe is not the intention.--N Ø 08:43, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as a straightforward addition of the latest album. Also support the removal of Donda 2 as it's not a studio album, but a demo album. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the addition of Vultures 1. I'm also unsure about the Donda 2 article either, per above. — VAUGHAN J. (t · c) 13:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as a straight forward addition. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to add to article(s) in question – Aza24 (talk) 03:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like there is consensus to remove Donda 2, as well. Aza24 (talk) 04:02, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speak Now (Taylor's Version)

The topic was promoted by Aza24 via NovemBot (talk) 04:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speak Now (Taylor's Version) is a re-recorded album by the American singer-songwriter Taylor Swift. Released on July 7, 2023, the album contains re-recorded versions of songs that originally appeared on Swift's 2010 album Speak Now and six previously-unreleased "From the Vault" tracks. The album reached number one in countries including Australia, Canada, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Speak Now (Taylor's Version)

5 articles

"Electric Touch"

"When Emma Falls in Love"

"I Can See You"

"Castles Crumbling"

Contributor(s): Ippantekina, Ronherry, Gained, Infsai

All articles within scope are GA. --Ippantekina (talk) 04:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – All articles are pretty well defined as the "From the Vault" additions to the original album; all defined in the song template. The topic is similar to the 1989 (Taylor's Version) topic. Well done! Idiosincrático (talk) 06:19, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support igordebraga ≠ 03:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Straight forward topic scope with all relevant components promoted. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted. Aza24 (talk) 03:44, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/Speak Now (Taylor's Version)}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 04:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Jesus Is King (1st supplementary nomination)

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Jesus Is King for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

"God Is"

Jesus Is King

12 articles

"Selah"

"Follow God"

"Closed on Sunday"

"On God"

"Everything We Need"

"Water"

"God Is"

"Hands On"

"Use This Gospel"

"Jesus Is Lord"

Jesus Is King (film)

Contributor(s): K. Peake, Nice4What

After doing more research around four and a half years following the release of Jesus Is King, I managed to find enough sourcing to make an article for "God Is" and have brought it to GA status already to be added to the album's topic now the song is no longer a mere redirect! --K. Peake 08:32, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support igordebraga ≠ 13:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Idiosincrático (talk) 14:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - IanTEB (talk) 22:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Kyle Peake, per the FT criteria, shouldn't there be a template that links these all together. Something like {{Jesus Is King}} and a similar cat like Category:Jesus is King? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They're linked together on the Kanye West songs template. I've noticed that some other albums don't really have this kind of grouped linking on some template or category. Although the criteria says preferably in a template or category, it is usually clear that they're all the songs from the album. For example The Immaculate Collection compilation album topic doesn't have a template or category that groups these songs together. Idiosincrático (talk) 17:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, sorry, somehow I missed that one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Straight forward addition. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to add to article(s) in question – Aza24 (talk) 18:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Topic removal candidates

German Type UB I submarines

22 articles

SM UB-2

SM UB-3

SM UB-4

SM UB-5

SM UB-6

SM UB-7

SM UB-8

SM UB-9

SM UB-10

SM UB-11

SM UB-12

SM UB-13

SM UB-14

SM UB-16

SM UB-17

Austro-Hungarian U-10 class

SM U-10 (ex-UB-1)

SM U-11 (ex-UB-15)

SM U-15

SM U-16

SM U-17

SM UB-14 was delisted from GA on April 7 and was not re-promoted or nominated at GAN within 3 months of the delisting. As a result, it currently fails criteria 3B. -- Zoo Blazer 23:49, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove – per nomination. Idiosincrático (talk) 01:12, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per nominator. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:12, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category 5 Pacific hurricanes

The topic is missing two articles: Hurricane Jova (2023) and Hurricane Otis. The topic currently fails criteria 1D. -- Zoo Blazer 00:08, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove – per nomination. Idiosincrático (talk) 00:46, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, sadly. Hopefully the articles for Otis and Jova can be promoted in the not-too-far future, after which the topic could be re-nominated. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 20:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retired Pacific hurricanes

The topic is missing Hurricane Otis which had until July 2 to be at least nominated at GAN. Hurricane Dora (2023) is also missing. The topic currently fails criteria 1D. -- Zoo Blazer 00:21, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove – per nomination. Idiosincrático (talk) 00:45, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. The topic is also missing Hurricane Dora (2023), which was also retired last year. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 04:29, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added. Thanks for the heads up. -- Zoo Blazer 21:33, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, sadly. Hopefully the articles for Otis and Dora can be promoted in the not-too-far future, after which the topic could be re-nominated. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 20:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of UEFA club competition winning managers

UEFA men's club competition winning managers