Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana Book Store

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Mojo Hand (talk | contribs) at 18:04, 7 July 2024 (→‎Ana Book Store: Closed as keep (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Mojo Hand (talk) 18:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ana Book Store (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the number of sources, I'm failing to see how it being the last second-hand bookstore on Orchard Road makes it notable for a Wikipedia article. Article seems pretty trivial to me. Procyon117 (talk) 14:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Don't delete:Regardless of how trivial this article may be. I’m of the opinion, that any topic which has a descent amount of sources covering it is deserving of a Wikipedia page, as for this article which I have written, the citations are well distributed and there are a good number of references, so I don’t really see the issue, here. Stewmuhn (talk) 06:29, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Meets GNG. I note also that all the sources we have on the present article are recent, while the store itself is quite old, so there probably is more coverage out there. -- asilvering (talk) 04:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I was dubious myself, but IMHO this subject has sufficient direct detailing in multiple independent sources to meet general notability. Well done page creator! I mean no disrespect to the nominator; their assumptions may prove to be perfectly valid. BusterD (talk) 15:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.