Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Laysan honeycreeper/archive1: Difference between revisions

#2 probably needs an archive link, and should say what the source is rather than just the domain. Some sources like #15 need archives. I notice inconsistent applications of identifiers like DOI and JSTOR, is this an artifact of distinct sources having distinct parameters? It looks like we are dealing with prominent journals as sources. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]]) 09:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

:::Added archive to PDF link 2. It also says "Bishop Museum", so I'm not sure what else you mean needs to be added? Not sure why sources like 15 need archives, it's a link to the museum journal's repository where the PDF can be found, do you mean all sources to PDFs need to be archived? As for DOI/JSTOR, both don't necessarily exist for all the same sources. [[User:FunkMonk|FunkMonk]] ([[User talk:FunkMonk|talk]]) 15:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC)