Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
edited by robot: adding date header(s) |
|||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 701:
:{{u|Beamai2004}} Please understand that each language Wikipedia is a separate project, with their own editors and policies, and what is acceptable on one version(if it is) is not necessarily acceptable here. When translating an article from one Wikipedia to another, it is up to you to ensure that the translation meets the policies of the language version you are translating. The English Wikipedia tends to be stricter than others. Your draft is far too poorly sourced to be acceptable at this time. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 08:36, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
::{{u|Beamai2004}}, when I look at your draft, I see vast swathes of unreferenced content that violate the core content policy [[WP:V|Verifiability]]. Translations from other language versions are welcomed, but only if they comply with the [[WP: PAG|policies and guidelines]] of the English Wikipedia. Yours does not do so. [[User:Cullen328|Cullen328]] ([[User talk:Cullen328|talk]]) 08:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
:Looking at the German article [[:de:Gustav Maier (Schriftsteller)]], I see that the vast majority of citations are to his works. That is not acceptable in en-wiki: the majority of citations, and the basis for almost the entire article, should be to [[WP:independent|independent]] works ''about'' Maier. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 20:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
== 10:08, 12 July 2024 review of submission by BasharatAli254 ==
Line 766 ⟶ 767:
:At this event, did they convey all the information in such a promotional manner, or did you put your own spin on it?
:I noticed that you've also created a draft on the other co-founder of the business, [[Draft:Bülent Tekmen]]. What is your relationship with these people and/or the business? If you attended their event, and ended up writing articles on both individuals, there's probably a reason for that? -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 11:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
:Please note that {{HD/WINI}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 20:54, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
== 13:18, 12 July 2024 review of submission by 24.45.213.68 ==
Line 782 ⟶ 784:
{{Lafc|username=The Summum Bonum|ts=13:24, 12 July 2024|draft=Draft:Summum_Bonum}}
To whom it may concern need to delete my drafts need thy assistance Your guidance is at my mercy truly yours [[User:The Summum Bonum|The Summum Bonum]] ([[User talk:The Summum Bonum|talk]]) 13:24, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|The Summum Bonum}} Assuming nobody has made any significant edits (i.e. edits that aren't copy-edits, null edits, or draft reviews), you can tag it for deletion with {{tlx|db-g7}}. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 15:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
::Appreciate your help [[User:The Summum Bonum|The Summum Bonum]] ([[User talk:The Summum Bonum|talk]]) 16:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
== 13:41, 12 July 2024 review of submission by Gautamparmaraone ==
Line 798 ⟶ 803:
Robert20654
[[User:Robert20654|Robert20654]] ([[User talk:Robert20654|talk]]) 15:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
:@[[User:Robert20654|Robert20654]] you need to compare the rows that display correctly with those which do not. Change the first incorrectly displaying row to match a row which displays correctly. Then use PREVIEW to see the effect. If it has solved the first one, submit/save.
:Do the same with the next.
:Sometimes solving the first one will solve the rest. This means that you should go down the table, correcting one at a time. 🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦 17:47, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
== 16:44, 12 July 2024 review of submission by Adamcat222 ==
{{Lafc|username=Adamcat222|ts=16:44, 12 July 2024|draft=Draft:Valley_Forge_Capital}}
We received feedback that the subject was not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The subject is one of the largest hedge funds in the world. We have sited multiple large news sources. What else are we missing? What can we add? [[User:Adamcat222|Adamcat222]] ([[User talk:Adamcat222|talk]]) 16:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
:Who is "we"? User accounts are strictly single person use, the draft was rejected it will not be considered further. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 16:47, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
::You also need to disclose your evident conflict of interest. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 16:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|Adamcat222}} Odds are you cited the sources based on their ''outlet''; we have to judge sources based as much on their ''[[WP:RSCONTEXT|content]]'' as well. Refer to my /Decode subpage (linked below as "critiques"):
:* I cannot assess either ''Barrons'' source or either ''Bloomberg'' source (walled). A reviewer with access to these sources will need to assess them.
:* https://commercialobserver.com/2023/05/valley-forge-relocates-to-miamis-one-biscayne-tower/ is useless for notability ([[WP:CORPDEPTH|routine coverage]]). Real estate/HQ move news.
:* I cannot assess https://www.pionline.com/largest-hedge-funds/2023/full-list (walled) but from what I ''can'' see this looks like it would be useless for notability ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]) as this appears to be just a list. A reviewer with access to this source will need to confirm my suspicions.
:* We don't cite government documents [[WP:PRIMARY|by dint of them being government documents and thus primary sources]].
:* https://www.businessinsider.com/stock-market-investing-strategy-from-warren-buffett-disciple-dev-kantesaria-2019-9 is useless for notability ([[WP:PRIMARY|connexion to subject]]). Prose-style interview with company principal that lacks a substantial [[Lead paragraph|lede]].
:* https://valueinvestorinsight.com/Content_Free/investor-insight-standing-out-october-2019.aspx is useless for notability ([[WP:PRIMARY|connexion to subject]]). Q&A interview with company principal that lacks a substantial lede.
