Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→RfC: +972 Magazine: unique headers |
→RfC: RFE/RL: unique headers |
||
Line 2,905:
*<small>Previous discussions (as near as I can find - please feel free to edit with anything I missed): [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_20#Using_the_Radio_Free_Europe_web_site_as_a_RS_for_someone's_expertise|2008]], [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_281#Radio_Free_Europe|2019]], [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_352#Radio_Free_Europe/Radio_Liberty_(RFE/RL)_as_a_reliable_source|2021]].[[User:Chetsford|Chetsford]] ([[User talk:Chetsford|talk]]) 11:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)</small>
*<small>See also [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_333#RfC:_Radio_Free_Asia_(RFA) 2021 RfC] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_391#Radio_Free_Asia 2022 discussion] on [[Radio Free Asia]]. [[User:Bobfrombrockley|BobFromBrockley]] ([[User talk:Bobfrombrockley|talk]]) 14:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)</small>
===Survey (RFE/RL)===
*'''4''' While it's possible to find individual instances of [[WP:USEBYOTHERS]], common sense would dictate that robust content analysis on an outlet's unreliability or propensity to publish falsehoods should be given more weight in source evaluation than a drive-by "according to X" mention. Following is a non-exhaustive (and easily expandable) list of 14 pieces of evidence documenting RFE/RL's unreliability:
:a. '''RFE/RL has a documented history of broadcasting lies, rumors, and conspiracy theories'''
Line 3,021:
{{reflist-talk}}
===Discussion (RFE/RL)===
* A recent [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Office_of_Cuba_Broadcasting_of_the_United_States_Government|previous RfC]] dealt with the [[Radio y Television Marti]] (AGM) of which RFE/RL is one of its sibling brands. I'm GF pinging participants in that discussion since this is closely related: [[User:Toa Nidhiki05]], [[User:FortunateSons]], [[User:Cortador]], [[User:Aquillion]], [[User:NightHeron]], [[User:Simonm223]], [[User:Alaexis]], [[User:Boynamedsue]], [[User:LokiTheLiar]]. [[User:Chetsford|Chetsford]] ([[User talk:Chetsford|talk]]) 11:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
*:Would you be so kind as to tag those that participated in the SNOW-discussion as well? I think that discussion may be relevant here too (unless I missed that you did, in which case I apologise). :) I think it might be beneficial to link to that discussion too, as the SNOW-consensus seemed to be that there can be significant difference between the sources, particularly that their reliability is not necessarily related. [[User:FortunateSons|FortunateSons]] ([[User talk:FortunateSons|talk]]) 12:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
| |||