Wikipedia:Media copyright questions: Difference between revisions

::::I don't see how I can prove this to you, nor why I should have to -- after all, I don't even know who you are. Why should I provide such personal legal and financial information on demand to a cipher on the internet that calls itself "Ww2censor"? So, instead of "proving" my ownership, I have provided a fair use rational that is exactly modeled on those provided for numerous other images in visual arts articles on Wikipedia (for example, see the fair use rationale for the image of the painting "Psychological Morphologies", by [[Roberto Matta]], in the article about that artist), and applies every bit as well. [[User:MarylandArtLover|MdArtLover]] ([[User talk:MarylandArtLover|talk]]) 19:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

:::::You don't have to prove anything to anyone or provide anything to anyone if you don't wish to, but Wikipedia also doesn't have to allow the image to be used. ww2 explained very clearly (and nicely) to you why your photograph may be a copyright violation. Whether use of the image might nonetheless be fair is a separate issue. If you wish to argue that the use is fair, you should do so. At the moment, your argument on the image's page does not go to fair use but to a misguided claim that you own the painting, etc. You should also calm down as getting all riled up won't help those who are evaluating whether the image should be deleted.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 23:07, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

 

== Aircraft images with manufacturer's logo ==