:* https://www.hedgeweek.com/compounding-machines-cigar-butt-stocks-appeal-bond-ratings-agencies/ is useless for notability ([[WP:RSCONTEXT|wrong topic]]). This is more about Kantesaria (the aforementioned company principal) and his investment strategies. Coverage of the man is not equivalent to coverage of the company.
:* https://finance.yahoo.com/news/only-finance-stocks-matter-valley-002115423.html seems OK. You should cite the original source (or an [[Wayback Machine|archive]] thereof) on Insider Monkey.
:Other than the Yahoo/Insider Monkey source, the others I could assess are of no use for [[WP:Notability|notability as]] [[WP:NCORP|Wikipedia defines it]]. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 18:34, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
== 19:11, 12 July 2024 review of submission by Ricrickey ==
{{Lafc|username=Ricrickey|ts=19:11, 12 July 2024|draft=Draft:Love_unleashes_fathers_love}}
Why was this declined [[User:Ricrickey|Ricrickey]] ([[User talk:Ricrickey|talk]]) 19:11, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
:@[[User:Ricrickey|Ricrickey]]: why was a blank page rejected? I guess because it was blank. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 19:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
:Why do you think it was a viable encyclopaedic article? <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">Qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 19:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
::That makes sense [[User:Ricrickey|Ricrickey]] ([[User talk:Ricrickey|talk]]) 19:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
:::I’m new here I have no clue how this works [[User:Ricrickey|Ricrickey]] ([[User talk:Ricrickey|talk]]) 19:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
::::Hi @[[User:Ricrickey|Ricrickey]], have a read of [[WP:YFA]]. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">Qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 19:24, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
::::He, Ricrickey. I always advise new editors to not even ''think'' about creating a new article until they have spent several weeks (at least) working in Wikipedia and learning about how it works. Would you take up tennis and immediately enter a major tournament? Would you try building a house when you have no housebuilding experience?
::::Once you have an understanding of funbamental principles such as [[WP:verifiability|verifiability]], [[WP:neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], [[WP:reliable sources|reliable sources]], and [[WP:notability|notability]], then it might be worth reading [[WP:your first article|your first article]] and giving it a go. Until then, trying to create an article is going to be a disappointing and frustrating experience, as you probably won't understand the feedback you get.
::::Note that creating articles is not the only way, or necessarily the best way, to contribute to Wikipedia. I've been here for nineteen years, made nearly 25 thousand edits, but I've only ever created 14 articles (and some of those were just redirects or disambiguation pages). [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 21:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
== 21:45, 12 July 2024 review of submission by Abdelalinour ==
{{Lafc|username=Abdelalinour|ts=21:45, 12 July 2024|draft=Draft:Abdelali_nour}}
hello what i should do to creat my own biography ? [[User:Abdelalinour|Abdelalinour]] ([[User talk:Abdelalinour|talk]]) 21:45, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
== 21:47, 12 July 2024 review of submission by 1-335 Warriors ==
{{Lafc|username=1-335 Warriors|ts=21:47, 12 July 2024|draft=1st Battalion 355th Infantry Regiment}}
I created a page that is for an active duty army battalion. The page was not approved to be published and I don't understand why. Our higher headquarters at the Army level (3 echelons up), Division level (2 echelons up) and Brigade level (1 echelon up), both have approved pages. They are First Army, First Army Division East, and 157th Infantry Brigade respectively. Our battalion is even mentioned on the 157th Infantry Brigade as a subordinate battalion. The source that I provided is used to populate our entire page. The notification didn't mention what part of the page was not supported by an article.
Thanks for your help. [[User:1-335 Warriors|1-335 Warriors]] ([[User talk:1-335 Warriors|talk]]) 21:47, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
== 21:59, 12 July 2024 review of submission by Win8x ==
{{Lafc|username=Win8x|ts=21:59, 12 July 2024|draft=Draft:Pizza_Salvatore}}
Hey there. I understand why my draft was declined and I am not contesting that. While I will try to find more sources, are my non-independent sources, 2 and 3, completely out of the question or can I keep them? Yes, they do contain interviews but what I use the sources for isn't the information from the interviews (rather, I use what the authors themselves of the articles say about the company). Thank you! [[User:Win8x|Win8x]] ([[User talk:Win8x|talk]]) 21:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
== 22:54, 12 July 2024 review of submission by 91.105.102.125 ==
{{Lafc|username=91.105.102.125|ts=22:54, 12 July 2024|draft=Draft:Jyllandsgade_5_-_The_Band}}
Dear Customer Support,
My submission was rejected without stating a reason, as I am sure that my submission does not violate Wikipedia's rules. Is there a possibility to get a reason for cancellation and work it through?
Best,
Naruba. [[Special:Contributions/91.105.102.125|91.105.102.125]] ([[User talk:91.105.102.125|talk]]) 22:54, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
= July 13 =
| |||