Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 730:
::::::::Warm Regards. [[User:ExoField|ExoField]] ([[User talk:ExoField|talk]]) 12:26, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::I am not particularly an expert in Geography, but am pretty experienced in reviewing and editing articles - what's the question? <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">Qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 12:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::There's this article here: [[Upper Swat Canal]]
::::::::::It was tagged with not being notable enough under geographic guidelines by a much more experienced editor. I've went over the geographic guidelines and understood the point. Now, this canal has a couple of books written on it and it almost always has a separate section in the references which are currently present in the article. Hasn't notability been established? I originally thought the issue was that there weren't ''enough'' references, is it the quality of the reference which creates the issue? I'd appreciate any guidelines here.
::::::::::By the way, I'm 100% sure that this article is notable, it's the largest, most important canal in North-Western Pakistan, but I'm finding a bit of trouble finding sources which highlight its importance which aren't written in a blog post. There are a lot of references dating back to the early 1900s which mention that it will be one of the most important canals in the future, but all of it is used in future tense.
::::::::::Thanks for reading. [[User:ExoField|ExoField]] ([[User talk:ExoField|talk]]) 12:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
== 10:59, 12 July 2024 review of submission by Mahendra Umesh Nayaka ==
| |||